The Polish Constitutional Court from an Attitudinal and Institutional Perspective Before and After the Constitutional Crisis of 2015–2016

Baum L, Judges and their Audiences. A perspective on Judicial Behaviour (Princeton University Press 2006).10.1515/9781400827541Search in Google Scholar

Baum L, The Puzzle of Judicial Behaviour (Michigan University Press 2005).Search in Google Scholar

Bybee KJ, All Judges Are Political, Except When They Are Not (Stanford University Press 2010).Search in Google Scholar

Carter LH, Burke Thomas F, Reason in Law (New York: Pearson Longman 2007).Search in Google Scholar

Gallo F, Intervento al seminario di studi "L'opinione dissenziente", Conference held at the Italian Constitutional Court on the 22nd of June 2009 <http://www.cortecostituzionale.it/documenti/convegni_seminari/Relazione_Gallo_opinione.pdf> (accessed March 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Geyh CG, ‘Can Rule of Law Survive Judicial Politics?’ (2012) 97 Cornell Law Review.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson James L, ‘Judges Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An interactive Model’ (1978) 72 American Political Science Review 3.10.2307/1955111Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gillman H, Clayton CW, ‘Beyond Judicial Attitudes: Institutional Approaches to Supreme Court Decision- Making’ in CW Clayton, H Gillman (eds) Supreme Court Decision Making. New Institutionalist Approaches (University of Chicago Press 1999).Search in Google Scholar

Holmes OW, ‘The Path of the Law’ (1987) 10 Harvard Law Review 457.10.2307/1322028Search in Google Scholar

Leiter B, ‘Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What Is the Issue?’ (2010) 16 Legal Theory.10.1017/S1352325210000121Search in Google Scholar

MacCormick N, Rhetoric and the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press 2005).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571246.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mańko R, ‘Law, Politics and the Economy in Poland’s Post-Socialist Transformation: Preliminary Notes Towards an Investigation’ in Bálazs Fekete and Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz (eds), 25 Years After Transition in Central and Eastern Europe: Understanding the Transition from an Internal Perspective (Peter Lang 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Mańko R, ‘“War of Courts” as a Clash of Legal Cultures: Rethinking the Conflict between the Polish Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court Over “Interpretive Judgments” in Michael Hein, Antonia Geisler and Siri Hummel (eds), Law, Politics, and the Constitution: New Perspectives from Legal and Political Theory (Peter Lang 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Mańko R, Weeds in the Gardens of Justice? The Survival of Hyperpositivism in Polish Legal Culture as a Symptom/Sinthome (2013) 7.2 Pólemos 207.Search in Google Scholar

Maveety N, ‘The Study of Judicial Behaviour and the Discipline of Political Science’ in N Maveety (ed) The Pioneers of Judicial Behaviour (Michigan University Press 2003).10.3998/mpub.11980Search in Google Scholar

Matczak M, ‘Poland’s Constitutional Court under PiS control descends into legal chaos’< https://www.academia.edu/31940186/Polands_Constitutional_Court_under_PiS_control_descends_into_legal_chaos> (accessed March 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Morawski L, ‘Precedens a wykładnia’ [Precedent and Interpretation] (1996) 10 Państwo i Prawo.Search in Google Scholar

Morawski L, ‘Zasada trójpodziału władzy. Trybunał Konstytucyjny i aktywizm sędziowski’ (2009) 4/93 Przegląd Sejmowy.Search in Google Scholar

O’Brien DM, Institutional Norms and Supreme Court Opinions: On Reconsidering the Rise of Individual Opinions in CW Clayton, H Gillman (ed), Supreme Court Decision Making. New Institutionalist Approaches (University of Chicago Press 1999)Search in Google Scholar

Posner R, ‘The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline: 1962 -1987’ (1987) 100 Harvard Law Review.10.2307/1341093Search in Google Scholar

Pritchett HC, ‘The Development of Judicial Research’ in JB Grossman, J Tanenhaus (ed) Frontiers of Judicial Research (Wiley 1969).Search in Google Scholar

Raffaeli R, Dissenting opinions in the Supreme Courts of the Member States, European Parliament Policy Department C Study, PE 462.470 (European Parliament 2012).Search in Google Scholar

Ross L, Nisbett R, The Person and Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill New York 1991).Search in Google Scholar

Schubert G, Judicial Behaviour: A reader in Theory and Research (Rand McNally & Company Chicago 1964).Frontiers of Judicial Research (Wiley 1969).Search in Google Scholar

Segal JA, Spaeth HJ, The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal ModelSearch in Google Scholar

(Cambridge University Press 1993).Search in Google Scholar

Sulikowski A, ‘Government of Judges and Neoliberal Ideology’ inSearch in Google Scholar

Rafał Mańko, Cosmin Cercel and Adam Sulikowski (eds), Law and CritiqueSearch in Google Scholar

in Central Europe: Questioning the Past, Resisting the Present (CounterpressSearch in Google Scholar

2016).Search in Google Scholar

Sulikowski A, ‘Między tekstem, rozumem i polityką. Modernistyczne fundamenty wykładni konstytucji i ich praktyczne implikacje’ in Przemysław Kaczmarek (ed), Lokalny a uniwersalny charakter interpretacji prawniczej (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego 2009).Search in Google Scholar

Sulikowski A, ‘Trybunał Konstytucyjny a polityczność. O konsekwencjach upadku pewnego mitu’ [Constitutional Court and the Political: On the Consequences of Dispelling a Certain Myth] (2016) 4 Państwo i Prawo.Search in Google Scholar

Tushnet M, The United States: Eclecticism in the Service of Pragmatism, in J Goldsworthy (ed) Constitutional Interpretation (Oxford University Press 2006).Search in Google Scholar

Venkateswara B Rao, Crisis in Indian Judiciary (Michigan University Press 2001).Search in Google Scholar

Waldron J, Law and Disagreement (Oxford University Press 1999).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Walker TG, Epstein L, Dixon WJ, ‘On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court’ (1988) 50 Journal Of Politics.10.2307/2131799Open DOISearch in Google Scholar