Bipolar Items

Open access

Abstract

This article asserts that the Japanese wide-scope mo ‘even’ in simple sentences are bipolar items (BPIs) antilicensed or forbidden by negation and licensed in a non-monotonic (NM) environment. BPIs share the features of negative polarity items (NPIs) as well as positive polarity items (PPIs). The Dutch ooit ‘ever’, the Serbo-Croatian i-series ‘and/even’, and the Hungarian is-series ‘and/even’ are antilicensed by clausemate negation and licensed by extraclausal negation (van der Wouden, 1997; Progovac, 1994; Szabolcsi, 2002) or non-monotonic negative (and positive, for Serbo-Croatian) emotive predicates. Adding an NPI rescues BPIs in uncomfortable clausemate negation.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ARONOFF M. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • ASHER N. 1987. A typology for attitude verbs and their anaphoric properties. Linguistics and Philosophy vol.10 pp.125-197.

  • BAKER C. L.1970. Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry vol.1 pp.169-186.

  • FÂLÂUS A. 2014. (Partially) Free choice of alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy vol.37 pp.121-173.

  • FAUCONNIER G. 1975a. Polarity and the scale principle. In: CLS 11 pp. 188-199.

  • FAUCONNIER G. 1975b. Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry vol.6 pp. 353-375.

  • von FINTEL K. 1999. NPI licensing Strawson entailment and context dependency. Journal of Semantics vol.16 pp.97-148.

  • HEIM I. 1992. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics vol.9 pp.183-221.

  • HOEKSEMA J. 1996. In days weeks months years ages: A class of negative polarity items. Ms.

  • HOEKSEMA J.1998. On the (non)loss of polarity sensitivity. In: Historical Linguistics 1995 vol. 2: Germanic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins pp.101-114.

  • JACKENDOFF R. S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • KARTTUNEN L. and PETERS S. 1979. Conventional implicature. In: Syntax and Semantics vol. 11. Presupposition. Academic Press.

  • KATO Y. 1985. Negative sentences in Japanese. Sophia Linguistica vol.14 pp.1-229.

  • KATO Y. 2000. Interpretive asymmetries of negation. In: Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 62-87.

  • LADUSAW W. A. 1979. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Ph.D. diss. University of Texas Austin.

  • LAMBRECHT K. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • NAM S. 1994. Another type of negative polarity item. In: Dynamics polarity and quantification. Stanford: CSLI pp.3-15.

  • NISHIGUCHI S. 2003. Non-monotonic Negativity. In D. H. Ji et al. eds. Proceedings of PACLIC 17. Sentosa Singapore: COLIPS pp. 204-215.

  • NISHIGUCHI S. 2004. Five Types of Affective Contexts: Nonmonotonic NPI Licensers. In N. Adams et al. eds. CLS 40-1. Chicago: The Chicago Linguistic Society pp. 249-264.

  • NUMATA Y. 2000. Toritate [focus]. In: S. Kinsui M. Kudo and Y. Numata eds. Toki hitei to toritate. Tokyo: Iwanami pp.151-216.

  • PROGOVAC L. 1994. Negative and positive polarity: A binding approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • ROOTH M. 1985. Association with Focus. PhD Thesis University of Massachusetts Amherst GLSA Publications.

  • SADANOBU T. 1997. Shinteki prosesu kara mita toritateshi te demo ni-hongo no shudai to toritate. Tokyo: Kuroshio pp.227-260.

  • SZABOLCSI A. 2002. Hungarian disjunctions and positive polarity. In: Approaches to Hungarian vol. 8 Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

  • van der WOUDEN T. 1994. Negative contexts. PhD thesis University of Groningen.

  • van der WOUDEN T. 1997. Negative contexts: Collocation polarity and multiple negation. London: Routledge.

  • WATANABE A. 2004. The genesis of negative concord: Syntax and morphology of negative doubling. Linguistic Inquiry vol.35 pp.559-612.

  • YAMAMORI Y. 2015. Perspective shift-to kongo waho [Perspective Shift and Blended Speech in Japanese]. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.

  • YOSHIMURA A. 1999. Hitei kyokusei gensho [Negative Polarity Phenomena]. Tokyo: Eihosha.

  • ZWARTS F. 1996. A hierarchy of negative expressions. In: H. Wansing ed. Negation: A notion in focus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter pp.169-194.

  • ZWARTS F. 1998. Three types of polarity. In: F. Hamm and E. Hinrichs eds. Plurality and quantification. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic pp.177-238.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.447

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 205 72 7
PDF Downloads 125 56 11