In July 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) issued its final award on the South China Sea dispute between the Philippines and China that caught the attention of the international community. Since this was the first time that a claimant in the South China Sea had ever referred the case to an international juridical body in an effort to settle the dispute, the responses of both claimant and non-claimant stakeholders were awaited. Realising the relevance of the issue, I conduct a comparative study of the responses to the PCA’s final award to two major claimants with similar positions on the South China Sea—the Philippines and Vietnam. The main aim of this study is to indicate the similarities and/or differences in the way these two states responded to the final decisions of the PCA. The study finds that even though both the Philippines and Vietnam reacted to the award in a similar manner, the motives behind their responses were different. In general, the South China Sea policy of the Philippines has always been less consistent than that of Vietnam, which can be explained through each state’s foreign policy tendencies.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
ABS-CBN News. 2016. “Rodrigo Duterte: Pagbabago or Bust.” Online: https://news.abscbn.com/focus/06/29/16/rodrigo-duterte-pagbabago-or-bust (accessed: July 10 2019).
Amer Ramses. 2014. “China Vietnam and the South China Sea: Disputes and Dispute Management.” Ocean Development and International Law 45 (1) pp. 17–40.
Askandar Kamarulzaman and Carlervin Sukim. 2016. “Making Peace over a Disputed Territory in Southeast Asia: Lessons from the Batu Puteh / Pedra Branca Case.” The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies 3 (1) pp. 65–85.
Bautista Lowell. 2016. “The Philippines and the Arbitral Tribunal’s Award: A Sombre Victory and Uncertain Times Ahead.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 38 (3) pp. 349–355.
Baviera Aileen S.P. 2014. “Domestic Interests and Foreign Policy in China and the Philippines: Implications for the South China Sea Disputes.” Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethno-graphic Viewpoints 62 (1) pp.133–143.
Baviera Aileen S.P. 2016. “The Philippines and the South China Sea Dispute: Security Interests and Perspectives”. In I. Storey and C.Y. Lin eds. The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute pp.161–185.
BBC. 2011. “Vietnam in Live-Fire Drill Amid South China Sea Row.” BBC June 13 2011; online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-13745587 (accessed: July 17 2019).
Branigan Tania. 2011. “Vietnam Holds Live-Fire Exercises as Territorial Dispute with China Escalates.” The Guardian June 14 2011; online: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jun/14/china-vietnam-dispute-military-exercise (accessed: July 17 2019).
Butcher John G. 2013. “The International Court of Justice and the Territorial Dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia in the Sulawesi Sea.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 35 (2) pp. 235–257.
Castro Renato Cruz De 2016. “The Duterte Administration’s Foreign Policy: Unravelling the Aquino Administration’s Balancing Agenda on an Emergent China.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 35 (3) pp.139–159.
Chen Shaofeng. 2018. “Regional Responses to China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative in Southeast Asia.” Journal of Contemporary China 27 (111) pp. 344–361.
CNBC. 2016. “Philippines Says Dropping South China Sea Ruling from ASEAN Statement No Win for China.” CNBC July 26 2016; online: https://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/26/philippines-says-dropping-south-china-sea-ruling-from-asean-statement-no-win-for-china.html (accessed: July 9 2019).
Esmaquel II Paterno. 2016. “Duterte: PH Won’t ‘Flaunt’ Sea Dispute Ruling vs China.” Rappler June 30 2016; online: https://www.rappler.com/nation/138195-duterte-flaunt-ruling-case-china-yasay-cabinet (accessed: July 9 2019).
Garrison Jean and Marc Wall. 2016. “The Rise of Hedging and Regionalism: An Explanation and Evaluation of President Obama’s China Policy.” Asian Affairs: An American Review 43 (2) pp. 47–63.
Guzman Charles Joseph De 2014. “Philippines-China Relations 2001-2008: Dovetailing National Interests.” Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia 50 (1) pp. 71–97.
Heydarian Richard Javad. 2017. “Tragedy of Small Power Politics: Duterte and the Shifting Sands of Philippine Foreign Policy.” Asian Security 13 (3) pp. 220–236.
Heydarian Richard Javad. 2018. “Mare Liberum: Aquino Duterte and The Philippines’ Evolving Lawfare Strategy in the South China Sea.” Asian Politics and Policy 10 (2) pp. 283–299.
Keck Zachary. 2014. “Vietnam Threatens Legal Action Against China.” The Diplomat June 2 2014; online: https://thediplomat.com/2014/06/vietnam-threatens-legal-action-against-china/ (accessed: July 23 2019).
Nguyen Manh Hung. 2017. “The Permanent Court of Arbitration’s Award on the South China Sea Dispute between the Philippines and China: Views from America.” In J. Borton ed. Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea: Post-Hague Ruling. Bloomington IN: Xlibris US pp. 116–128.
PCA. 2015. Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility. Online: https://www.pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/1506 (accessed: July 3 2019).
PCA. 2016. Award. Online: https://www.pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/2086 (accessed: July 5 2019).
