[‘Declaración de Autodeterminación, San Andrés, Islas’ (28 April 2002).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ahlborn C, ‘UNESCO Approves Palestinian Membership Bid – A Case for US Countermeasures Against the Organization?’ (EJIL: Talk!, 8 November 2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[Akande D, ‘Palestine as a UN Observer State: Does this Make Palestine a State?’ (EJIL: Talk!, 3 December 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[Andorno R, ‘Human Dignity and Human Rights as a Common Ground for a Global Bioethics’ (2009) 34 Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17.10.1093/jmp/jhp023]Search in Google Scholar
[Antonopoulos C, ‘Force by Armed Groups as Armed Attack and the Broadening of Self-Defence’ (2008) LV Netherlands International Law Review 159.10.1017/S0165070X08001599]Search in Google Scholar
[del Arenal C, ‘La nueva sociedad mundial y las nuevas realidades internacionales: un reto para la teoría y para la política’ in Cursos de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales de Vitoria-Gasteiz 2001 (EHU 2002) 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[d’Aspremont J, ‘Non-State Actors in International Law: A Scholarly Invention?’ (2009) FWO Seminar - Non-State Actors in International Law - Leuven 26-28 March 2009 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Belanger-McMurdo A, ‘A Fight for Statehood? ISIS and Its Quest for Political Domination’ (E-International Relations Students, 5 October 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyle J, ‘Islamic State and the idea of statehood’ (BBC News, 6 January 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Byers M, ‘Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, A New Age’ (2002) 47 McGill Law Journal 389.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cançado Trindade A, ‘Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos, Derecho Internacional de los Refugiados y Derecho Internacional Humanitario: Aproximaciones y Convergencias’ (1996) I Estudios Especializados de Derechos Humanos.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carrillo-Santarelli N, ‘Enhanced Multi-Level Protection of Human Dignity in a Globalized Context through Humanitarian Global Legal Goods’ (2012) 13 German Law Journal 829.10.1017/S2071832200020782]Search in Google Scholar
[Carrillo-Santarelli N, ‘A Humane Legal Response to Contemporary Challenges on the Use of Force posed by Non-State Threats and Possible Misuses of Military Necessity’ (2016) 09 Quaestio Iuris 980.10.12957/rqi.2016.22449]Search in Google Scholar
[Cassese A, ‘Remarks on Scelle’s Theory of “Role Splitting” (dédoublement fonctionnel) in International Law’ (1990) 1 EJIL 210.10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035763]Search in Google Scholar
[Cassese A, ‘Ex iniuria ius oritur: Are We Moving towards International Legitimation of Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community?’ (1999) 10 EJIL 23.10.1093/ejil/10.1.23]Search in Google Scholar
[Chachko E and Deeks A, ‘Who is on Board with “Unwilling or Unable”? (Lawfare, 10 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen L, ‘The U.S.-Taiwan -China Relationship and the Evolution of Taiwan Statehood’ (Opinio Juris, 16 May 2016).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190601126.003.0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General comment No. 23 (2016) on the right to just and favourable conditions of work (article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), E/C.12/GC/23, 27 April 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General comment No. 22 (2016) on the right to sexual and reproductive health (article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), E/C.12/GC/22 [2016].]Search in Google Scholar
[Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, General recommendation No. 34 (2016) on the rights of rural women, CEDAW/C/GC/34 [2016].]Search in Google Scholar
[Concurring Opinion of Judge AA Cançado Trindade to: I/A Court H.R., Juridical Condition and Rights of the Undocumented Migrants. Advisory Opinion OC-18/03 of September 17, 2003. Series A No.18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Concurring Opinion of Judge AA Cançado Trindade to: I/A Court H.R., Juridical Condition and Human Rights of the Child. Advisory Opinion OC-17/02 of August 28, 2002. Series A No.17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Conference for Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1992 Summit, Helsinki, “The Challenges of Change”, Helsinki Document 1992.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook S and Leheta A, ‘Don’t Blame Sykes-Picot for the Middle East’s Mess’ (Foreign Policy, 13 May 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Cortés-Martín J, Las Organizaciones Internacionales: Codificación y Desarrollo Progresivo de su Responsabilidad Internacional (Instituto Andaluz de Administración Pública 2008).]Search in Google Scholar
