This paper introduces a multi-stakeholder multi-criteria evaluation framework, which can be used for the assessment of the last mile distribution performance of urban freight terminals. To this end, a comparative analysis is conducted addressing two Greek urban intermodal freight terminals located at the port of Thessaloniki (ThPA) and Kuehne+Nagel (K+N)’s premises. The assessment of the terminals’ performance relies on a tailored multi-criteria Key Performance Indicator (KPI)-based evaluation framework, whereas the selection and significance of the incorporated criteria and KPIs is predetermined by the relevant responsible stakeholders, who imposed their viewpoint through an analytic hierarchy process. Results showed that ThPA was ranked first according to its performance pertaining to the role of an intermodal interchange; still, K+N’s performance index was only 8.5% lower than ThPA’s, while in specific KPIs it seems that it performs in a better way.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Andersen J., Eidhammer O., Osland, O., Parra L. and Adamos, G. (2010) Interconnections between short and long-distance transport networks: Structure of interface and existing indicators. Deliverable 3.1. CLOSER - Connecting LOng and Short-distance networks for Efficient tRansport.
2. Andersen, J., Eidhammer, O., Gogas, M., Papoutsis, K. and Nathanail, E. (2014) Demonstration assessments. Deliverable 5.1. STRAIGHTSOL - STRAtegies and measures for smarter urban freiGHT SOLutions.
3. Chen, M.K. and Wang, S. (2010) The critical factors of success for information service industry in developing international market: Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, 2010, pp. 694-704.
4. Christiansen, P., Johansen, B.G., Andersen, J. and Eidhammer, O. (2012) Case studies: Results and synthesis. Deliverable 5.2. CLOSER - Connecting LOng and Short-distance networks for Efficient tRansport.
5. European Center for Government Transformation, (2015) Boosting innovation in cities to deliver better public services - A view from tomorrow’s leaders. College of Europe student case studies, Final report.
6. European Commission (2014) Living well, within the limits of our planet. 7th EAP - The New General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020.
7. Gogas, M. and Nathanail, E. (2014) Multilevel multicriteria design of intermodal transport Freight Center networks. International Conference on Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization (OPTi 2014), Kos Island, Greece.
8. Järvi, T. and Nagel, I. (2013) Guidance and recommendations for interconnection between long distance and local/regional passenger transport. Deliverable 6.1. CLOSER - Connecting LOng and Short-distance networks for Efficient tRansport.
9. Li, S. and Li, J.Z. (2009) Hybridising human judgment, AHP, simulation and a fuzzy expert system for strategy formulation under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36 2009, 5557-5564.
10. Nathanail, E. and Gogas, M. (2005) Spatial planning - Development of nodal points and terminals. Deliverable 4. IMONODE - Efficient Integration of cargo transport MOdes and NODEs in CADSES area.
11. Nathanail, E. (2007) Developing an integrated logistics terminal network in the CADSES area.Transition Studies Review, May 2007, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 125-146.
12. Nathanail, E.G., Gogas, M.A. and Papoutsis, K.N. (2014) Investigation of Stakeholders’ View towards the introduction of ICT in Supply Chain using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Traffic and Logistics Engineering, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 113-119.
13. Perez, D.H. (2013) Supply Chain Roadmap: aligning supply chain with business strategy. ISBN 978-1494200497.
14. Rodrigue, J.P., Comtois, C. and Slack, B. (2009) The "Last Mile" in Freight Distribution. The Geography of Transport Systems (2nd ed.), Routledge. p. 212. ISBN 978-0-415-48323-0.
15. Saaty, T. (1972) An eigenvalue allocation model for prioritization and planning. In working paper Energy Management and Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, 1972.
16. Saaty, T. (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15 1977, pp. 234-281.
17. Scott, M. (2009) Improving Freight Movement in Delaware Central Business Districts. Institute for Public Administration, University of Delaware.
18. Taniguchi, E., Thompson, R.G. and Yamada, T. (1999) Modeling city logistics. In: City Logistics I (E. Taniguchi and R.G. Thompson, eds.), Institute of Systems Science Research, Kyoto, pp. 3-37.
19. Woudsma, C., Jensen, J., Karoglou, P. and Maoh, H. (2007) Logistics land use and the city: A spatialtemporal modeling approach. Transportation Research Part E, 44, 277-297.
20. Zahir, S. (1999) Clusters in group: Decision making in the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 112: 620-634.