Vowel reduction patterns of early Spanish- English bilinguals receiving continuous L1 and L2 input

Open access


This study investigates the production of three morphophonetic variations of schwa in American English: the plural allomorph {-s} as in watches, the possessive allomorph {-s} as in Sasha’s, and word-finally as in Russia. The production of these three allomorphs were examined in Miami’s English monolingual and early Spanish-English bilingual populations. Our purpose was to determine how native-like early Spanish-English bilinguals′ spectral qualities and reduced vowel durations were compared to Miami English monolinguals during a reading task. Results indicate that early bilinguals′ reduced vowels followed the same overall pattern as monolinguals, but had different acoustic properties.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ANTONIOU M. BEST C.T. TYLER M.D. and KROOS C. 2011. Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic codeswitching. Journal of Phonetics vol. 39 no.4 pp. 558-570.

  • BARLOW J. BRANSON P. and NIP I. 2013. Phonetic equivalence in the acquisition of/l/by Spanish-English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition vol.16 no. 1 pp. 68-85.

  • BEAVER D. CLARK B. FLEMMING E. JAEGER T. and WOLTERS M. 2007. When semantics meets phonetics: Acoustical studies of second-occurrence focus. Language vol. 83 no. 2 pp.245-276.

  • BOERSMA P. 2002. Praat a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International vol. 5.

  • BONGAERTS T. PLANKEN B. and SCHILS E. 1995. Can late starters attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. The age factor in second language acquisition pp. 30-50.

  • BONGAERTS T. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In: D. Birdsong ed. Second language learning and the critical period hypothesis. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum Browman Associates pp. 133-159

  • BROWMAN C. and GOLDSTEIN L. 1992. Targetless schwa: An articulatory analysis. Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture Segment Prosody pp. 26-56.

  • BURZIO L. 2007. Phonology and phonetics of English stress and vowel reduction. Language Sciences vol. 29 pp. 154-176.

  • BYBEE J. 2012. Patterns of lexical diffusion and articulatory motivation for sound change. The initiation of sound change: Perception production and social factors pp. 211-234.

  • BYERS E. 2012. Reduced vowel production in American English among Spanish-English bilinguals. Miami Florida: Florida International University Electronic Thesis. Available at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1906&context=etd.

  • BYERS E. and YAVAS M. 2016. Durational variability of schwa in early and late Spanish-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism vol. 20 pp. 190-209.

  • CARTER P. and LYNCH A. 2015. Multilingual Miami: Current trends in sociolinguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass vol. 9 pp. 369-385.

  • CHOMSKY N. and HALLE M. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

  • DALBY J. 1986. Phonetic structure of fast speech in American English. Bloomington Indiana: Indiana University Press.

  • DUNN A. and FOXTREE J. 2009. A quick gradient bilingual dominance scale. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition vol. 12 pp. 273-289.

  • ENZINNA N. 2015. The Spanish-influenced prosody in Miami English. In: A. Chong et al. eds. Cornell Working Papers in Phonetics and Phonology. Ithaca New York: Cornell University Press pp. 78-120.

  • ENZINNA N. 2016. Spanish-influenced rhythm in Miami English. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America vol. 1 pp.34-41.

  • ERICKSON D. 2002. Articulation of extreme formant patterns for emphasized vowels. Phonetica vol. 59 no. 2-3 pp. 134-49.

  • FLEGE J.E. 1987. The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics vol.15 no.1 pp. 47-65.

  • FLEGE J. 1995. Second language speech learning theory findings and problems. In: W. Strange ed. Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Timonium MD: York Press pp. 78-104.

  • FLEGE J. E. 2005. Origins and development of the speech learning Model. Retrieved December 13 2005.

  • FLEGE J. BIRDSONG D. BIALYSTOK E. MACK M. SUNG H. and TSUKADA K. 2006. Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics vol. 34 no. 2 pp. 153-175.

  • FLEGE J.E. and BOHN O.S. 1989. An instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition vol.11 issue 1 pp. 35-62.

  • FLEMMING E. 2009. The phonetics of schwa vowels. In: D. Minkova ed. Phonological weakness in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan pp. 78-98.

