Olga Kirsch se posisie in die Afrikaanse literêre sisteem (1900-1978) / Olga Kirsch’s Position in the Afrikaans Literary System (1900-1978)

Open access


Centrality and marginality are important concepts in polysystem theory, and also in network theory. This article examines Olga Kirsch’s position in the Afrikaans literary system by taking into account data spanning from 1900 to 1978. Overall centrality is discussed from the perspective of network theory and related to polysystem theory, and the concept is also applied to the literary system through the use of the Fruchterman and Reingold (1991) force-directed layout algorithm. It is indicated that Kirsch is positioned on the edge of the core or in the semicore, mainly because there are not so many people from the core who had paid attention to her works, but also because she, according to this data set, did not write on the works of others. It is also indicated which important critics, literary scholars and literary historians paid attention to her works, which contributes to her not being positioned on the periphery.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Barabási A.-L. en R. Albert. 1999. “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science 286: 509-511.

  • Barabási Albert-Lázló. 2011. “The Network Takeover.” Nature Physics 8 (1): 14-16.

  • Barnes J. en P. Hut. 1986. “A Hierarchical O(n log n) Force-Calculation Algorithm.” Nature 324 (4): 446-449.

  • Bonacich P. 1987. “Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures.” The American Journal of Sociology 92: 1170-1182.

  • Byrne David en Gill Callaghan. 2014. Complexity Theory and the Social Science: The State of the Art. Oxon: Routledge.

  • Christakis Nicholas en James Fowler. 2010. Connected. London: Harper.

  • Codde Philippe. 2003. “Polysystem Theory Revisited: A New Comparative Introduction.” Poetics Today (1): 91-126.

  • Csermely Péter András London Ling-Yun Wu en Brian Uzzi. 2013. “Structure and Dynamics of Core/Periphery Networks.” Journal of Complex Networks 1: 93-123.

  • Eades P. 1984. “A Heuristic for Graph Drawing.” Congressus Numerantium 42: 149-160.

  • Easley David en Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Networks Crowds and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Even-Zohar Itamar. 1979. “Polysystem Theory.” Poetics Today 1(1/2): 287-310.

  • _____. 1990. “Polysystem Studies.” Poetics Today 11(1): 1-94.

  • Freeman Linton C. 1979. “Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1 (3): 215-239.

  • Fruchterman Thomas M. J. en Edward M. Reingold. 1991. “Graph Drawing by Forcedirected Placement.” Software: Practice and experience 21 (11): 1129-1164.

  • Gaertler Marco en Dorothea Wagner. 2007. “Visualizing Large Complex Networks.” Large Scale Structure and Dynamics of Complex Networks: From Information Technology to Finance and Natural Science. Eds Guido Caldarelli en Alessandro Vespignani. London: World Scientific. 115-132

  • Granovetter Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360-1380.

  • Guimerá R. en L. A. N. Amaral. 2004. “Modeling the World-wide Airport Network.” Eur. Phys. J. B 38: 381-385.

  • Hoppe Bruce en Claire Reinelt. 2010. “Social Network Analysis and the Evaluation of Leadership Networks.” The Leadership Quarterly 21 (4): 600-619.

  • Hu Yifan. 2011. “Algorithms for Visualizing Large Networks.” Combinatorial Scientific Computing 5 (3): 180-186.

  • Kamada T. en S. Kawai. 1989. “An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs.” Information Processing Letters 31: 7-15.

  • Kobourov Stephen G. 2013. “Force-directed Drawing Algorithms.” Handbook of Graph Drawing and Visualization. Ed. Roberto Tamassia. Boca Raton Florida: CRC Press. 383-408

  • Martin Shawn W. M. Brown Richard Klavans en Kevin W. Boyack. 2011. “OpenOrd: An Open-source Toolbox for Large Graph Layout.” SPIE Proceedings Volume 7868 Visualization and Data Analysis. Eds Pak Chung Wong Jinah Park Ming C.

  • Hao Chaomei Chen Katy Börner David L. Kao Jonathan C. Roberts. SPIE / IS&T: Bellingham / Springfield. 1-11.

  • Milgram Stanley. 1967. “The Small World Problem.” Psychology Today 2: 60-67.