Quintos Mary Fides A. 2018. “The Philippines: Hedging in a Post-Arbitration South China Sea?” Asian Politics and Policy 10 (2) pp. 261–282.
Reuters. 2016. Philippines’ Duterte Wants to ‘Open Alliances’ with Russia China. Online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-politics-duterte-idUSKCN11W17T (accessed: July 14 2019).
Shoji Tomotaka. 2016. “Vietnam’s Omnidirectional Military Diplomacy: Focusing on the South China Sea.” NIDS Journal of Defense and Security 17 pp. 41–61.
Shoji Tomotaka and Hideo Tomikawa. 2017. “Southeast Asia: Duterte Takes Office South China Sea in Flux.” In Shinji Hyodo ed. East Asian Strategic Review 2017. Tokyo: The Japan Times Ltd. pp. 131–155.
Southgate Laura and Nicholas Khoo. 2016. “Enter the Vanguard State: Reinterpreting ASEAN’s Response to the South China Sea Issue.” Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 3 (2) pp. 221–244.
Storey Ian. 2016a. “Rising Tensions in the South China Sea: Southeast Asian Responses.” In I. Storey and C.Y Lin eds. The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute; pp. 134–160.
Storey Ian. 2016b. “Assessing Responses to the Arbitral Tribunal’s Ruling on the South China Sea.” ISEAS Perspective 43. Singapore: Yusof Ishak Institute.
Thayer Carlyle A. 2011. “Chinese Assertiveness in the South China Sea and Southeast Asian Responses.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 30 (2) pp. 77–104.
Thayer Carlyle A. 2016. “Vietnam’s Strategy of ‘Cooperating and Struggling’ with China over Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea.” Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 3 (2) pp. 200–220.
Thayer Carlyle A. 2017a. “Dead in the Water: The South China Sea Arbitral Award One Year Later.” The Diplomat June 28 2017; online: https://thediplomat.com/2017/06/dead-in-the-water-the-south-china-sea-arbitral-award-one-year-later/ (accessed: August 4 2019).
Thayer Carlyle A. 2017b. Vietnam’s Foreign Policy in an Era of Rising Sino-US Competition and Increasing Domestic Political Influence. Asian Security 13 (3) pp. 183–199.
The Philippines Department of Foreign Affairs. 2016. “Statement of the Secretary of Foreign Affairs.” Online: https://www.dfa.gov.ph/documents-on-the-west-philippine-sea (accessed: July 6 2019).
Tran Truong Thuy. 2016. “Vietnam’s Relations with China and the US and the Role of ASEAN.” In Security Outlook of the Asia Pacific Countries and Its Implications for the Defense Sector. Tokyo: The National Institute for Defense Studies pp. 87–96.
Vietnam Embassy in Germany. 2014. “Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung Answers to Associated Press on 21 May.” Online: http://www.vietnambotschaft.org/prime-minister-nguyen-tan-dung-answers-to-associated-press-on-21-may/ (accessed: August 5 2019).
Vietnam MOFA. 2014. “Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of The Socialist Republic of Vietnam Transmitted to the Arbitral Tribunal in the Proceedings between The Republic of the Philippines and The People’s Republic of China.” Online: https://iuscogen.files.word-press.com/2018/03/statement-of-mofa-of-vietnam-to-the-tribunal.pdf (accessed: July 9 2019).
Vietnam MOFA. 2016. “Remarks of the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Viet Nam on Viet Nam’s Reaction to the Issuance of the Award by the Tribunal Constituted under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in the Arbitration between the Philippines and China.” Online: http://www.mofa.gov.vn/en/tt_baochi/pbnfn/ns160712211059 (accessed: July 9 2019).
Vnexpress. 2017. “Đội tàu ngầm Kilo [The Kilo Submarines].” Vnexpress August 3 2017; online: https://vnexpress.net/interactive/2017/suc-manh-6-tau-ngam-kilo-viet-nam (accessed: August 2 2019).
Vu Truong Minh and Thanh Trung Nguyen. 2017. “Vietnam’s Foreign Policy after the South China Sea Ruling.” Thinking ASEAN 20 pp. 8–13.
Yasay Perfecto R. 2016. “Come Let Us Reason Together: Remarks of the Hon. Perfecto R.Yasay Jr. Secretary of Foreign Affairs at the Second Manila Conference on the South China Sea.” Online: https://www.dfa.gov.ph/speeches-and-statements/10079-come-let-us-reason-together (accessed: July 11 2019).
Zha Daojiong and Mark J. Valencia. 2001. “Mischief Reef: Geopolitics and Implications.” Journal of Contemporary Asia31 (1) pp. 86–103.
Zha Wen. 2015. “Personalized Foreign Policy Decision-Making and Economic Dependence: A Comparative Study of Thailand and the Philippines’ China Policies.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 37 (2) pp. 242–268.
Zhang Feng. 2017. “Assessing China’s Response to the South China Sea Arbitration Ruling.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 71 (4) pp. 440–459.
Zunes Stephen. 2004. “Implications of the U.S. Reaction to the World Court Ruling against Israel’s ‘Separation Barrier.’” Middle East Policy IX (4) pp. 72–85.