Material Well-being and Happiness in Transition Countries

Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to further the research of the connection between material well-being and happiness in transition economies. We analyzed panel data obtained from the World Database of Happiness and Eurostat. Our results indicate that out of all the major macroeconomic variables (GDP, employment, inflation, taxes etc.), the most significant (and the only stable) predictor of changes in happiness in transition countries is the level of employment. The results are consistent with a hypothesis of a still prevalent “socialist mentality” in the analyzed sample of countries which are all formerly socialist economies that typically place high (or full) employment as the highest economic priority (as opposed to GDP growth, low inflation etc.). Our results differ from the conclusions of the few studies done on this sample of countries, which suggests additional research on the subject is likely required.

Clark, A., & Senik, C. (2011). Will GDP Growth Increase Happiness in Developing Countries? (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1796590). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Database - Eurostat. (n.d.). Retrieved May 22, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52-61.

Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The Macroeconomics of Happiness. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 809-827.

Easterlin, R. (1974) Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence” In: David, R. and Reder, R., eds. Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz, Academic Press, New York. - References - Scientific Research Publish. (n.d.).

Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35-47.

Easterlin, R. A. (2005). Feeding the Illusion of Growth and Happiness: A Reply to Hagerty and Veenhoven. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 429-443.

Easterlin, R. A., & Angelescu McVey, L. (2009). Happiness and Growth the World Over: Time Series Evidence on the Happiness-Income Paradox (IZA Discussion Paper No. 4060). Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness-income aradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52), 22463-22468.

Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and Happiness Revisited - Growing National Income Does Go with Greater Happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64(1), 1-27. Happiness in Nations. (n.d.). Retrieved May 22, 2017, from http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.php

Layard, R. (2006). Happiness and Public Policy: A Challenge to the Profession*. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C24-C33.

Malešević Perović, L. (2009). Subjective Economic Well-being in Transition Countries: Investigating the Relative Importance of Macroeconomic Variables. Financial Theory and Practice, 32(4), 519-537.

Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox (Working Paper No. 14282). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2013). The Easterlin illusion: economic growth does go with greater happiness (MPRA Paper No. 43983). University Library of Munich, Germany

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 116 116 15
PDF Downloads 54 54 13