Morphological taxonomy in the present-day generative framework: A case study of English and Czech nominalization

Open access


This paper addresses the classification of morphemes in a generative framework. Referring to existing theoretical models of generative morphosyntax (e.g. Distributed Morphology), it demonstrates that a traditional long-standing taxonomic distinction reflects formal, i.e. structural (and derivational) distinctions. Using the well-known examples of the English multi-functional nominalizer -ing and some parallel data in Czech, the study reinterprets morphological taxonomy in terms of three levels, namely the (i) lexical, (ii) syntactic and (iii) post-syntactic insertion of grammatical formatives. It shows that the level of insertion in a syntactic derivation results in predictable (and attested) diagnostics for the multi-morpheme exponents.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abney S. P. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Ph.D. dissertation MIT Cambridge Mass.

  • Alexiadou A. 2001. Functional structure in nominals: Nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

  • Allen M. R. 1978. Morphological investigations. Ph.D. dissertation University of Connecticut.

  • Baker M. C. 1985. The Mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry vol. 16 no. 3 pp. 373-415.

  • Barker Ch. 2016. Why relational nominals make good concealed questions. Lingua SI: Understanding Possession vol. 182 pp. 12-29.

  • Bobaljik J. D. 1995. Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Ph.D. dissertation M.I.T.

  • Borer H. 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Studies in Generative Grammar 13. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Borer H. 2005-2013. Structuring sense: Volume I-III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Chomsky N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.

  • Chomsky N. 1970. Remarks on nominalizations. In: Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton pp. 11-61.

  • Chomsky N. 1995. The minimalist program. The MIT Press Cambridge Mass.

  • Chomsky N. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130 pp. 33-49.

  • Dubinsky S. and R. Simango 1996. Passive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for modular distinctions in grammar. Language 72 pp. 749-781.

  • Emonds J. E. 1987. The invisible category principle. Linguistic Inquiry vol. 18 pp. 613-632.

  • Emonds J. E. 1991. The autonomy of the (syntactic) lexicon and syntax: Insertion conditions for derivational and inflectional morphemes. In: C. Georgopoulos and R. Ishihara eds. Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S. Y. Kuroda. Amsterdam: Kluwer pp. 119-148.

  • Emonds J. E. 2000. Lexicon & grammar: The English syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Emonds J. E. 2018. The dual nature of derivational morphology: English agentive –er. Anglophone Conference 2018 at Univerzity Hradec Králové March 22-23 2018. Proceedings forthcoming.

  • Grimshaw J. 1991. Argument structure. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Halle M. and Marantz A. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: K. Hale and S.J. Keyser eds. The view from building 20. Cambridge MA: MIT Press pp. 111-176.

  • Harley H. 2007. Distributed morphology. Lecture Notes. Ms. University of Arizona. [Accessed 2 September 2018]. Available at:

  • Harley H. and Noyer R. 2000. Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalizations. In: B. Peters ed. The lexicon-encyclopedia interface. Oxford: Elsevier Press pp. 349-374.

  • Hazout I. 1995. Action nominalizations and the lexicalist hypothesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory vol.13 no.3 pp. 355-404.

  • Karlík P. 2000. Valence substantiv v modifikované valenční teorii. In: Čeština: univerzália a specifika. Sborník konference ve Šlapanicích u Brna 17.-19.11.1999 pp. 181-192.

  • Karlík P. and Nübler N.1998. Poznámky k nominalizaci v češtině. Slovo a slovesnost vol. 59 no.2 pp. 105-112.

  • Lawrence R. W. 2017. Nominalization specification and investigation. PhD diss. Universiy of California Berkeley.

  • Lees R. 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. International Journal of Americal Linguistics vol. 26 no. 3. Reprint in Indiana University Research Center Bloomington.

  • Lieber R. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

  • Lieber R. 2016. English nouns: The ecology of nominalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

  • Marantz A. 2007. Phases and words. In: S.H. Choe ed. Phases in the theory of grammar. Seoul: Dong- In Publishing pp. 191-222.

  • Rozwadowska B. 2018. What psych nominals can tell us about the event structure of psych verbs. The paper presented in Olomouc Linguistic Colloquium June 2018. To appear in Proceedings.

  • Sapir E. 1923. The Algonkin affinity of Yurok and Wiyot kinship terms. Journal de la Société des Américanistes de Paris vol.15 pp. 37-74.

  • Sichel I. 2010. Event strucure constraints in nominalizations. In: A. Alexiadou and M. Rathers eds. The syntax of nominalizations across languages and frameworks. Berlin: Mouton pp. 151-190.

  • Siegel D. 1979. Topics in English morphology. New York: Garland.

  • Snyder W. 1998. On the aspectual properties of English derived nominals. In: O. Sauerland and O. Percus eds. The interpretive tract: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25 pp. 125-139.

  • Veselovská L. 2001. K analýze českých deverbálních substantiv. Čeština: Univerzália a specifika 3 pp. 11–28.

  • Veselovská L. 1998. Possessive movement in the Czech nominal phrase. Journal of Slavic Linguistics vol. 6 no. 2 pp. 255–300.

  • Veselovská L. 2018. Noun phrases in Czech: Their structure and agreements. Berlin: Peter Lang forthcoming.

  • Veselovská L. and Emonds J. 2016. Morphology divided and conquered. Linguistica Brunensia vol. 64 no. 1 pp. 143-162.

  • Veselovská L. and Karlík P. 2004. Analytic passives in Czech. Zeitschrift für Slawistik vol. 49 no. 2 pp. 163–235.

  • Wasow T. A. 1977. Transformations and the lexicon. In: P. Culicover T. Wasow and J. Bresnan eds. Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press pp. 327-360.

  • Williams E. 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word.’ Linguistic Inquiry vol. 12 pp. 245-274.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.447

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 249 152 12
PDF Downloads 193 113 13