North European Export Industry and the Shadows of Sulphur Directive

Open access


EU Directive of MARPOL Annex VI and its economic impact on the Nordic paper industry is theme of this research work. Empirical data for analysis purposes was gained from a large Nordic paper mill that exports bulk products mainly to Europe (70 % of its volume). The study shows that in the end the industry’s location still has an economical effect, and that the location has a distinct impact on competition through rising transportation costs. Environmental regulation continues and fosters long-term upwards trajectory of transportation cost, which has been experienced by the paper mill earlier during years 2001-2009. Sulphur regulation change to cleaner grades of maritime diesel did not turn as heavy cost increase in the 2015, however, possibility to gain cost benefits in rapidly deteriorating oil markets were not reached either. Therefore, in depressed industrial product markets, like paper industry, implications were such that margins of export industry remained low.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Alhosalo M. (2013) Shipowners Barometer. Publications from the Centre for Maritime Studies University of Turku B 197 Turku Finland.

  • 2. Anonymous (2014) Interviews of logistics management of two large paper companies.

  • 3. Arlbjørn J.S. Jonsson P. and Johansen J. (2008) Nordic research in logistics and supply chain management: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 6: 452–474.

  • 4. Bruckner-Menchelli N. (2009) Scrubbers versus Distillates. Sustainable shipping p. 24.

  • 5. Bruckner-Menchelli N. (2011) US Navy Targets 2016 for Green Fuel use. Sustainable Shipping. Petromedia Ltd. URL:

  • 6. Bunkerworld (2015) Bunker prices. Rotterdam URL:

  • 7. Cullinane K. (2012) Chapter 4 An International Dimension: Shipping. In: Tim Ryley Lee Chapman (eds.) Transport and Climate Change (Transport and Sustainability). Vol. 2 pp. 65-104.

  • 8. CME Group (2014) Crude Oil Futures Quotes URL:

  • 9. Diesen M. (1998) Economics of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Gummerus Oy Jyväskylä.

  • 10. Dieter M. and Englert H. (2007) Competitiveness in the global forest industry sector: an empirical study with special emphasis on Germany. European Journal of Forest Research Vol. 126 pp. 401-412.

  • 11. Einemo U. (2013) Methanol Sea Trial Expected to Start this Month. Sustainable Shipping. Petromedia Ltd. <>.

  • 12. Entec (2010) Study to Review Assessments Undertaken of the Revised MARPOL Annex VI Regulations Commissioned by the Shipowners’ Associations of Belgium Finland Germany Holland Sweden and the UK London.

  • 13. European Shortsea Network (2014) ESN – Way Forward SECA report.

  • 14. EU (2005) DIRECTIVE 2005/33/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 6 July 2005 amending Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels. Brussels Belgium.

  • 15. EU (2012) DIRECTIVE 2012/33/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 21 November 2012 amending Council Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels Brussels Belgium.

  • 16. FOEX (2015) Latest PIX index values with comments URL: (accessed 28.February.2015).

  • 17. Forestindustries (2013) The Finnish Forest Industry in Figures. URL:

  • 18. Forslid R. Haaland J. Midelfart I. and Knarvik K. H. (2002) A U-Shaped Europe? A simulation study of industrial location. Journal of International Economics Vol. 57 pp. 273-297.

  • 19. Gallagher T.L. (2010) Maersk to run biodiesel test. Journal of Commerce Online. Journal of Commerce New York. URL:

  • 20. Head K. and Mayer T. (2004) The empirics of agglomeration and trade. In: Henderson V. Thisse J.-F. (eds.): Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics vol. 4. North Holland Amsterdam.

  • 21. Hilmola O.-P. (2013) Environmental and infrastructure payments and the future of road transports: case Tallinn-Warsaw. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 4:1 pp. 55-72.

  • 22. Hilmola Olli-Pekka (2014) Growth drivers of Finnish-Estonian general cargo transports. Fennia – International Journal of Geography 192:2 pp. 100-119.

  • 23. Hilmola Olli-Pekka (2015) Shipping sulphur regulation freight transportation prices and diesel markets in the Baltic Sea Region. International Journal of Energy Sector Management 9:1 pp. 120-132.

  • 24. Hjelle H.M. (2010) Short sea shipping’s green label at risk. Transport Reviews 30:5 pp. 617-640.

  • 25. Hjelle H.M. Fridell E. (2010) When is short sea shipping environmentally competitive? International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Conference Lisbon 7–9 July 1–18.

