A Green Corridor Balanced Scorecard

  • 1 School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, Akadeemia tee 3-370, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia, Phone: + 372 620 3971


Green transport corridors represent trans-shipment routes with a concentration of freight traffic between major hubs and long distances of transport marked by reduced environmental and climate impact. Important characteristics of green corridors are their network structures, their transnational character and their high involvement of public and private stakeholders, including political level requiring new governance models. Network-oriented controlling of green transport corridors require new concepts and instruments concentrating on multi-dimensional evaluation of collective strategies and processes in an international environment with a focus on cross-company aspects.

Until now the scientific discussion focusses on different sets of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for monitoring and management of green corridors, which mainly cover sustainable aspects of green corridor development by neglecting a network-oriented controlling approach so that a general concept for green corridor controlling is still missing. The current KPI approaches emphasize the operational aspects of the corridor performance so that a strategic management control system is needed to safeguard an efficient, innovative, safe and environmental friendly long-term development.

The paper will present and discuss a management control system for green supply chains based on the balanced scorecard concept and link the ongoing scientific discussion to recent research results about green corridor management. The presented green corridor balanced scorecard tries to solve the strategic weakness of the existing green corridor controlling approaches by integrating cooperative and network-oriented concepts from supply chain management.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Ackermann, I. (2003). Using the balanced scorecard for supply chain management - Prerequisites, integration issues, and performance measures. In: Seuring, S.; Müller, M.; Goldbach, M.; Schneidewind, U. (Hrsg.): Strategy and organization in supply chains. Heidelberg and New York, 289-304

  • 2. Coronel, S. (2012). Measuring Openness: A survey of transparency ratings and the prospects for a global index, 30.10.2012, http://www.freedominfo.org/2012/10/, accessed: 13.07.2014

  • 3. Daduna, J.; Hunke, K.; Prause, G. (2012). Analysis of Short Sea Shipping-Based Logistics Corridors in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering, 2(5, Serial Number 8), 304 - 319.

  • 4. DeLangen, P. W. (2004). The Performance of Seaport Clusters. TRAIL Thesis Series, No. T2004/1. ISBN 90-5892-056-9.

  • 5. Evangelista, P. (2002) The role of ICT in the logistics integration process of shipping lines. Pomorski zbornik 40.1 (2002): 61-78.

  • 6. EWTC II Green Corridor Manual. (2012). Green Corridor Manual - Task 3B of the EWTC II project.

  • 7. Göpfert, I. (2013). Logistik, Verlag Franz Vahlen, 3rd Edition, München

  • 8. Green Corridor (2010). Regeringskansliet - Government Offices of Sweden. Green Corridors. 15.06.2010

  • 9. Hess, T. (2002). Netzwerkcontrolling: Instrumente und ihre Werkzeugunterstützung. Wiesbaden

  • 10. Hippe, A. (1997). Interdependenzen von Strategie und Controlling in Unternehmensnetzwerken, Wiesbaden

  • 11. Hunke, K.; Prause, G. (2013). Management of Green Corridor Performance. Transport and Telecommunication, 14(4), 292 - 299.

  • 12. Hunke, K.; Prause, G. (2014). Sustainable supply chain management in German automotive industry: experiences and success factors. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 3(3), 15 - 22.

  • 13. Info Broker (2012). A key to efficient performance with as small ecological footprint as possible. EWTC II, Net. Port Karlshamn

  • 14. Kaplan, R.; Norton, D. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard. Translating Strategy into Action, Boston.

  • 15. Kersten, W., Boeger, M.; Schroeder, M.; Singer, C. (2007). Developing Regions through Spatial Planning and Logistics & ICT competence - final report. As part of the publication series of the EU project LogOn Baltic, Turku School of Economics, report no. 1:2007, Turku.

  • 16. Kron, E.; Prause, G. (2008). LogOn Baltic aggregated ICT Survey Report, Turku School of Economics, Turku 2008

  • 17. Kusch, T.; Prause, G.; Hunke, K. (2011). The East-West Transport Corridor and the Shuttle Train “VIKING”. Wismar: Wismar University

  • 18. Lange, C.; Schaefer, S.; Daldrup, H. (2001). Integriertes Controlling in strategischen Unternehmensnetzwerken, Controlling 13(2), 75-83.

  • 19. Lee, P.D. (2005). Measuring Supply Chain Integration: A Social Network Approach. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal 6(2), 58-67.

  • 20. Prause, G. (2010). SME in Service Cluster - A regional Study. In: Kramer, J.; Prause, G.; Sepp, J. (Eds.) Baltic Business and Socio-Economic Development 2007: 3rd International Conference Tallinn, Estonia, June 17-19, 2007 (349 - 360). Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag

  • 21. Prause, G. (2014a). CONTROLLINGING CONCEPTS FOR GREEN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference “Reliability and Statistics in Transport and Communication”. Riga, 15.-18. October 2014, forthcoming

  • 22. Prause, G. (2014b). Sustainable Development of Logistics Clusters in Green Transport Corridors, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 4(4), forthcoming

  • 23. Prause, G.; Hunke, K. (2014a). Sustainable Entrepreneurship along green corridors. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 1(3), 124 - 133.

  • 24. Prause, G.; Hunke, K. (2014b). Secure and Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Integrated ICT-Systems for Green Transport Corridors. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 3(4), 5 - 16.

  • 25. Prause, G.; Kron, E.; Beifert, A. (2010). Final ICT Report of the project “Innovation Network - Logistics Cluster Wismar Seaport”, Wismar 2010

  • 26. Sander, N.; Premus, R. (2002). IT applications in Supply Chain Organisations: a link between competitive priorities and organisational benefits, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 23, No. 1, 65-83.

  • 27. Sarkis, J. (2001). Introduction. Greener Management International 35(3), 21-25.

  • 28. Schnackenberg, A. (2009). Measuring Transparency: Towards a greater Understanding of systematic Transparence and Accountability, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University

  • 29. Schnackenberg, A.; Tomlinson, E., (2014). Organizational Transparency: A New Perspective on Managing Trust in Organization-Stakeholder Relationships. Journal of Management DOI: 10.1177/0149206314525202

  • 30. Seuring, S. (2006). Supply Chain Controlling: summarizing recent developments in German literature, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 11(1), 10 - 14.

  • 31. Seuring, S.; Müller, M. (2008). From literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain managmement, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 16, 1699 - 1710.

  • 32. Sydow, J.; Möllering, G. (2009). Produktion in Netzwerken, Verlag Franz Vahlen, 2nd edition, München


Journal + Issues