  • FLEMMING E. and JOHNSON S. 2007. Rosa’s roses: Reduced vowels in American English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association vol. 37 pp. 83-96.

  • Florida International University. (2017). About us. Accessed 2-23-2017. Available at: http://www.fiu.edu/about-us/.

  • FOKES J. and BOND Z. 1993. The elusive/illusive syllable. Phonetica vol. 50 pp. 102-123.

  • FOURAKIS M. 1991. Tempo stress and vowel reduction in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America vol. 90 no. 4 pp. 1816-1827.

  • FOWLER C.A. and BRANCAZIO L. 2000. Coarticulation resistance of American English consonants and its effects on transconsonantal vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Language and Speech vol. 43 no. 1 pp. 1-41.

  • FOWLER C. SRAMKO V. OSTRY D. ROWLAND S. and HALLÉ P. 2008. Cross-language phonetic influences on the speech of French-English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics vol. 34 pp. 649-663.

  • GAHL S. YAO Y. and JOHNSON K. 2012. Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language vol. 66 no. 4 pp. 789-806.

  • GARDNER W. 1986. Measurement of spectral correlation. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing vol. 34 no. 5 pp. 1111-1123.

  • GICK B. 2002. An x-ray investigation of pharyngeal constriction in American English schwa. Phonetica vol. 59 pp. 38-48.

  • GOLDSTEIN L. 2011. Back to the past tense in English. Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen. Santa Cruz California: Linguistics Research Center pp. 69-88.

  • GROSJEAN F. 2008. Studying bilinguals. Boston MA: Oxford University Press.

  • GUION S.G. HARADA T. and CLARK J. 2004. Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition vol. 7 pp. 207-226.

  • GUT U. 2007. Foreign accent. Speaker classification I. Berlin: Springer Publishing pp.75-87.

  • GUT U. (2010): Cross-linguistic influence in l3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism vol. 7 pp. 19-38.

  • HAMMOND M. 1997. Vowel quantity and syllabification in English. Language pp. 1-17.

  • HAYES B. KIRCHNER R. and STERIADE D. 2008. Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • HERTRICH I. and ACKERMANN H. 1995. Coarticulation in slow speech: durational and spectral analysis. Language and Speech vol.38 no. 2 pp. 159-187.

  • HITCHCOCK L. and GREENBERG S. 2001. Vowel height is intimately associated with stress accent in spontaneous American English discourse. INTERSPEECH pp. 79-82.

  • HUBER J.E. et al. 1999. Formants of children women and men: The effects of vocal intensity variation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America vol.106 no.3 pp. 1532-1542

  • JOHNSON K. 2003. Acoustic and auditory phonetics. 2nd edition. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.

  • JONES D. 1922. An outline of English phonetics. Leipzig: Germany. BG Teubner.

  • KANG K.H. and GUION S.G. 2006. Phonological systems in bilinguals: Age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean-English bilinguals a. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America vol. 119 no.3 pp. 1672-1683.

  • KLATT D.1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America vol. 59 pp. 1208-1221.

  • KLATT D. and COOPER W. 1975. Perception of segment duration in sentence contexts. In Structure and process in speech perception. Berlin: Springer Publishing pp. 69-89.

  • KONDO Y. 1994. Targetless schwa: is that how we get the impression of stress timing in English. In: Proceedings of the Edinburgh Linguistics Department Conference vol. 94 pp. 63-76.

  • KUHL P. ANDRUSKI J. CHISTOVICH I. CHISTOVICH L. KOZHEVNIKOVA E. RYSKINA V. STOLYAROVA E. SUNDBERG U. and LACERDA F. 1997. Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science vol. 277 no. 5326 pp. 684-686.

  • LABOV W. ASH S. and BOBERG C. 2006. The atlas of North American English: Phonetics phonology and sound change. Berlin: Germany. Walter de Gruyter Publishing.

  • LADEFOGED P.1993. A course in phonetics. Fort Worth Texas: Hartcourt Publishing.

  • LENNES M. 2011. SpeCT- The Speech Corpus Toolkit for PRAAT (Script). Available at: http://www.helsinki.fi/~lennes/praat-scripts.

  • LEE B. GUION S. and HARADA T. 2006. Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition vol. 28 pp. 487-513.

