Sex Differences and Sex Identification in the Small-Scaled Scorpionfish, Scorpaena Porcus (Scorpaenidae, Scorpaeniformes)

V. N. Peskov 1  and L. G. Manilo 1
  • 1 National Museum of Natural History at the NAS of Ukraine, B. Khmel’nitskogo st., 15, Kyiv, 01601,Ukraine


Sex differences and the ability to determine the sex of Scorpaena porcus (Linnaeus, 1758) on morphological characters were studied in the population inhabiting coastal waters of the Black Sea near the southern coast of Crimea. These differences were revealed in size (females are larger than males) and in proportions of the body. It is found that variation of the absolute and relative values in plastic characters is higher in females compared with males. It is shown that in 92 % of individuals belonging to S. porcus we can determine the sex using morphological characters with a probability of 99.9-100 %.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bilgin, S., Celik, E. Ş. 2009. Age, growth and reproduction of the black scorpionfi sh, Scorpaena porcus (Pisces, Scorpaenidae), on the Black Sea coast of Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25, 55-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01157.x.

  • Dzeverin, I. I., Lashkova, E. I. 2006. Opportunities and Restrictions for Some Algorithms of the Discriminant Function Analysis in Identifi cation of Closely Related Species: a Case of Wood Mice Sylvaemus (Rodentia, Muridae). Vestnik Zoologii, 40 (1), 63-69 [In Russian].

  • Ferri, J., Petrić, M., Matić-Skoko, S. 2010. Biometry analysis of the black scorpionfi sh, Scorpaena porcus (Linnaeus, 1758) from the eastern Adriatic Sea. Acta Adriatica, 51 (1), 45-54.

  • Froese, R., Pauly, D., eds. 2012. Scorpaenidae. FishBase. December 2012 version.

  • Lakin G. F. 1990. Biometry. A manual for biologists specialized high schools. 4-th ed., revised and enlarged. Vysschaja shkola, Moscow, 1-352 [In Russian].

  • La Mesa, M., Scarcella, G., Grati, F., Fabi, G. 2010. Age and growth of the black scorpionfi sh, Scorpaena porcus (Pisces: Scorpaenidae) from artifi cial structures and natural reefs in the Adriatic Sea. Scientia Marina, 74 (4), 677-685. DOI: 10.3989/scimar.2010.74n4677.

  • Manilo, L. G., Peskov, V. N. 2012 a. Morphological Divergence and Diagnostic Characters of Ginger Goby Neogobius eurycephalus (Kessler, 1874) and Surman Goby N. cephalargoides Pinchuk, 1976 (Perciformes, Gobiidae). Journal of Ichthyology, 52 (1), 26-33. DOI: 10.1134/S0032945211050092.

  • Manilo, L. G., Peskov, V. N. 2012 b. On the Identification of Ginger Goby Neogobius eurycephalus (Kessler, 1874) and Pinchuk’s oby N. cephalargoides Pinchuk, 1976 (Perciformes, Gobiidae). Suchasni problemy teoretichnoi ta praktichnoi ichtiologii. Materialy V mizhnarodnoi ichtiologichnoi naukovo-praktichnoi konferenzii, prisvjachenoi pamjati I. D. Shnarevicha (13-16 veresnja 2012 roku). Chernivtsi, 148-152 [In Russian].

  • Pashkov, A. N., Shevchenko, N. F., Oven, L. S., Giragosov, V. E., Kruglov, M. V. 1999. Distribution, numbers, and principal population index of Scorpaena porcus under anthropogenic pollution of the Black Sea. Voprosy ikhtiologii, 39 (5), 661-668 [In Russian].

  • Peskov, V. N., Maljuk, A. Y., Petrenko, N. A. 2013. Linear Dimensions of Body and Biological Age of Amphibians and Reptiles on Example of Lacerta agilis (Linnaeus, 1758) и Pelophylax ridibundus (Pallas, 1771). Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Ser. Estestvennie i technicheskie nauk, 18 (6), 3055-3058 [In Russian].

  • Pravdin, I. F. 1966. Guide to the study of fi shes. Pishchevaja promyshlennost, Moscow, 1-376 [In Russian].

  • Scarcella, G., Grati, F., Polidori, P., Domenichetti, F., Bolognini, L., Fabi, G. 2011. Comparison of growth rates estimated by otolith reading of Scorpaena porcus and Scorpaena notata caught on artifi cial and natural reefs of the northern Adriatic sea. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 59 (spec. is. CARAH), 33-42.

  • Smirnov, A. I. 1986. Fauna of Ukraine. Vol. 8. Fishes. Is. 5. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1-320.

  • Svetovidov, A. N. 1964. Fishes of the Black Sea. Nauka, Moscow, Leningrad, 1-550 [In Russian].

  • Turan, C., Gunduz, I., Gurlek, M., Yaglioglu, D., Erguden, D. 2009. Systematics of Scorpaeniformes Species in the Mediterranean Sea Inferred from Mitochondrial 16S rDNA Sequence and Morphological Data. Folia biologica (Kraków), 57 (1-2), 219-226. DOI: 10.3409/fb 57_1-2.219-226.

  • Vasil’eva, E. D. 2007. Fish of the Black sea. Key to Marine, Brackish-water, Euryhaline, and Anadromous Species with Color Illustrations Collected by S. V. Bogorodsky. VNIRO Publishing, Moscow, 1-238 [In Russian].


Journal + Issues