East Asian Technical Cooperation Initiatives in Central America: A Comparative Analysis of Japan and South Korea in Guatemala

Open access

Abstract

This article describes the similarities and differences of Japanese and South Korean technical co-operation approaches in Guatemala. The literature review illustrates the transition from an initially donor-centric results chain approach towards one that is increasingly recipient-balanced due to new cooperation principles such as horizontality and demand-drivenness. Such approaches are mainly fostered by the rise of new emerging donors on the international development cooperation horizon, such as the advocates of South-South Development Cooperation (SSDC).

An analysis based on a framework by the Network of Southern Think Tanks (NeST) concludes that Japanese and Korean technical cooperation approaches are markedly similar, most notably in regard to officially proclaimed technical cooperation standards and commitments. Differences result from the degree of related implementation: Japan achieves higher results based on relative deficiencies in reporting by Korea as well as comparatively shorter bilateral Korean-Guatemalan relations. Similarities are fostered by analogous institutional and project related structures, stemming from an argued learning and simulation approach by Korea from the long-standing experiences of Japan. Lastly, it is argued that the growing assimilation of the traditional and the SSDC concept, as well as the increasing engagement of both countries in triangular cooperation contribute to the identified similarities.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ali Murad. 2018. “Monitoring and Evaluation in South-South Cooperation: The Case of CPEC in Pakistan.” German Development Institute Discussion Paper 1 pp. 1–36.

  • Alonso Jonathan and José Glennie. 2015. “What Is Development Cooperation?” Development Co-operation Forum Policy Brief 1 pp. 1–5.

  • Ashoff Guido. 2010. “Triangular Cooperation: Opportunities Risks and Conditions for Effectiveness.” Online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6081 (accessed: September 17 2018).

  • Bandura Romina and MacKenzie Hammond. 2019. A Demand-Driven Approach to Development. A CSIS Primer. Washington D.C.: Center for Strategic & International Studies.

  • Barascout Maria. 2015. “La Cooperación internacional de Japón hacia Guatemala en el ámbito educativo caso Guatemática en el periodo 2009-2012.” M.A. thesis Universidad Rafael Landívar Guatemala.

  • Baumann Max-Otto. 2018. “Mission Impossible? Country-level Coordination in the UN Development System.” German Development Institute Discussion Paper 7 pp. 1–48.

  • Bergström Lennart. 2002. “Methods for Capacity Development: A Report for Sida’s Project Group ‘Capacity Development as a Strategic Question.’” SIDA Working Paper 10 pp. 1–23.

  • Birdsall Nancy and Homi Kharas. 2010. Quality of Official Development Assistance Assessment. Washington D.C.: Center for Global Development.

  • Bloomberg. 2018. “Emerging Markets Start 2018 with Politics Center Stage.” Online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-02/emerging-markets-start-2018-with-politics-and-inflation-in-focus] (accessed: May 24 2018).

  • Buiter Willem. 2005. “Country Ownership: A Term Whose Time Has Gone.” In Stefan Koeberle Harold Bedoya Peter Silarsky and Gero Verheyen eds. Conditionality Revisited Concepts Experiences and Lessons. Washington D.C.: The World Bank pp. 27–33.

  • Business Insider. 2018. “China’s Latest Triumph Over Taiwan Points to Its Growing Influence in the US’s Neighborhood.” Online: http://www.businessinsider.com/china-influence-over-tai-wan-in-latin-america-2018-5 (accessed: May 24 2018).

  • Christensen Zachary Richard Nielsen Daniel Nielson and Michael Tierney. 2011. “Transparency Squared: The Effects of Donor Transparency on Aid Recipients’ Corruption Levels.” International Political Economy Society Meeting Paper pp. 1–43.

  • CID (Council for International Development). 2012. “Ownership: A Brief Overview of Ownership within Development.” CID Fact Sheet 8 pp. 1–2.

  • Coe Jim and Juliette Majot. 2013. “Monitoring Evaluation and Learning in NGO Advocacy: Findings from Comparative Policy Advocacy.” MEL Review Project pp. 1–67.

  • Dahi Omar and Firat Demir. 2017. “South-South and North-South Economic Exchanges: Does it Matter Who is Exchanging What and With Whom?” Journal of Economic Surveys 31 (5) pp. 1449–1486.

  • Del Biondo Karen. 2015. “Moving beyond a Donor-Recipient Relationship? Assessing Partnership in the Joint Africa-EU Strategy.” KFG Working Paper 63 pp. 1–30.