  • Newman Mark E. J. 2010. Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Quinn N. R. en M. A. Breuer. 1979. “A Force Directed Component Placement Procedure for Printed Circuit Boards.” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 26 (6): 377-388.

  • Rigney Ann. 2006. “Teksten en cultuurhistoriesche context.” Het leven van teksten: Een inleiding tot de literatuurwetenschap. Eds Kiene Brillenburg Wurth en Ann Rigney. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Schneider Marguerite en Mark Somers. 2006. “Organizations as Complex Adaptive Systems: Implications of Complexity Theory for Leadership Research.” The Leadership Quarterly 17 (4): 351-365.

  • Senekal Burgert A. 2012. “Die Afrikaanse literêre sisteem: ʼn Eksperimentele benadering met behulp van Sosiale-netwerk-analise (SNA ).” LitNet Akademies 9 (3): 614-638.

  • _____. 2013a. “Die gebruik van die netwerkteorie binne ʼn sisteemteoretiese benadering tot die Afrikaanse letterkunde: ʼn Teorie-oorsig.” Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 53 (4): 668-682.

  • _____. 2013b. “ʼn Netwerkontleding van die Afrikaanse poësienetwerk vanaf 2000 tot 2012.” Stilet 25 (2): 99-124.

  • _____. 2013c. “’n Bespreking van die Afrikaanse poësienetwerk sedert 2000.” LitNet. 10 Mei 2013. .

  • _____. 2014a. Canons and Connections: A Network Theory Approach to the Study of Literary Systems with Specific Reference to Afrikaans Poetry. Washington DC: New Academia.

  • _____. 2014b. “Die intellektuele struktuur van die Afrikaanse letterkunde: ’n Verwysingsontleding van artikels in die Afrikaanse letterkunde met behulp van netwerkanalise.” LitNet Akademies 11(2): 597-619.

  • Senekal Burgert A. en Jan-Ad Stemmet. 2014. “The Gods Must Be Connected: An Investigation of Jamie Uys’s Connections in the Afrikaans Film Industry Using Social Network Analysis (SNA ).” Communicatio 40 (1): 1-19.

  • Senekal Johannes H. 1985. “Die Afrikaanse letterkunde binne die literatuursisteem.” Handhaaf Junie: 20-22.

  • _____. 1986. ‘n Beskrywing van die Afrikaanse literatuursisteem. Ongepubliseerde RGN - verslag.

  • _____. 1987. Literatuuropvattings: ‘wese’ en ‘waarhede’ van ‘n nuwe literêre teorie. Bloemfontein: Universiteit van die Oranje-Vrystaat.

  • Senekal Johannes H. en Elmarie Engelbrecht. 1984. Bronne by die studie van Afrikaanse prosawerke 1900-1978. Johannesburg: Perskor.

  • Senekal Johannes H. en Karien Van Aswegen. 1980. Bronne by die studie van Afrikaanse dramas 1900-1978. Johannesburg: Perskor.

  • _____. 1981. Bronne by die studie van die Afrikaanse digbundels 1900-1978. Johannesburg: Perskor.

  • Sheffy Rakefet. 1990. “The Concept of Canonicity in Polysystem Theory.” Poetics Today 11 (3): 511-522.

  • Van Steen Maarten. 2010. Graph Theory and Complex Networks. n.p.: Van Steen. Verboord M. 2003. “Classification of Authors by Literary Prestige.” Poetics 31 (3): 259-81.

  • Viljoen Hein. 1984. “Die literêre sisteem van Dertig.” Literator 5 (1): 65-74.

  • _____. 1986. “Die Suid-Afrikaanse romansisteem. ‘n Vergelykende studie.” Diss. Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir Christelike Hoër Onderwys.

  • Von Bertalanffy Ludwig. 1968. General Systems Theory: Foundations Development Applications. New York: George Braziller.

  • _____. 1972. “The History and Status of General Systems Theory.” The Academy of Management Journal 15 (4): 407-426.

  • Walshaw Chris. 2003. “A Multilevel Algorithm for Force-Directed Graph Drawing.” Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications 7 (3): 253-285.

  • Watts D. J. en S. H. Strogatz. 1998. “Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-world’ Networks.” Nature 393 (6684): 409-410.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 261 83 2
PDF Downloads 134 55 7