Influence of Human Disturbance on the Abundance of Himalayan Pheasant (Aves, Galliformes) in the Temperate Forest of Western Himalaya, India

V. Jolli 1  and M. Pandit 1
  • 1 Centre for Inter-disciplinary Studies of Mountain & Hill Environment Academic Research Building, University of Delhi, Patel Road, Delhi, India

Influence of Human Disturbance on the Abundance of Himalayan Pheasant (Aves, Galliformes) in the Temperate Forest of Western Himalaya, India

We conducted field studies in the Jiwa valley (Indian Himalayas) to examine the influence of human disturbance on Himalayan pheasants. We used the "call count" and "line transect" methods to estimate the abundance of pheasants in Jiwa valley. A human disturbance gradient defined by human population, agriculture activity, forest wood collection, grazing, vehicle, use of heavy machines, human settlements, dumping ground, and blasting was prepared. We assessed the pheasant numbers under two conditions (1) a decline in the gradient of human activity during two consecutive years (2009-2010) (2) in the presence of hydroelectric development activities. The numbers of koklass pheasants, Himalayan monal, cheer pheasant and Western tragopan declined significantly with anthropogenic activities. During spring 2010, hydroelectric construction activity was temporarily suspended in Manjhan adit, and a positive response was noted in terms of an increase in the pheasant numbers near the site. The response of pheasants to human disturbance has inferred that large scale development can lead to decline of Himalayan pheasant in Himalayan region.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ali S., Ripley S. D. Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan. — New Delhi : Oxford University Press, 1983. — Vol. 1-10.

  • Anonymous. Threatened birds of Asia. — Cambridge : Birdlife International, 2001.

  • Bhattacharya T., Sathyakumar S., Rawat G. Distribution and abundance of Galliformes in response to anthropogenic pressures in the buffer zone of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve // International J. Galliformes Conservation. — 2009. — 1. — P. 78-84.

  • Central Electricity Authority (CEA) (2009) Status of 50,000 MW hydroelectric initiative, 31 August 2009. —

  • CISMHE. Environment impact assessment studies of Parvati Stage-II hydro-electric project, Himachal Pradesh. — New Delhi : University of Delhi, 2000.

  • Duke G. Using call count surveys to obtain comparative population figures for western tragopan in NWFP Pakistan // Pheasants in Asia 1989 / Eds D. A. Hill, P. J. Garson, D. Jenkins. — Reading : World Pheasant Association, 1990. — P. 116-123.

  • Fuller R. A., Garson P. J. Pheasants: status survey and conservation action plan 2000-2004. — Cambridge : IUCN Publications Services Unit, 2000.

  • FREEP-GHNP. An ecological study of the conservation of biodiversity and biotic pressure in Great Himalayan National Park: An eco-development approach. Project proposal to World Bank / GEF, 1995.

  • Gaston A. J., Garson P. J., Hunter M. L. The status and conservation of forest wildlife in Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalayas // Biological Conservation. — 1983. — 27. — P. 291-314.

  • Gaston A. J. Census techniques for Himalayan Pheasants, including notes on individual species // Journal of the World Pheasant Association. — 1980. — 5. — P. 40-53.

  • Gaston A. J., Garson P. J., Hunter M. L. Present distribution and status of pheasants in Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalayas // J. World Pheasant Association. — 1981. — 6. — P. 10-30.

  • Hammer III., Harper D. A. T., Ryan P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistical software package for education and data analysis // Paleontological Electronica. — 2001. — 4, 1. — P. 9.

  • Kaul R. Ecology of the Cheer pheasant Catreus wallichii in Kumaon Himalaya : Ph. D. thesis. — Srinagar : University of Kashmir, 1989. — Unpublished.

  • Khaling S., Kaul R., Saha G. K. Calling behavior and its significance in Satyr tragopan, Tragopan satyra (Galliformes: Phasianidae) in the Singhalila National Park, Darjeeling // Proceedings of the Zoological Society. — Calcutta, 2002. — 55. — P. 1-9.

  • Kazmierczak K. A Field Guide To The Birds Of India. — India : OM publication, 2009.

  • McGowan P. J. K. Calling as a means to survey the Malaysian Peacock Pheasant: a preliminary assessment / Eds D. A. Hill, P. J. Garson, D. Jenkins // Pheasants in Asia 1989. — Reading : World Pheasant Association, 1990. — P. 110-115.

  • Miller J. R. B., Ramesh K., Rawat G. S. Pheasant population recovery as an indicator of biodiversity conservation in the Great Himalayan National Park, India. — Dehradun : The Wildlife Institute of India, 2008.

  • Nawaz R., Garson P., Malik M. Monitoring pheasant populations in montane forests: some lessons learnt from the Pakistan Galliformes Project, 1999. — (

  • Ramesh K. An ecological study on pheasants of The Great Himalayan National Park, Western Himalaya. — Dehradun : Wildlife Institute of India, 2003.

  • Ryals B., Dooling R., Westbrook E., Dent M., Mackenzie A., Larsen O. Avian species differences in susceptibility to noise exposure // Hearing Research. — 1999. — 131. — P. 71-88.

  • Sathyakumar S., Kaul R. Pheasants // Galliformes of India, ENVIS / Eds S. Sathyakumar, K. Sivakumar. — 2007. — 10, 1. — P. 33-51.

  • Schoener T. W. Size of feeding territories among birds // Ecology. — 1968. — 49. — P. 123-141.

  • Severinghaus S. R. Observations on the ecology and behaviour of the Koklass pheasant in Pakistan // Journal of the World Pheasant Association. — 1979. — 4. — P. 52- 71.

  • Soh M. C. K., Sodhi, N. S., Lim S. L. H. High sensitivity of montane bird communities to habitat disturbance in Peninsular Malaysia // Conservation Biology. — 2006. — 129. — P. 149-166.

  • UNESCO. Great Himalayan National Park / World Heritage. — 2009.-

  • White P. S., Pickett S. T. A. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction // The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics accessed / Eds P. S. White, S. T. A. Pickett. — New York : Academic Press, 1985. — P. 3-13.