We study size-at-age and sexual variability of morphometric characteristics of the marsh frog. According to the size of the body, males were divided into three size-age groups (juvenis, subadultus, adultus), females — into four groups (juvenis, subadultus, adultus, adultus-I). We found that the chronological age of frogs (skeletochronology) does not always correspond to their biological age (size and proportions of the body). We noted that the semi-adult males are reliably larger than females by mean values of 26 studied morphometric characters. Males and females of “adultus” group do not differ by linear body size, significant differences were found in body proportions (7 characters). For the females of “adultus-I” group, the mean values of 26 characters are significantly larger than for “adultus” males. The results of our study showed that with the age of the marsh frog, the level of exhibition, directionality and structure of morphometric sex differences changes.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Avramova O. S. Bulakhov V. L. Konstantinova N. F. 1976. Characteristics of reproduction tailless amphibians in the minds of Prisamar’ye. Issues of steppe forestry and nature conservation 173–181 [In Russian].
Alexandrovskaya T. O. 1981. Analysis of sexual dimorphism of the marsh frog (Rana ridibunda) within the range. The problems of herpetology 5−6 [In Russian].
Alexandrovskaya T. O. Kotova E. L. 1986. Preliminary data on the age characteristic of the marsh frog (Rana ridibunda Pallas) from three points of Armenia. Systematics and ecology of amphibians and reptiles: Proceedings of the Zoological Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences157 177–181 [In Russian].
Bannikov A. G. Darevskii I. S. Ishchenko V. G. Rustamov A. K. Shcherbak N. N. 1977. A guide for the amphibian and reptile fauna of the USSA M: Prosveshchenie 1–415 [In Russian].
Kleinenberg S. E. Smirina E. M. 1969. A contribution to the method of age determination in amphibians. Zool. Zh48 (7) 1070–1094 [In Russian].
Kukushkin O. V Ivanov A.Yu Ermakov O. A. 2018. On the genetic heterogeneity of the Crimean marsh frog population revealed by mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analysis (Pelophylax (ridibundus) complex; Anura Ranidae). University proceedings. Volga region. Natural Sciences. Zoology3 (23) 32–54.
Lakin G. F 1990. Biometrics. Vysshaya Shkola Moscow 1–293 [In Russian].
Lyapkov S. M. Cherdantsev V. G. Cherdantseva E. M. 2007. Sexual differences in growth rates and survival in Rana arvalis after metamorphosis. Zool. Zh.86 (4) 475–491.
Lyapkov S. M. Cherdantsev V. G. Cherdantseva E. M. 2009. Geographic variation of sexual dimorphism in the moor frog (Rana arvalis) as a result of differences in reproductive strategies. Journal of general biology71 (3) 241–262 [In Russian with English summery].
Mikitinez G. I. Suryadna N. M. 2007. Distribution and morphological characteristics of green frogs of the lower Dnepr. Scientific bulletin of the Uzhhorod university. Series Biology21 85–91 [In Ukrainian].
Nekrasova O. D. Morozov-Leonov S. Yu. 2001. Diagnostics of Frogs of Rana esculenta Complex (Amphibia Ranidae) in Hybrid Populations in the Environs of Dnieper. Vestnik Zoologii5 45−50 [In Russian].
Peskov V. N. Kotserzhynska I. M. 2004. Intrapopulational differentiation of the marsh frog Rana ridibunda (Amphibia Anura) according to length and body proportions. Vestnik Zoologii38 (5) 47–55 [In Russian].
Peskov V. N Kotserzhinska I. M. Manilo V. V. Pisanets E. M. 2004. Morphological differentiation and diagnostic of brown frogs Rana arvalisR. temporaria and R. dalmatina (Amphibia Ranidae) from the territory of Ukraine. Vestnik Zoologii38 (6) 29–40 [In Russian].
Peskov V. N Maliuk A. Yu. Petrenko N. A. 2017. The expressivity direction and structure of sexual differences in amphibians and reptiles: a case study on Rana temporaria Linnaeus 1758 and Lacerta viridis Laurenti 1768. Zb. Prac zool. muz. 48 54–69 [In Russian].
Peskov V. N. Petrenko N. A. 2014. Sexual differences in morphometry of green (Pelophylax) and brown (Rana) frogs (Ranidae Amphibia) of Ukraine fauna. Proceeding of the Ukranian Herpetological Society5 90–104 [In Russian].
Peskov V. N. Petrenko N. A. Reminnyi V. Yu. 2009. Interspecific differences and sexual dimorphism in body proportions in European green frogs (Amphibia Anura Ranidae) of the fauna of Ukraine. Zoological science in modern society: Materials of the All-Ukrainian scientific conference. Phytosociocenter Kyiv 369–374 [In Russian].
Pysanets E. M. 2007. The amphibians of Ukraine. Rayevsky scientific publishers Kyiv 1–192 [In Ukrainian].
Pysanets Ye. Kukushkin O. 2016. Amphibians of the Crimea. NAS of Ukraine National Museum of Natural History Kyiv 1–320.
Reminnyi V. Yu. 2007. Age structure of reproductive part of population of march frog Pelophylax ridibundus (Ranidae Amphibia). Zb. Prac. zool. muz.39 63–68 [In Ukrainian].
Smirina E. M. 1989. Method for determining the age of amphibians and reptiles by bone layers. In: Scherbak N. N. Guide to the study of amphibians and reptiles. Kiev book publishing house of a scientific book Kiev 144–153 [In Russian].
Taraschuk V. I. 1959. Amphibians and reptiles. Fauna of Ukraine Vol. 7. The publishing house of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR Kiev 1–246 [In Ukrainian].
Khalafyan A. A. 2007. STATISTICA 6. Statistical analysis of data. Binom Moscow 1–512 [In Russian].
Shabanov D. A. Korshunov A. V. Kravchenko M. A. Meleshko E. V. Shabanova A. V. Usova E. E. 2014. The intrapopulation developmental strategies of precocity and stuntedity: determination by the example of anurans. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: biology22 (1126) 115–124 [In Russian].
Scherbak N. N. 1966. Amphibians and reptiles of Crimea. Naukova Dumka Kiev 1–240 [In Russian].
Scherbak N. N. Scherban M. I. 1980. Amphibians and reptiles of Carpathians. Naukova Dumka Kiev 1–268 [In Russian].
Shine R. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the amphibian. Copeia (2) 297–306.
Yilmaz N. Kutrup Y. N. Ìobanoðlu B. Özoran Y. 2005. Age determination and some growth parametrs of a Rana ridibunda population in Turkey. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hungar.51 (1) 67–74.