This paper presents an inquiry into the cognitive-pragmatic specifics of To Room Nineteen by Doris Lessing. Its major goal is to investigate the cognitive means that enable the fulfilment of the writer’s pragmatic aims in the process of literary communication. The research reveals the writer’s aims of raising the problem of women in a patriarchal society and of intensifying manipulative influence upon the reader, which were achieved via the implicit concept of NEUROSIS and the CONTAINER concept used to metaphorically interpret the described events. The investigation proved that the concept of NEUROSIS intensifies psychological manipulation of the reader, ensuring the reader’s engagement in message creation, preserving the reader’s trust regardless of the transference of inaccurate information, etc. It participates in the reader’s neural simulation through nomination of somatisms, retrieval of memories from previous painful experiences, the activation of the “mirroring” phenomenon, etc. Metaphoric modelling provides a psychological manipulation of the reader’s perception through shading and highlighting of the appropriate facets, creating proper associations and establishing specific images. It implements activation of the neural activity, creating imaginative simulation of the reader’s body in action and involving personal cognitive experiences.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Bara, B. G., Tirassa, M., 2000. Neuropragmatics: brain and communication. Brain and Language, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 10-14.
Bara, B. G., 2010. Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication (translated by John Douthwaite). Cambridge: A Bradford Book.
Bortolussi, M., Dixon, P., 1996. Literary communication: Effects of reader-narrator cooperation. Poetics, vol. 23, pp. 405-430.
Bystrov, Y., 2014. Fractal metaphor LIFE IS A STORY in biographical narrative. Topics in Linguistics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-8.
Bystrov, Y., 2011. Modelling authorial conceptual scheme: linguosynergetic aspect (based on the material of English). The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Romance and Germanic Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching, vol. 68, no. 973, pp. 130-135.
Chantal, B., Tracey, I., and Holmes, E. A., 2012. How a better understanding of spontaneous mental imagery linked to pain could enhance imagery-based therapy in chronic pain. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology (JEP), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 258-273.
Engel, A. K., Maye, A., Kurthen, M., and Konig, P., 2013. Where’s the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1-8.
Gallese, V., Lakoff, G., 2005. The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 455-479.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Matlock, T., 2008. Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In: R. W. Gibbs, Jr., ed. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 161-176.
Grisot, C., 2017. A quantitative approach to conceptual, procedural and pragmatic meaning: Evidence from inter-annotator agreement. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 117, pp. 245-263.
Hua Yu, Guo Jian, 2015. A stylistic analysis of To room nineteen. Linguistics and Literature Studies, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 88-90.
Klinger, E., 1978. The flow of thought and its implications for literary communication. Poetics, vol. 7, pp. 191-205.
Saussure, L. de, 2005. Manipulation and cognitive pragmatics: Preliminary hypotheses. Manipulation and ideologies in the twentieth century: Discourse, language, mind. In: L. de Saussure and P. Schulz, eds. Discourse Approaches to Politics. Society and Culture 17. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 113-146.
Schmid, H.-J., 2012. Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable. Basic ingredients of cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context. In: H.-J. Schmid, ed. Cognitive Pragmatics. Series: Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. 4. De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 3-22.
Semino, E., 2010. Descriptions of pain, metaphor and embodied simulation. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 205-226.
Verschueren, J., 2015. Pragmatics, Linguistic. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), vol. 18. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 795-802.
Weber, J. J., 1995. How metaphor leads Susan Rawlings into suicide: A cognitive-linguistic analysis of Doris Lessing’s ‘To Room Nineteen’. In: P. Verdonk and J. J. Weber, eds. Twentieth century fiction: From text to context. New York: Routledge, pp. 32-44.
Zhao, K., 2012. An analysis of three images in Doris Lessing’s To Room Nineteen. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1651-1655.