NPI licensing in Jordanian Arabic: An argument for downward entailment and syntax-semantics interface

Open access


Recent work shows that downward entailment (DE) cannot be the right semantic domain that licenses negative polarity items (NPIs). Zwarts (1995), Giannakidou (1998), among others, argue that NPIs are licensed in non-veridical domains, those that do not entail or presuppose the truth of the propositions they embed. In this paper, based on empirical facts, I argue that DE theory is the right analysis for Jordanian Arabic. I propose an analysis of NPI licensing in which three components of grammar interface: syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Semantics defines the class of NPI licensors, pragmatics forces quantificational closure of NPIs, and syntax executes the licensing via AGREE between a phasal head and the NPI. The analysis contributes to the debate on what components of grammar are responsible for NPI licensing and provides a new perspective on the interface between different components of grammar.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ALSARAYREH A. 2012. The licensing of negative sensitive items in Jordanian Arabic. Ph.D. thesis University of Kansas.

  • BAKER C. L. 1970. Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry vol. 1 pp. 169-186.

  • BENMAMOUN E. 1997. Licensing of negative polarity items in Moroccan Arabic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory vol. 15 pp. 263-287.

  • CHIERCHIA G. 2004. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In: A. Alexiadou E. Anagnostopoulou and M. Everaert eds. The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 22-59.

  • CHOMSKY N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In: M. Kenstowicz ed. Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press pp. 1-52.

  • DAYAL V. 1998. Any as inherently modal. Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 21 pp. 433-476.

  • DAYAL V. 2004. The universal force of free choice Any. Linguistic Variation Yearbook vol.

  • 4 pp. 5-40.

  • FAUCONNIER G. 1975. Polarity and the scale principle. Chicago Linguistics Society vol. 11 pp. 188-199.

  • FAUCONNIER G. 1979. Implication reversal in natural language. In: F. Guenthner and S. J. Scmidt eds. Formal semantics and pragmatics for natural languages. Dordrecht: Reidel pp. 289-302.

  • VON FINTEL K. 1999. NPI-licensing Strawson-entailment and context-dependency. Journal

  • of Semantics vol. 16 pp. 97-148.

  • GIANNAKIDOU A. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • GIANNAKIDOU A. 2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 24 pp.

  • GIANNAKIDOU A. 2006. Only emotive factive verbs and the dual nature of polarity dependency. Language vol. 82 pp. 575-603.

  • HASPELMATH M. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • HORN L. 1996. Exclusive company: Only and the dynamics of vertical inference. Journal of Semanticism vol. 13 pp. 1-40.

  • JAYEZ J. and TOVENA L. M. 2005. Free choiceness and non-individuation. Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 28 pp. 1-71.

  • KADMON N. and LANDMAN F. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 15 pp. 353-422.

  • LADUSAW W. 1980. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. New York: Garland.

  • LAHIRI U. 1998. Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Natural Language Semantics vol. 6 pp. 57-123.

  • LAKA I. 1990. Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Ph.D. Thesis MIT. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: Cambridge MA.

  • LASNIK H. 1975. On the semantics of negation. In: D. J. Hockney ed. Contemporary research in philosophical logic and linguistic semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel pp. 279-311.

  • LIN J. 1996. Polarity licensing and wh-phrase quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. thesis University of Massachusetts Amherst. Distributed by GLSA.

  • LINEBARGER M. 1987. Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 10 pp. 325-387.

  • NAM S. 1994. Another type of negative polarity. In: K. Makoto and C. Pinon eds. Dynamic polarity and quantification. CSLI: Stanford pp. 3-15.

  • NISHIGUCHI S. 2009. Bipolar items and attitude predicates. In: I. Kwon H. Pritchett and J. Spence eds. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society: CA USA pp. 424-435.

  • PROGOVAC L. 1993. Negative polarity: Entailment and binding. Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 16 pp. 149-180.

  • VENDLER Z. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • VAN DER WOUDEN T. 1994. Negative contexts. Ph.D. Thesis University of Groningen.

  • VAN DER WOUDEN T. 1994. Polarity and illogical negation. In: K. Makoto and C. Pinon eds. Dynamic polarity and quantification. CSLI: Stanford pp. 17-48.

  • ZWARTS F. 1995. Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis vol. 25 pp. 286-321.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.447

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 370 121 8
PDF Downloads 229 78 5