Entrepreneurial spirit plays an increasingly important role in the economic sphere, and universities are meant to play a central role in this process, where the main objective is the continuous development and mediation of the knowledge increasingly geared to the applications through innovation and patenting a secure platform for employment and well-being growth. The Universities have to take a position in if/and how they want to grow into a so-called “University of Entrepreneurship” which is characterized by a high degree of openness to the surrounding society and here we are talking, especially, about, the business sector in Romania. This evolution of expectations for the social role of universities has resulted from increased and recent interest in entrepreneurship and innovation of areas as research and theory of the business environment. The experience gained as teachers indicates that education and entrepreneurship education should include different theories and methodology than those applied in the usual way. The theory of traditional management and microeconomic models could even be a barrier to new thinking and change and, therefore, to the implementation of modern entrepreneurial actions. We want this article to be a source of inspiration for educational institutions and to have a positive contribution to research in business education and to be applicable in business decision-making.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Abell, D. F. (1980): “Defining the Business – the Starting Point of Strategic Planning”, Prentice Hall.
Bechard, J.-P. & J.-M. Toulouse (1998): “Validation of a didactic model for the analysis of the training objectives in entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 13, pp. 317-332.
Fiet, J. O. (2000): “The Theoretical Side of Teaching Entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 16: 1-24.
Garavan, T. N. & O’Cinneide, B., (1994) ”Entrepreneurship Education and Training Programmes: A Review and Evaluation – Part 1”, Journal of European Industrial Training, vol. 18 (8): 3-12.
Gibb, A. (2002) “In pursuit of a new ‘enterprise’ and ‘entrepreneurship’ paradigm for learning: creative deconstruction, new values, new ways of doing things and new combinations of knowledge.” International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 4, issue 3: 233-269.
Johannisson, B. & Lundberg, H. (2002): “Entrepreneurship as Breaking and Making Sense – Learning Beyond Boundaries”, RENT XVI – Research in Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Barcelona, 21.-22. November 2002.
Kirzner, I. M. (1973) “Competition and Entrepreneurship”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kjeldsen, J.; Nielsen, K. (2004) “Growth Creating Entrepreneurs: What are their characteristics and impact, and can they be created?”, in GEMreport 2003, Børsens Forlag.
Kyrö, P. & C. Carrier (2005) “The dynamics of Learning Entrepreneurship in a Cross Cultural University Context”, Entrepreneurship Education Series 2/2005, Hämeenlinna, Finland.
Laukkanen, M. (2000):”Exploring Alternative Approaches in High-Level Entrepreneurship Education: creating micro-mechanisms for endogenous regional growth”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, vol. 12 2000: 25-47.
Schumpeter J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.
Şerbănică, C., 2008.. ”The ethical behavior, the support of the corporate reputation”, the „Economic Amphitheater” Magazine, 23, pp.119-124.