Dividend Smoothing and Investor Protection

Open access


This paper examines the agency model of dividends where the importance of dividends depends on the level of investor protection. The importance of dividends is presented by the dividend smoothing concept, while the level of investor protection is determined by the legal origin. Within this, the sensitivity of dividends to earnings changes was analyzed to examine the universality of the dividend smoothing phenomenon. Subsequently, the difference in proportions of dividend smoothing firms within the common law and civil law countries was tested to determine which of these two systems attributes more importance to dividends. Finally, the application of Lintner’s model was examined in transition countries as well as in United States. Research results show that dividend smoothing is a globally widespread phenomenon, but the likelihood to reduce or cut dividends is greater in civil law countries. Also, the largest percentage of dividend smoothing firms was recorded in common law countries.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aivazian V. Booth L. & Cleary S. (2006). Dividend Smoothing and Debt Rating. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 41 439–453.

  • Atanassov J. & Mandell A. J. (2018). Corporate governance and dividend policy: Evidence of tunneling from master limited partnerships. Journal of Corporate Finance 53(C) 106-132.

  • Bhattacharya D. Li W. & Rhee S. G. (2016). Does Better Corporate Governance Encourage Higher Payout? : Risk Agency Cost and Dividend Policy. HIAS discussion papers available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f48e/112c450660ec27f60e45094d96a20a1bc13b.pdf.

  • Brav A. Graham J. R. Harvey C. R. & Michaely R. (2005). Payout policy in the 21st century. Journal of Financial Economics 77 483–527.

  • Caoa L Du Y. & Hansen J. Ø. (2017). Foreign institutional investors and dividend policy: Evidence from China. International Business Review 26 (5) 816-827.

  • DeAngelo H. DeAngelo L. & Skinner D. (2004). Are dividends disappearing? Dividend concentration and the consolidation of earnings. Journal of Financial Economics 72 425–456

  • Djankov S. La Porta R. Lopez-de Silanes F. & Shleifer A. (2008) The Law and Economics of Self Dealing. Journal of Financial Economics 88 (3) 430-465.

  • Džidić A. (2016). Impact of Capital Market Development on Dividend Policy Doctoral dissertation Faculty of Economics University of Mostar and Faculty of Economics University of Split.

  • Fama E. & Babiak H. (1968). Dividend policy: an empirical analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63. 1132-1161.

  • Fama E.F. & French K.R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay. Journal of Financial Economics 60 3-43.

  • Fatemi A. & Bildik R. (2012). Yes Dividends Are Disappearing Worldwide Evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance 36 (3) 662-677.

  • Fazzari S. Hubbard G. & Petersen B. (2000). Investment - cash flow sensitivities are useful: a comment on Kaplan and Zingales. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 695-705.

  • Francis J. R. Khurana I. K. & Pereira R. (2001). Investor Protection Laws Accounting and Auditing Around the World. available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=287652

  • Lintner J. (1956). Distribution of Incomes of Corporation among Dividends Retained Earnings and Taxes. The American Economic Review 2 97-113.

  • La Porta R. Lopez-de-Silanes F. Shleifer A. & Vishny R. (1996). Law and Finance NBER Working Paper 5661.

  • La Porta R. Lopez-de-Silanes F. Shleifer A. & Vishny R. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance 52 (3) 1131-1150.

  • La Porta R. Lopez-de-Silanes F. Shleifer A. & Vishny R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106 (6) 1113-1155.

  • La Porta R. Lopez-de-Silanes F. & Shleifer A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54 (2) 471-517.

  • La Porta R. Lopez-de-Silanes F. Shleifer A. &. Vishny R. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance 55 (1) 1-33.

  • La Porta R. Lopez-de-Silanes F. & Shleifer A. (2006). What Works in Securities Laws? The Journal of Finance 61 (1) 1-32.

  • Leuz C. D. Nanda & Wysocki P. (2003). Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69 505–527.

  • Love I. (2003). Financial development and financing constraints: International evidence from the structural investment model. Review of Financial Studies 16 765-791.

  • Mclean R. D. Zhang T. Y. & Zhao M. X. (2012). Why does the law matter? Investor protection and its effects on investment finance and growth. Journal of Finance 67 313–350.

  • Michaely R. & Roberts M. (2012). Corporate Dividend Policies: Lessons from Private Firms. Review of Financial Studies (25) 3 711-746.

  • Moortgat M. Annaert J. & Deloof M. (2017). Investor protection taxation and dividend policy: long run evidence from Belgium 1838-2012. Journal of Banking and Finance 85 113-131.

  • Poshakwale S.S. & Thapa C. (2011). Investor protection and International Equity Portfolio Investments. Global Finance Journal 22 (2) 116–129.

  • Rajan R. G. & Zingales L. (1998). Financial Dependence and Growth. American Economic Review 88 (3) 559-586.

  • Wurgler J. (2000). Financial Markets and the Allocation of Capital. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1-2) 187-214.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 49 49 9
PDF Downloads 50 50 9