Predicting Aggregated User Satisfaction in Software Projects

[1] Atkeson C.G., Moore A.W., Schaal S., Locally Weighted Learning, Artificial Intelligence Review, 11, 1-5, 1997, 11-73.10.1023/A:1006559212014Search in Google Scholar

[2] Cerpa, N., Bardeen, M., Astudillo, C. A., Verner, J., Evaluating different families of prediction methods for estimating software project outcomes, Journal of Systems and Software, 112, 2016, 48–64.10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.011Search in Google Scholar

[3] Cleary J.G., Trigg L.E., K*: an instance-based learner using and entropic distance measure, in: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’95), Armand Prieditis and Stuart J. Russell (Eds.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995, 108-114.10.1016/B978-1-55860-377-6.50022-0Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ding, C.H.Q., Peng, H., Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data, in: Proc. the 2nd IEEE Comp. Society Bioinformatics Conf., Stanford, CA, IEEE Comp. Society, Los Alamitos, 2003, 523–529.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Fenton, N., Marsh, W., Neil, M., Cates, P., Forey, S., Tailor, M., Making Resource Decisions for Software Projects, in: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2004, 397–406.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Frank E., Hall M.A., Witten I.H., The WEKA Workbench. Online Appendix for “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques”, Morgan Kaufmann, Fourth Edition, 2016, http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/Witten_et_al_2016_appendix.pdf, last accessed 2018/05/22.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Frank E., Witten I.H., Generating Accurate Rule Sets Without Global Optimization. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML ‘98), Jude W. Shavlik (Ed.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1998, 144-151.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Friedman J., Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Special Invited Paper. Additive Logistic Regression: A Statistical View of Boosting, The Annals of Statistics, 28, 2, 2000, 337-374.10.1214/aos/1016218223Search in Google Scholar

[9] Garcés, L., Ampatzoglou, A., Avgeriou, P., Nakagawa, E.Y., Quality attributes and quality models for ambient assisted living software systems: A systematic mapping, Information and Software Technology, 82, 2017, 121-138.10.1016/j.infsof.2016.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[10] Hall M., Frank E., Combining Naive Bayes and Decision Tables, in: D.L. Wilson & H. Chad (Eds), Proceedings of Twenty-First International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, AAAI Press, Coconut Grove, Florida, USA, 2008, 318-319.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Holmes G., Pfahringer B., Kirkby R., Frank E., Hall M., Multiclass Alternating Decision Trees, in: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML ‘02), Tapio Elomaa, Heikki Mannila, and Hannu Toivonen (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 2002, 161-172.10.1007/3-540-36755-1_14Search in Google Scholar

[12] Holte R.C., Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Machine Learning. 11, 1993, 63-91.10.1023/A:1022631118932Search in Google Scholar

[13] ISBSG Repository Data Release 11. International Software Benchmarking Standards Group, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Idri, A., Bachiri, M., Fernández-Alemán, J.L., A Framework for Evaluating the Software Product Quality of Pregnancy Monitoring Mobile Personal Health Records, Journal of Medical Systems, 40, 3, 2016, art. no. 50, 1-17.10.1007/s10916-015-0415-z26643080Search in Google Scholar

[15] ISO/IEC: Software engineering Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) System and software quality models, volume ISO/IEC 25010:2011(E), 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Jin W., Tung A.K.H., Han J., Wang W., Ranking Outliers Using Symmetric Neighborhood Relationship, in: Ng WK., Kitsuregawa M., Li J., Chang K. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3918. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.10.1007/11731139_68Search in Google Scholar