[Declaration of Judge Simma to: Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deva S and Bilchitz D, ‘Response to Comments of Professor John Ruggie on “Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect?” (CUP 2013)’ (15 January 2014) 1.10.1017/CBO9781139568333]Search in Google Scholar
[Domingo R, The New Global Law (CUP 2010).10.1017/CBO9780511711916]Search in Google Scholar
[Dupuy P, ‘International Law: Torn between Coexistence, Cooperation and Globalization. General Conclusions’ (1998) 9 EJIL 278.10.1093/ejil/9.2.278]Search in Google Scholar
[Fitzmaurice M, ‘Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties’ in Dinah Shelton (ed), The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law (OUP 2013).10.1093/law/9780199640133.003.0032]Search in Google Scholar
[Galindo Vélez F, ‘Consideraciones sobre la determinación de la condición de refugiado’ in Sandra Namihas (ed), Derecho Internacional de los Refugiados (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú 2001).]Search in Google Scholar
[García-Pérez R, ‘Recensión de: Pons Rafols, X., Cataluña: Derecho a decidir y Derecho internacional, Editorial Reus, Madrid, 2015.10.17103/reei.30.31]Search in Google Scholar
[Gatto A, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the External Relations of the EU’ (2005) 24 Yearbook of European Law 423.10.1093/yel/24.1.423]Search in Google Scholar
[Geisinger A and Stein M, ‘A Theory of Expressive International Law’ (2007) 60 Vanderbilt Law Review 77.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gómez Robledo A, El ius cogens internacional: Estudio histórico-crítico (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2003).]Search in Google Scholar
[Heller K, ‘The Seemingly Inexorable March of “Unwilling or Unable” Through the Academy’ (Opinio Juris, 6 March 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Heller K, ‘France Fails to Adopt “Unwilling or Unable” in Syria’ (Opinio Juris, 11 October 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Henckaerts J, ‘Customary International Humanitarian Law: a response to US comments’ (2007) 89 Intl Rev of the Red Cross 473.10.1017/S1816383107001129]Search in Google Scholar
[Henderson C, ‘The Extraterritorial Seizure of Individuals under International Law – The Case of al-Liby: Part II’ (EJIL: Talk!, 7 November 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 29, States of Emergency (Article 4), CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11 [2001].]Search in Google Scholar
[Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on Kosovo (Serbia), CCPR/C/UNK/CO/1 [2006].]Search in Google Scholar
[Human Rights Council, Report on the first session of the open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights, with the mandate of elaborating an international legally binding instrument [2016] A/HRC/31/50]Search in Google Scholar
[Human Rights Council, Report on the first session of the open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights, with the mandate of elaborating an international legally binding instrument, Chair-Rapporteur: María Fernanda Espinosa, A/HRC/31/50 [2016].]Search in Google Scholar
[I/A Court H.R., “Other treaties” subject to the consultative jurisdiction of the Court (Art. 64 American Convention on Human Rights). Advisory Opinion OC-1/82 of September 24, 1982. Series A No. 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[I/A Court H.R., Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v Honduras. Merits. Judgment of July 29, 1988. Series C No. 4.]Search in Google Scholar
[I/A Court H.R., The Right to Information on Consular Assistance in the Framework of the Guarantees of the due Process of Law. Advisory Opinion OC-16/99 of October 1, 1999. Series A No.16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Indigenous Peoples, Afro-Descendent Communities, and Natural Resources: Human Rights Protection in the Context of Extraction, Exploitation, and Development Activities (also known as ‘Indigenous Peoples, Communities of African Descent, Extractive Industries), OEA/Ser.L/V/II, Doc. 47/15 [2015].]Search in Google Scholar
[Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Towards the Closure of Guantanamo, OAS/Ser.L/V/II, Doc. 20/15 [2015].]Search in Google Scholar