  • De Oliveira Joana. 2017. “Paths for Developing South-South Cooperation: Monitoring and Evaluation Systems.” BRICS Policy Center and South-South Cooperation Research and Policy Centre Report pp. 1–44.

  • Development Finance International. 2010. “Republic of Korea (South Korea).” Country Profile Report pp. 1–11.

  • El Periódico. 2017. “Banco Industrial obtiene línea de crédito por US$30 millones con Korea Eximbank.” Online: https://elperiodico.com.gt/inversion/2017/04/04/banco-industrial-obtiene-linea-de-credito-por-us30-millones-con-korea-eximbank/ (accessed: June 29 2018).

  • El Periódico. 2018. “Corea del Sur ofrece crédito para Puerto Santo Tomás.” Online: https://elperi-odico.com.gt/inversion/2017/10/05/corea-del-sur-ofrece-credito-para-puerto-santo-tomas/ (accessed: June 27 2018).

  • Embajada de Japón en Guatemala. 2018. “Relaciones Bilaterales: Relaciones entre Japón y Guatemala.” Online: http://www.gt.emb-japan.go.jp/relaciones_bilaterales1.htm#fechas (accessed: June 3 2018).

  • Embajada de la República de Corea en Guatemala. 2018. “[Noticias recientes sobre KOICA] Información sobre Proyectos.” Online: http://overseas.mofa.go.kr/gt-es/brd/m_5605/view.do?seq=697740&srchFr=&srchTo=&srch-Word=&srchTp=&multi_itm_seq=0&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&page=9 (accessed: June 10 2018).

  • European Commission. 2009. “Making Technical Cooperation More Efficient.” Tools and Methods Series: Guidelines 3 pp. 1–156.

  • Eyben Rosalind. 2008. “Power Mutual Accountability and Responsibility in the Practice of International Aid: A Relational Approach.” IDS Working Paper 305 pp. 1–51.

  • Faure Anaïs. 2016. “South Korea’s Role in East Asia-Latin America Cooperation.” Online: https://thediplomat.com/2016/10/south-koreas-role-in-east-asia-latin-america-cooperation/ (accessed: May 3 2018).

  • FIDC (Forum for Indian Development Cooperation). 2014. “Features of South-South Cooperation and Global Dynamics.” FIDC Policy Brief 1 pp. 1–4.

  • Frontera. 2016. “Why South Korea Remains Classified as an Emerging Market.” Online: https://frontera.net/news/asia/emerging-markets-investment-in-south-korea-a-market-with-characteristics-similar-to-developed-markets/ (accessed: May 24 2018).

  • Garbarino Sabine and Jeremy Holland. 2009. “Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Impact Evaluation and Measuring Results.” GSD-RC Governance and Social Development Resource Center Issues Paper pp. 1–41.

  • Godfrey Martin Chan Sophal Toshiyasu Kato Long Piseth Pon Dorina Tep Saravy Tia Savora and So Sovannarith. 2002. “Technical Assistance and Capacity Development in an Aid-Dependent Economy: The Experience of Cambodia.” World Development 30 (3) pp. 355–373.

  • Gore Charles. 2013. “The New Development Cooperation Landscape: Actors Approaches Architecture.” Journal of International Development 25 pp. 769–786.

  • Gray Kevin and Barry Gills. 2016. “South-South Cooperation and the Rise of the Global South.” Third World Quarterly 37 (4) pp. 557–574.

  • Haider Huma. 2008. “Demand-Driven Technical Assistance.” GSD RC Research Report pp. 1–

  • Holzapfel Sarah. 2014. “The Role of Indicators in Development Cooperation: An Overview Study with a Special Focus on the Use of Key and Standard Indicators.” German Development Institute Studies pp. 1–252.

  • IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2016. “Achieving More Equality and Stronger Growth in Guatemala.” IMF Dialogo al Fondo pp. 1–3.

  • Infile. 2018. “Convenios.” Online: https://leyes.infile.com/index.php?id=145&pagina_publicaciones=0&tipo_documento=&texto_buscador=corea (accessed: August 15 2017).

  • INTRAC (International Training and Research Center). 2012. “The Busan Partnership: Implications for Civil Society.” Policy Briefing Paper 29 pp. 1–16.

  • Janus Heiner Klingebiel Stephan and Sebastian Paulo. 2014. “Beyond Aid: A Conceptual Perspective on the Transformation of Development Cooperation.” CDDRL Working Paper 12 pp. 1–17.