[17] Jones C., Applied Software Measurement: Global Analysis of Productivity and Quality, McGraw-Hill Education, 3rd edition, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kitchenham B.A., Madeyski L., Budgen D., Keung J., Brereton P., Charters S., Gibbs S., Pohthong A., Robust Statistical Methods for Empirical Software Engineering, Empirical Software Engineering, 22, 2, 2017, 579-630.10.1007/s10664-016-9437-5Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kocaguneli E., Menzies T., Bener A., Keung J. W., Exploiting the Essential Assumptions of Analogy-Based Effort Estimation, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 38, 2, 2012, 425–438.10.1109/TSE.2011.27Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kohavi R., The power of decision tables, in: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML’95), Nada Lavrač and Stefan Wrobel (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995, 174-189.10.1007/3-540-59286-5_57Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kohavi R., Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers: a decision-tree hybrid, in: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’96), Evangelos Simoudis, Jiawei Han, and Usama Fayyad (Eds.). AAAI Press, 1996, 202-207.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Landwehr N., Hall M., Frank E., Logistic Model Trees. Machine Learning, 59, 1-2, 2005, 161-205.10.1007/s10994-005-0466-3Search in Google Scholar

[23] Le Cessie S., Van Houwelingen J., Ridge Estimators in Logistic Regression, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 41, 1, 1992, 191-201.10.2307/2347628Search in Google Scholar

[24] Menzies T., Jalali O., Hihn J., Baker D., Lum K., Stable rankings for different effort models, Automated Software Engineering, 17, 4, 2010, 409–437.10.1007/s10515-010-0070-zSearch in Google Scholar

[25] Olsina, L., Lew, P., Dieser, A., Rivera, B., Updating quality models for evaluating new generation web applications, Journal of Web Engineering, 11, 3, 2012, 209-246.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Pearl J., Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Representation and Reasoning Series (2nd printing ed.). San Francisco, California: Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Quinlan R., C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

[28] R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Radlinski L., How software development factors influence user satisfaction in meeting business objectives and requirements?, in: Madeyski, L., Ochodek, M. (eds.), Software Engineering from Research and Practice Perspectives, chapter 6, Nakom, Poznan-Warszawa, 2014, 101–119.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Radliński Ł., Preliminary evaluation of schemes for predicting user satisfaction with the ability of system to meet stated objectives, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Computer Science, 9, 2, 2015, 32–50.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Radlinski L., Towards expert-based modeling of integrated software quality, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Computer Science, 6, 2, 2012, 13–26.Search in Google Scholar

[32] RapidMiner Studio, https://rapidminer.com/products/studio/, last accessed 2018/05/22.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Schowe B., Morik K., Fast-Ensembles of Minimum Redundancy Feature Selection, in: Okun O., Valentini G., Re M. (eds) Ensembles in Machine Learning Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 373. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.10.1007/978-3-642-22910-7_5Search in Google Scholar

[34] Shepperd M., Bowes D., Hall T., Researcher Bias: The Use of Machine Learning in Software Defect Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 40, 2014, 603–616.10.1109/TSE.2014.2322358Search in Google Scholar

[35] Shi H., Best-first Decision Tree Learning, Thesis, Master of Science. The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Song Q., Jia Z., Shepperd M., Ying S., Liu J., A General Software Defect-Proneness Prediction Framework, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 37, 3, 2011, 356-370.10.1109/TSE.2010.90Search in Google Scholar

[37] Sumner M., Frank E., Hall M., Speeding up logistic model tree induction, in: Proceedings of the 9th European conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (PKDD’05), Alípio Mário Jorge, Luís Torgo, Pavel Brazdil, Rui Camacho, and João Gama (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005, 675-683.10.1007/11564126_72Search in Google Scholar

[38] Tang J., Chen Z., Fu A. W. C., Cheung, D. W., Enhancing Effectiveness of Outlier Detections for Low Density Patterns, in: Pacific-Asia Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD). Taipei, 2002, 535-548.10.1007/3-540-47887-6_53Search in Google Scholar

[39] Vargas J.A., García-Mundo L., Genero M., Piattini M., A systematic mapping study on serious game quality, in: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE ‘14), ACM, New York, 2014, Article no. 15.10.1145/2601248.2601261Search in Google Scholar