  • LI P. ZHANG F. TSAI E. and PULS B. 2013. Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A new dynamic web-based research tool. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition vol. 17 pp. 673-680.

  • LINDBLOM B. 1963. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America vol. 35 pp. 1773-1781.

  • LINDBLOM B. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In: Speech production and speech modelling. The Netherlands: Springer Publishing pp. 403-439.

  • LOPEZ L. 2015. Vowels in the 305: A First Pass at Miami Latino English. Miami Florida: Florida International University Electronic Theses. Available at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3009&context=etd.

  • LULICH S. 2014. Combined analysis of real-time three-dimensional tongue ultrasound and digitized three-dimensional palate impressions: Methods and findings. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America vol. 24 pp. 2104-2104.

  • MARIAN V. BLUMENFELD H. and KAUSHANSKAYA M. 2007. The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research vol. 50 no. 4 pp. 940-967.

  • MARINOVA-TODD S. 2003. Comprehensive analysis of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Microfilms.

  • McAULIFFE M. ROBB M. and MURDOCH B. 2007. Acoustic and perceptial analysis of speech adaptation to an artificial palate. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics vol. 21 pp. 885-894.

  • MORRISON G. 2008. L1-Spanish speakers’ acquisition of the English/i/-/I/ contrast: Duration-based perception is not the initial developmental stage. Language and Speech vol. 51 pp. 285-315.

  • NEVINS A. 2011. Phonologically-conditioned allomorph selection. The Companion to Phonology pp. 2357-2382.

  • NUSBAUM H. PISONI D. and DAVIS C. 1984. Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20000 words. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report vol. 10 no. 10 pp. 357-376.

  • OLIVE J. GREENWOOD A. and COLEMAN J. 1993. Acoustics of American English Speech: A Dynamic Approach. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

  • OLLER D. EILERS R. URBANO R. and COBO-LEWIS A. 1997. Development of precursors to speech in infants exposed to two languages. Journal of Child Language vol. 24 pp. 407-425.

  • ORTEGA-LLEBARIA M. PRIETO P. and del MAR VANRELL M. 2007. Perceptual evidence for direct acoustic correlates of stress in Spanish. Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences pp. 1121-1124.

  • PETERSON G.E. and BARNEY H.L. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America vol. 24 no. 2 pp. 175-184.

  • PISKE T. FLEGE J. MACKAY I. and MEADOR D. 2002. The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica vol. 59 no. 1 pp. 49-71.

  • PLUYMAEKERS M. ERNESTUS M. and BAAYEN R.H. 2005. Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America vol.118 no. 4 pp. 2561-2569.

  • RONQUEST R. 2013. An acoustic examination of unstressed vowel reduction in heritage Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium pp. 151-171.

  • SANCIER M. and FOWLER C. 1997. Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics vol. 25 pp. 421-436.

  • SHOCKEY L. 2008. Sound patterns of spoken English. Hoboken New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

  • SILVERMAN D. 2011. Schwa. In: E. van Oostendorp E. and R. Hume eds. The Blackwell companion to phonology. Oxford England: Blackwell Publishing.

  • STEVENS K. and HOUSE A. 1963. Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: An acoustical study. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research.

  • TAUBERER J. and EVANINI K. 2009. Intrinsic vowel duration and the post-vocalic voicing effect: some evidence from dialects of North-American English. INTERSPEECH pp. 2211-2214.

  • TROFIMOVICH P. and BAKER W. 2006. Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition vol. 28 no. 1 pp. 1-30

  • UMEDA N. 1975. Vowel duration in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America vol. 58 no. 2 pp. 434-445.

  • VAN OOSTENDORP M. 1995. Vowel quality and syllable projection. Tilburg: Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.

  • WRIGHT R. 2003. Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In: J. Local R. Ogden and R. Temple eds. Papers in laboratory phonology VI: Phonetic interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp. 75-87.

  • YAVAŞ M. and BYERS E. 2014. Production of voiceless stops in early sequential bilinguals. Unusual productions in phonology: Universal and language-specific considerations. New York: Psychology Press pp. 242-258.

  • ZAMPINI M. 2008. L2 speech production research. Phonology and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing pp. 219-250.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.447

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 301 93 4
PDF Downloads 191 73 7