  • Jerve Alf. 2007. “Asian Models for Aid: Is There a Non-Western Approach to Development Assistance?” CMI Report 12 pp. 1–9.

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2010. “New JICA Guidelines for Project Evaluation.” JICA Evaluation Department Report pp. 1–83.

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2016 [1]. “El inicio del Proyecto- La implementación del primer Comité de Coordinación Conjunta (CCC).” Online: https://www.jica.go.jp/project/spanish/guatemala/004/news/general/160627.html (accessed: August 13 2018).

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2016 [2]. JICA Annual Evaluation Report 2016. Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency.

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [1]. “Prioridades de Cooperación.” Online: https://www.jica.go.jp/guatemala/espanol/activities/activity01.html (accessed: June 6 2018).

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [2]. “Guatemala.” Online: https://www.jica.go.jp/guatemala/english/index.html (accessed: June 6 2018).

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [3]. “Map of JICA Major Projects in Guate-mala.” Online: https://www.jica.go.jp/guatemala/english/activities/index.html (accessed: June 6 2018).

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [4]. “Result of Ex-Post Evaluation Report.” Online: https://www2.jica.go.jp/en/evaluation/index.php?anken=&country1=Guate-mala&area2=&country2=&area3=&country3=&field1=&field2=&field3=&start_from=&start_to=&search=Search (accessed: June 6 2018).

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [5]. “Guatemala: List of Projects.” Online: https://www.jica.go.jp/project/english/area/c_america/228_1.html (accessed: June 6 2018).

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [6]. “ODA Loan Project Data.” Online: https://www2.jica.go.jp/en/yen_loan/index.php (accessed: June 15 2018).

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [7]. “Resumen del Proyecto.” Online: https://www.jica.go.jp/project/spanish/guatemala/004/outline/index.html (accessed: August 13 2018).

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [8]. “Ex-post Evaluation Report.” Online: https://www2.jica.go.jp/en/evaluation/index.php?anken=Guatemala&area1=Latin+America&country1=&area2=&country2=&area3=&country3=&field1=&field2=&field3=&start_from=&start_to=&fiscal_from=&fiscal_to=&search=Search (accessed: August 15 2018).

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [9]). “Operations Evaluation in JICA.” Online: https://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/evaluation/about.html] (accessed: August 15 2018).

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [10]). “Technical Cooperation Projects.” Online: https://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/types_of_assistance/tech/projects/index.html (accessed: September 9 2018).

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [11]). “Programa de Co-creación de Conocimientos.” JICA Programme Report pp. 1–15.

  • JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [12]). “Public-Private Partnerships.” Online: https://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/types_of_assistance/partnership/index.html (accessed: September 12 2018).

  • Jordhus-Lier David Marit Haug and Hari Regmi. 2009. “Demand-Driven Governance. An Analysis of the Interventions of International Aid Agencies.” NIBR Working Paper 118 pp. 1–39.

  • Jung Jione Yul Kwon Jisun Jeong Sukyung Park and Jooyoung Lee. 2011. “South-South and Triangular Cooperation: Trends and Implications for Korea: Summary.” Online: http://www.kiep.go.kr/eng/sub/view.do?bbsId=policyAnalyses&nttId=185581 (accessed: May 24 2018).

  • Kharas Homi. 2013. “Transparency: Changing the Accountability Engagement and Effectiveness of Aid.” In Homi Kharas Koji Makino and Woojin Jung eds. Catalyzing Development: A New Vision for Aid. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press pp. 233–259.

  • Kim Hyo-Sook. 2017. “Poverty Reduction and ODA Policymaking in Japan and South Korea.” Journal of Inquiry and Research 105 pp. 91–108.

  • King Cheryl. 2014. “Partnership Effectiveness Continuum: A Research-Based Tool for Use in Developing Assessing and Improving Partnerships.” EDC Report pp. 1–21.

  • Kitano Naohiro. 2014. “Japan’s Experiences on South-South and Triangular Cooperation.” Online: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/3-2_Kitano.pdf (accessed: September 17 2018).

  • KOICA (Korea International Cooperation Agency). 2011. “Ex-Post Evaluation Report for KOICA Community Development Project for the Resettled Population in Guatemala.” Online: http://www.koica.go.kr/english/resources/Evaluation/Evaluation_Reports/index.html] (accessed: June 17 2018).