[International Court of Justice, Corfu Channel case, Judgment of April 9th, 1949: I.C.J. Reports 1949.]Search in Google Scholar
[International Court of Justice, Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[International Court of Justice, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[International Court of Justice, Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[International Law Commission, ‘Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries, 2001’ (2001) Yearbook of the International Law Commission]Search in Google Scholar
[International Law Commission, Identification of customary international law: Text of the draft conclusions provisionally adopted by the Drafting Committee [2015] A/CN.4/L.869.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaul I and Mendonza R, ‘Advancing the Concept of Public Goods’ in Inge Kaul et al. (eds) Providing Global Public Goods (OUP 2003).10.1093/0195157400.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaul I, Conceiçao P, Le Goulven K and Mendoza R, ‘How to Improve the Provision of Global Public Goods’ in Inge Kaul et al. (eds) Providing Global Public Goods (OUP 2003).10.1093/0195157400.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kittrie O, Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War (OUP 2016) 1-5; Orde F. Kittrie, ‘The emergence of lawfare [infographic]’ (OUPblog, 16 May 2016).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190263577.003.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Klabbers J, International Law (CUP 2013).10.1017/CBO9781139022569]Search in Google Scholar
[Koh H, ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’ (1997) 106 The Yale Law Journal 2599.10.2307/797228]Search in Google Scholar
[Lang A, ‘Legal basis for UK military action in Syria’ (2015) 7404 United Kingdom House of Commons Library Briefing Papers 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee T, ‘International Law, International Relations Theory, and Preemptive War: The Vitality of Sovereign Equality Today’ (2004) 67 Law and Contemporary Problems 147.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.]Search in Google Scholar
[McAdams R, The Expressive Powers of Law: Theories and Limits (Harvard UP 2015) 1-10.10.4159/harvard.9780674735965]Search in Google Scholar
[McDougal M and Lasswell H, ‘The Identification and Appraisal of Diverse Systems of Public Order’ (1959) 53 AJIL 1.10.2307/2195211]Search in Google Scholar
[Merezhko O, ‘Crimea’s Annexation by Russia – Contradictions of the New Russian Doctrine of International Law’ (2015) 75 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht/Heidelberg Journal of International Law 167.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meron T, The Humanization of International Law (Martinus Nijhoff 2006).]Search in Google Scholar
[Milanovic M, ‘Self-Defense and Non-State Actors: Indeterminacy and the Jus ad Bellum’ (EJIL: Talk!, 21 February 2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[Milanovic M, ‘Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg’ (EJIL: Talk!, 29 August 2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[Milanovic M, ‘Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: An Overview’ (EJIL: Talk!, 30 November 2011).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696208.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Milanovic M, ‘A Few Thoughts on Hassan v United Kingdom’ (EJIL: Talk!, 22 October 2014)]Search in Google Scholar
[Milanovic M, ‘Jurisdiction, Attribution and Responsibility in Jaloud’ (EJIL: Talk!, 11 December 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of the States.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nijman J, ‘Non-state actors and the international rule of law: Revisiting the ‘realist theory’ of international legal personality’ (2010) Amsterdam Center for International Law Research Paper Series 1.10.2139/ssrn.1522520]Search in Google Scholar
[Oduntan G, Sovereignty and Jurisdiction in the Airspace and Outer Space: Legal Criteria for Spatial Delimitation (Routledge 2012) 132; John Kish, International Law and Espionage (Martinus Nijhoff 1995).10.4324/9780203807552]Search in Google Scholar