  • 26. Holmgren J. Nikopoulou Z. Ramstedt L. Woxenius J. (2014) Modelling modal choice effects of regulation on low-sulphur marine fuels in Northern Europe. Transportation Research Part D 28 pp. 62-73

  • 27. Hämäläinen E. (2011a) Cost efficiency of supply chain in a Nordic paper mill – A case study. International Journal of Management 28:3 pp. 945–958.

  • 28. Hämäläinen E. (2011b) Economic geographical analysis of the Finnish paper industry. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis SER A11 – TOM 263. Turku Finland.

  • 29. Hämäläinen E. (2011c) Economic geographic characteristics in the Finnish paper industry − a case study. Fennia – International Journal of Geography 189:2 pp. 63-75.

  • 30. Hämäläinen E. and Tapaninen U. (2008) Spatial characteristics of the transports in the paper mill’s supply chain. Fennia – International Journal of Geography 186:2 pp. 83–93.

  • 31. Hämäläinen E. and Tapaninen U. (2010) Economics of a Nordic paper mill – case study. Industrial management and Data Systems 110:1 pp. 5-23.

  • 32. Hämäläinen E. and Tapaninen U. (2011) Accuracy of forecasting in a Nordic paper mill’s supply chain: A case study. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 65:2 pp. 104–113.

  • 33. Hämäläinen Esa Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Lauri Hetemäki (2015) Fluctuating demand and its impacts to a paper producer: customer analysis. Expert Systems with Applications (forthcoming).

  • 34. IMO (2014) International Maritime Organization Sulphur oxides (SOx) – Regulation 14 URL:–-Regulation-14.aspx

  • 35. ISL (2010) Reducing the sulphur content of shipping fuels further to 0.1% in the North Sea and Baltic Sea in 2015: Consequencs for Shipping in this Area Commissioned by the German Shipowners’ Association and Association of German Seaport Operators. Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics Bremen.

  • 36. Jiang L. Kronbak J. and Christensen L. P. (2014) The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil. Transportation Research Part D Vol. 28 pp. 19–27.

  • 37. Kalli J. (2012) Päivitys: Laivapolttoaineiden rikkipitoisuus vuonna 2015 Selvitys IMO:n uusien määräysten vaikutuksesta kuljetuskustannuksiin. Turun yliopisto Merenkulkualan koulutus ja tutkimuskeskus.

  • 38. Kalli J. Tapio K. and Teemu M. (2009) Sulphur content in ships bunker fuel in 2015: a study on the impacts of the new IMO regulations and transportation costs. Ministry of Transport and Communications No. 31 Helsinki Finland.

  • 39. Koskinen P. (2009) Supply chain strategy in a global paper manufacturing company: a case study. Industrial Management and Data Systems 109:1 pp. 34-52.

  • 40. Koskinen P. Hilmola O-P. (2008) Supply chain challenges of North-European paper industry. Industrial Management and Data Systems 108:2 pp. 208-227.

  • 41. Krugman P. (1995) Development Geography and Economic Theory Returns and Economic Geography The MIT Press Boston.

  • 42. Lähtinen K. (2007) Linking resource-based view with business economics of woodworking industry: earlier findings and future insights. Silva Fennica 41:1 pp. 149-165.

  • 43. Nordea (2013) New forecasts: Oil prices creep higher URL:

  • 44. Notteboom T. (2011) The impact of low sulphur fuel requirements in shipping on the competitiveness of roro shipping in Northern Europe. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 10:1 pp. 63-95.

  • 45. Notteboom T. Delhaye E. and Vanherle K. (2010) Analysis of the Consequences of Low Sulphur Fuel Requirements. Report commissioned by European Community Shipowners’ Associations (ECSA).

  • 46. RISI (2015) Resource Information Systems Inc. Database for Pulp and Paper available at URL: (accessed 28.February.2015).

  • 47. Swedish Forest Industries Federation (2009) Information Paper – Consequences for the Pulp and Paper Industry due to New Sulphur Regulations for Ships 18 June 2009.

  • 48. The Finnish Transport Safety Agency (2013) Merenkulun uusien ympäristömääräysten aiheuttamien kustannusten kartoittaminen Liikenteen turvallisuusvirasto (Finnish Transport Safety Agency) julkaisuja 24/2013.

  • 49. Weber A. (1909) Über den Standort der Industrien. Tübingen. English translation by Freidrich C.J. 1929. Alfred Weber’s Theory of Location of Industries. University of Chicago Press.

Journal information
Impact Factor

Cite Score 2018: 1.19

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.251
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.982

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 303 159 3
PDF Downloads 125 75 3