  • KOICA (Korea International Cooperation Agency). 2013. “Ex-post Evaluation Report on the Program for the Improvement of Maternal and Child Health in Chimaltenango.” Online: http://www.koica.go.kr/english/resources/Evaluation/Evaluation_Reports/index.html (accessed: June 17 2018).

  • KOICA (Korea International Cooperation Agency). 2016. “Annual Report 2016.” Online: http://www.koica.go.kr/english/resources/annual_reports/index.html (accessed: June 17 2018).

  • KOICA (Korea International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [1]. “Korea International Cooperation Agency.” Online: http://www.koica.go.kr/english/main.html (accessed: June 18 2018).

  • KOICA (Korea International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [2]. “Evaluation Report.” Online: http://www.koica.go.kr/english/resources/Evaluation/Evaluation_Reports/index.html (accessed: June 17 2018).

  • KOICA (Korea International Cooperation Agency). 2018 [3]. “Type of Evaluation.” [Online: http://www.koica.go.kr/english/resources/Evaluation/Type_of_evaluation/index.html] (accessed: August 15 2018).

  • KOICA Guatemala. 2018 [1]. “Misión de KOICA.” Online: http://www.koicabeca.org.gt/quienes-somos.html (accessed: June 13 2018).

  • KOICA Guatemala. 2018 [2]. “Cooperación en Guatemala.” Online: http://www.koi-cabeca.org.gt/koica-guatemala.html (accessed: June 13 2018).

  • KOICA Guatemala. 2018 [3]. “Estrategia para la Cooperación de KOICA.” Online: http://www.koicabeca.org.gt/index.html (accessed: June 19 2018).

  • KOICA Guatemala. 2018 [4]. “Intercambio de Conocimientos.” Online: http://www.koi-cabeca.org.gt/intercambio-de-conocimientos.html (accessed: June 20 2018).

  • KOICA Guatemala. 2018 [5]. “Seminars.” Online: http://www.koicabeca.org.gt/seminarios.html (accessed: June 21 2018).

  • KOICA Guatemala. 2018 [6]. “Actividades de Voluntariado.” Online: http://www.koi-cabeca.org.gt/actividades-de-voluntariado.html (accessed: June 21 2018).

  • KOICA Stats. 2018. “KOICA Statistical Service.” Online: http://stat.koica.go.kr/ipm/os/acms/smrizeBsrList.do?lang=en (accessed: June 17 2018).

  • Kondoh Hisato. 2012. “Korea’s Pathway from Recipient to Donor: How Does Japan Matter?” In J. Sato and Y. Shimomura eds. The Rise of Asian Donor: Japan’s Impact on the Evolution of Emerging Donors. Routledge: London pp. 133–154.

  • Kondoh Hisato. 2015. “Convergence of Aid Models in Emerging Donors? Learning Processes Norms and Identities and Recipients.” JICA Working Paper 106 pp. 1–60.

  • Kondoh Hisato Takaaki Kobayashi Hiroaki Shiga and Jin Sato. 2010. “Diversity and Transfor-mation of Aid Patterns in Asia’s ‘Emerging Donors.’” JICA Working Paper 21 pp. 1–78.

  • Lucas Brian. 2013. “Current Thinking on Capacity Development.” GSDRC Research Report pp. 1–13.

  • Maggiorelli Lorenzo. 2017. “Chinese Aid to Latin America and the Caribbean: Evolution and Prospect.” ELACID Artículo Resultado de Investigación pp. 28–50.

  • Marx Axel and Jadir Soares. 2013. “South Korea’s Transition from Recipient to DAC Donor: Assessing Korea’s Development Cooperation Policy.” International Development Policy 4 (2) pp. 107–142.

  • Mawdsley Emma. 2012 [1]. “The Changing Geographies of Foreign Aid and Development Cooperation: Contributions from Gift Theory.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series 37 (2) pp. 256–272.

  • Mawdsley Emma. 2012 [2]. From Recipient to Donors: Emerging Powers and the Changing Development Landscape. London: Zed Books.

  • Mawdsley Emma. 2017. “Development Geography 1: Cooperation Competition and Convergence between ‘North’ and ‘South.’” Progress in Human Geography 41 (1) pp. 108–117.

  • McGee Rosemary. 2013. “Aid Transparency and Accountability: ‘Build it and They’ll Come?’” Development Policy Review 31 pp. 107–124.