[Ohlin J, ‘The Unwilling or Unable Doctrine Comes to Life’ (Opinio Juris, 23 September 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Perritt H, The Road to Independence for Kosovo: A Chronicle of the Ahtisaari Plan (CUP 2010).10.1017/CBO9780511635410]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinto M, ‘El principio pro homine. Criterios de hermenéutica y pautas para la regulación de los derechos humanos’ in Martín Abregú and Christian Courtis (eds), La aplicación de los tratados sobre derechos humanos por los tribunales locales (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales 1997).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pitts J, ‘Intervention and sovereign equality: legacies of Vattel’ in Stefano Recchia and Jennifer M. Welsh (eds), Just and Unjust Military Intervention: European Thinkers from Vitoria to Mill (CUP 2013).10.1017/CBO9781107323681.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Posner E, The Twilight of Human Rights Law (OUP 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I).]Search in Google Scholar
[Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ratner S, The Thin Justice of International Law: A Moral Reckoning of the Law of Nations (OUP 2015).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198704041.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Remiro Brotóns A et al., Derecho Internacional: Curso General (Tirant Lo Blanch 2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[Reports of International Arbitral Awards, Vol II, Island of Palmas case (Netherlands, USA) 4 April 19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosalyn Higgins, Problems & Process: International Law and How We Use it (OUP 2004).]Search in Google Scholar
[SC of Canada [1998] Reference re Secession of Quebec File No.: 25506.]Search in Google Scholar
[Separate Opinion of Judge Ammoun to: International Court of Justice, Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1970.]Search in Google Scholar
[Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade to: Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade to: Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Separate Opinion of Judge Kooijmans to: International Court of Justice, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Uganda), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shany Y, Cohen A and Mimran T, ‘ISIS: Is the Islamic State Really a State?’ (The Israel Democracy Institute, 14 September 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Sloan J, ‘Breaching international law to ensure its enforcement: the reliance by the ICTY on illegal capture' (2003) 6 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 319.10.1017/S1389135900001367]Search in Google Scholar
[de Than A and Shorts E, International Criminal Law and Human Rights (Sweet & Maxwell 2003).]Search in Google Scholar
[Thürer D, ‘The Emergence of Non-Governmental Organizations and Transnational Enterprises in International Law and the Changing Role of the State’ in Rainer Hofmann (ed), Non-State Actors as New Subjects of International Law (Duncker & Humblot 1999).]Search in Google Scholar
[United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) [1960].]Search in Google Scholar
[United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV) [1970].]Search in Google Scholar
[United Nations, A more secure world: Our shared responsibility, Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change [2004].]Search in Google Scholar
[United Nations, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework” [2011].]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Staden A and Vollaard H, ‘The Erosion of State Sovereignty: Towards a Post-territorial World?’ in Gerard Kreijen et al (eds), State, Sovereignty, and International Governance (OUP 2002).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245383.003.0006]Search in Google Scholar
[de Vattel E, The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, with Three Early Essays on the Origin and Nature of Natural Law and on Luxury (LF ed 1797).]Search in Google Scholar
[Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.]Search in Google Scholar
[Villalpando S, ‘The Legal Dimension of the International Community: How Community Interests Are Protected in International Law’ (2010) 21 EJIL 387.10.1093/ejil/chq038]Search in Google Scholar
[Waisberg T, ‘Colombia's Use of Force in Ecuador Against a Terrorist Organization: International Law and the Use of Force Against Non-State Actors’ (2008) 12 ASIL Insights.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallace S, ‘Refining Al-Skeini v UK: The ECtHR’s Grand Chamber hearing in Jaloud v Netherlands’ (EJIL: Talk!, 7 March 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Zemanek K, ‘New Trends in the Enforcement of erga omnes Obligations’ (2000) 4 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 1.10.1163/187574100X00016]Search in Google Scholar
[Zimmermann A, ‘Palestine at the Gates of the Peace Palace: The long and windy road towards Palestinian membership in the Permanent Court of Arbitration’ (EJIL: Talk!, 5 April 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
