Simulation modelling tools have been widely adopted for the evaluation of alternatives in transport planning, management and logistics. The complexity that underlies in transport systems and logistics necessitate the integration of different models that are capable of overcoming limitations that may exist individually to each model. Towards this direction, this paper aims to integrate two simulation software and use the integrated model for the evaluation of traffic and logistics measures in the wider area of Volos Port, Greece. The built model is able to simulate the traffic conditions on a transport network along with port’s intra-logistics processes and is used to evaluate a set of measures in the year 2030, by comparing it with the situation in the year 2030 without having implemented any new measure. For the evaluation, a set of indicators is used to gauge the environmental and transport impacts. The analysis is completed by using a multi-criteria decision making tool to generate the Logistics Sustainability Index (LSI) to summarize the information that is provided by the indicators. The results show that the use of integrated simulation models can provide a holistic impact evaluation of complex decisions with a high level of accuracy.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Borge, R., Lumbreras, J., Pérez, J., de la Paz, D., Vedrenne, M., de Andrés, J., Rodríguez, M. (2014) Emission inventories and modelling requirements for the development of air quality plans. Application to Madrid (Spain). Science of the Total Environment. 466-467, 809-819 (2014).
2. Cimpeanu, R., Devine, M.T., O’Brien, C. (2017) A simulation model for the management and expansion of extended port terminal operations. In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 98, pp. 105–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.12.005.
4. Dragović, B., Tzannatos, E., Park, N.K. (2017) Simulation modelling in ports and container terminals. Literature overview and analysis by research field, application area and tool. In: Flex Serv Manuf J 29 (1), pp. 4–34. DOI: 10.1007/s10696-016-9239-5.
5. Eldabi, T., Balaban, M., Brailsford, S., Mustafee, N., Nance, R., Onggo, B. S., Sargent, R. G. (2016) HYBRID Simulation: Historical Lessons, Present Challenges and Futures. In: Theresa M. Roeder, Peter I. Frazier, Robert Szechtman, Enlu Zhou (Eds.): Simulating complex service systems. WSC’16 - Winter Simulation Conference: Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, VA, December 11-14, 2016. [Piscataway, NJ], [Piscataway, NJ]: IEEE, pp. 1388–1403.
6. Fakhimi, M., Mustafee, N., Stergioulas, L., Eldabi, T. (2013) A Review of Literature in Modeling Approaches for Sustainable Development. In: R. Pasupathy, S.-H. Kim, A. Tolk, R. Hill, and M. E. Kuhl (Ed.): Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference: IEEE, pp. 282–290.
7. Fellendorf, M. and Vortisch, P., (2010) Microscopic Traffic Flow Simulator VISSIM. In: Jaume Barceló (Ed.): Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation, vol. 145. New York, NY: Springer New York (International series in operations research & management science), pp. 63–93.
10. Hofmann, W., Assmann, T., Dolati N., Parisa; C., Van-Dat; Tolujevs, J. (2017) A Simulation Tool to Assess the Integration of Cargo Bikes into an Urban Distribution System. In Bruzzone, Janosy, Nicoletti, Zacharewicz (Eds.): Proceedings of the International Workshop on Simulation for Energy, Sustainable Development & Environment, 2017, pp. 11–20.
11. Hou, L. and Geerlings, H. (2016) Dynamics in sustainable port and hinterland operations. A conceptual framework and simulation of sustainability measures and their effectiveness, based on an application to the Port of Shanghai. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 135, pp. 449–456. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.134.
12. Jain, A., Liu, M., Fujimoto, R., Crittenden, J., Kim, J., Lu, Z. (2015) Towards Automating the Development of Federated Distributed Simulations for Modelling Sustainable Urban Infrastructures. In: Levent Yilmaz (Ed.): Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference, December 6-9, 2015, Huntington Beach, CA. Piscataway, NJ, [Madison, Wis.]: IEEE; Omnipress.
13. Karakikes, I., Mitropoulos L., Savrasovs, M. (2018) Evaluating Smart Urban Freight Solutions Using Microsimulation, Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, DOI 10.1007/978- 3-319-74454-4_53
14. Karakikes, I., Spangler, M., Margreiter, M. (2016) Motorway Simulation Using Bluetooth Data, Transport and Telecommunication Journal, Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 242–251. DOI: 10.1515/ttj- 2016-0022 (2016).
15. Lin, J., Gao, B., Zhang, C. (2014) Simulation-based investment planning for Humen Port. In: Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 40, pp. 161–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2013.09.009.
16. Linton, C., Grant-Muller, S., Gale, W. (2015) Approaches and Techniques for Modelling CO2Emissions from Road Transport. Transport Reviews. 35, 533-553 (2015).
17. Mittal, A. and Krejci, C. (2015) A Hybrid Simulation Model of Inbound Logistics Operations in Regional Food Supply Systems. In: Levent Yilmaz (Ed.): Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference, December 6-9, 2015, Huntington Beach, CA. Piscataway, NJ, [Madison, Wis.]: IEEE; Omnipress, pp. 1549–1560.
18. Nathanail, E., Gogas, M. and Adamos, G. (2016) Smart interconnections and urban freight transport towards achieving sustainable city logistics. Transportation Research Procedia 14 (2016) 983-992, Elsevier. 6th Transport Research Arena, Warsaw, Poland, April 18-21, (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.078.
20. Quaassdorff, C., Borge, R., Pérez, J., Lumbreras, J., de la Paz, D., de Andrés, J. (2016) Microscale traffic simulation and emission estimation in a heavily trafficked roundabout in Madrid (Spain). Science of the Total Environment. 566-567, 416-427 (2016).
21. Schipper, C.A.; Vreugdenhil, H.; Jong, M.P.C. de (2017) A sustainability assessment of ports and port-city plans. Comparing ambitions with achievements. In: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 57, pp. 84–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.08.017.