  • Menocal Alina and Lisa Denney. 2011. “Informing the Future of Japan’s ODA. Part One: Locating Japan’s ODA within a Crowded and Shifting Marketplace.” ODI Report pp. 1–42.

  • MFDR (Managing for Development Results). 2007. “Monitoring and Evaluation: Enhancing Development Results.” Third International Roundtable on Managing for Development Results in Hanoi pp. 1–9.

  • MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan). 2010. “Japan’s Official Development Assistance White Paper.” Online: https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2010/html/hon-bun/b2/s2_3_2.html (accessed: September 8 2018).

  • MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan). 2018 [1]. “Official Development Assistance.” Online: http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/cooperation/anniv50/pamphlet/progress1.html (accessed: May 24 2018).

  • MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan). 2018 [2]. “Country Assistance Policy for Respective Countries.” Online: https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/assistance/country2.html (accessed: June 15 2018).

  • MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan). 2018 [3]. “Japan-Guatemala Relations (Basic Data).” Online: https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/latin/guatemala/data.html (accessed: September 11 2018).

  • Montinola Gabriella. 2007. “When Does Aid Conditionality Work?” Studies in Comparative International Development 45 (3) pp. 358–438.

  • MSPAS (Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social). 2018. “MSPAS: Proyecto de cooperación de JICA muestra avances en su primer año de acción en Quiché.” Online: http://www.mspas.gob.gt/index.php/noticias/noticias-mspas/item/317-mspas-proyecto-de-cooperacion-de-jica-muestra-avances-en-su-primer-ano-de-accion-en-quiche (accessed: August 13 2018).

  • Narasaiah Lakshmi. 2003. The Role of Micro Credit and NGOs in Economic Development. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.

  • Naylor William. 2017. “A Shifting Trade Landscape in Latin America Favors China and Globalization.” Online: https://theglobalamericans.org/2017/07/shifting-trade-landscape-latin-america-favors-china-globalization/ (accessed: May 24 2018).

  • ODA Korea. 2014. Korea’s ODA White Paper. Seoul: CIDC.

  • ODA Korea. 2017. Korea’s ODA White Paper. Seoul: CIDC.

  • ODA Korea. 2018 [1]. “Korea Official Development Assistance.” Online: http://www.odako-rea.go.kr/ez.main.ODAEngMain.do (accessed: June 9 2018).

  • ODA Korea. 2018 [2]. “Country Partnership Strategy.” Online: http://www.odako-rea.go.kr/eng.policy.CountryPartnershipStrategy.do (accessed: June 10 2018).

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2006. “Successful Partner-ships: A Guide.” OECD LEED Forum on Partnerships and Local Governance pp. 1–36.

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2014. OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Japan 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2017. “Development Aid Rises Again in 2016.” OECD Summary Report pp. 1–9.

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2018 [1]. “Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action.” Online: http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/parisdeclara-tionandaccraagendaforaction.htm (accessed: July 15 2018).

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2018 [2]. “DAC Member Profile: Korea.” Online: http://www.oecd.org/dac/korea.htm (accessed: May 28 2018).

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2018 [3]. OECD Development Cooperation Peer Reviews: Korea 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2018 [4]. “DAC Members.” Online: http://www.oecd.org/dac/dacmembers.htm (accessed: May 5 2018).

  • Oxfam (Oxford Committee for Famine Relief). 2012. “Busan in a Nutshell: What next for the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation?” Oxfam Briefing Note pp. 1–14.

  • Park Kyung Ryul. 2017. “An Analysis of Aid Information Management Systems (AIMS) in Developing Countries: Explaining the Last Two Decades.” Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Paper pp. 2580–2589.

  • Piefer Nadine. 2014. “Triangular Cooperation: Bridging South-South and North-South Cooperation? Workshop on South-South Development Cooperation Paper pp. 1–31.

  • Poate Derek. 1997. “Measuring and Managing Results: Lessons for Development Cooperation/Performance Management.” SIDA Joint Evaluation pp. 1–97.

  • Roblero Morales Sindy. 2017. “Análisis de la Cooperación Internacional Coreana (KOICA) a partir del apoyo técnico económico a los programas de productividad y desarrollo en Guatemala.” M.A. thesis USAC Escuela de Ciencia Política Guatemala.

  • Rocha Menocal Alina and Leni Wild. 2012. “Where Can Japanese Official Development Assistance Add Value?” Project Briefing 71 pp. 1–4.

  • Rosero Moncayo Gabriella and Diego Zorilla. 2013. “Measuring the Effectiveness of Development Cooperation at the Local Level.” UNDP Report pp. 1–80.

  • SAIIA (South African Institute of International Affairs). 2015. “Developing a Conceptual Frame-work for South-South Cooperation.” SAIIA Working Document pp. 1–58.

  • SAIIA (South African Institute of International Affairs). 2017. “A Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for South-South Cooperation.” SAIIA Working Paper March pp. 1–28.

  • Sanahuja José. 2010. “Post-Liberal Regionalism: S-S Cooperation in Latin America and the Caribbean.” In Roy Rathin and Melissa Andrade eds. South-South Cooperation. The Same Old Game or a New Paradigm? New York: UNDP Poverty in Focus 20 pp. 17–19.

  • SEGEPLAN (Secretaría de Planificación y Programación de la Presidencia). 2018 [1]. “Fuentes bilaterales.” Online: http://www.segeplan.gob.gt/nportal/index.php/biblioteca-documental/tematica/publicaciones-cooperacion-internacional/category/105-fuentes-bilaterales (accessed: June 7 2018).

  • SEGIB (Secretaría General Iberoamericana). 2010. “Report on South-South Cooperation in Ibero-America.” SEGIB Studies 5 pp. 1–83.

  • Selbervik Hilde. 1999. “Aid and Conditionality: The Role of the Bilateral Donor: A Case Study of Norwegian-Tanzanian Aid Relationship.” Online: https://www.oecd.org/countries/tanza-nia/35178610.pdf (accessed: August 14 2018).

  • The Asia Foundation. 2012. “Emerging Asian Approaches to Development Cooperation.” Online: https://asiafoundation.org/resources/pdfs/EmergingAsianApproachestoDevelopmentCoopera-tionConferencePapers.pdf (accessed: August 16 2018).

  • The Diplomat. 2018. “South-Korea’s Role in East Asia-Latin America Cooperation.” Online: https://thediplomat.com/2016/10/south-koreas-role-in-east-asia-latin-america-cooperation/ (accessed: September 11 2018).

  • The World Bank. 2018. “The World Bank in Guatemala.” Online: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/guatemala/overview (accessed: May 24 2018).

  • Tortora Piera. 2011. “Common Ground between South-South and North-South Cooperation Principles.” OECD Development Co-operation Directorate Issue Brief pp. 1–4.

  • Uh Soo Bong and Roknuzzamn Siddiky. 2017. “Does Development Aid Work? Improving Aid Effectiveness in International Development Cooperation Efforts.” Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology 14 (2) pp. 120–142.

  • UN (United Nations). 2014. “South-South Development Cooperation.” UN Background Note pp. 1–4.

  • UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2014. “Transfer of Technology and Knowledge Sharing for Development: Science Technology and Innovation Issues for Developing Countries.” UNCTAD Report pp. 1–71.

  • UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2015. “Global Value Chains and South-South Trade. Economic Cooperation and Integration among Developing Countries.” UNCTAD Report pp. 1–56.

  • UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). 2018. “National Mutual Accountability and Transparency in Development Cooperation: Study on the Findings of the Fifth DCF Survey.” ECOSOC Development Cooperation Forum pp. 1–32.

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Program). 2009. “Handbook on Planning Monitoring and Evaluating for Development Results.” UNDP Handbook pp. 1–232.

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Program). 2015. “Guatemala Launches National Development Plan Mainstreaming Poverty-Environment.” Online: http://www.unpei.org/latest-news/guatemala-launches-national-development-plan-mainstreaming-poverty-environment (accessed: June 20 2018).

  • UNISDR (The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2013. “Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.” UNISDR Publication Geneva pp. 1–26.

  • Vaes Sarah. and Huib Huyse. 2013. “New Voices on South-South Cooperation between Emerging Powers and Africa: African Civil Society Perspectives.” KU Leuven Research Paper pp. 1–78.

  • Van de Looy Judith. 2006. “Africa and China: A Strategic Partnership?” ASC Working Paper 67 pp. 1–28.

  • Wallach Stefanie Gregory Gleed Emma Newbatt and Jessica Shearer. 2017. “IDSI Monitoring Evaluation and Learning Framework.” IDSI Post-Consultation Report pp. 1–69.

  • Watson David. 2006. “Monitoring and Evaluation of Capacity and Capacity Development.” ECDPM Discussion Paper 58B pp. 1–32.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 23 23 12
PDF Downloads 26 26 16