The gradual acquisition of clitic “se” in Spanish L2

Open access


In this study, we analyse the nature of clitic “se” and low applicatives in Spanish L2 through the study of the non-native acquisition of this clitic by L1 English adult learners. In particular, we are going to discuss the question of how English adults acquire this clitic in the different syntactic configurations where it appears (anticausative inchoative verbs, inherent reflexive verbs, transitive verbs implying an inalienable possession relation, consumption verbs and non-anticausative inchoative verbs). Our main research hypothesis is that the acquisition of clitic “se” with some types of applicatives takes place in the later stages of the learning process, since it requires exposure to certain linguistic evidence to acquire a certain type of argument structure proper to applicatives. This study is going to be based on how our subjects perform using Grammaticality Judgment Tests (GJTs).

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • BECK M.L. 1998. L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition vol. 20 pp. 311-348.

  • CLAHSEN H. 1990. Constrain on parameter setting: A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language. Language Acquisition vol. 1 pp. 361-391.

  • CLAHSEN H. PENKE M. and PARODI T. 1993. Functional categories in early child German. Language Acquisition vol. 3 pp. 395-429.

  • CUERVO M. C. 2003. Datives at large. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts: MIT.

  • ESCOBAR L. and TORRENS V. 2010. The effect of reflexive clitics on the aspectual properties of child language. In: P. Guijarro Fuentes and L. Domínguez. eds. New directions in language acquisition: Romance languages in the generative perspective. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing pp. 25-49.

  • EUBANK L. BISCHOF I. HUFFSTUTLER A. LEEK P. and WEST C. 1997. Tom eats slowly cooked eggs: Thematic verb raising in L2 knowledge. Language Acquisition vol. 6 pp.171-199.

  • FERNÁNDEZ SORIANO O. M. and MENDIKOETXEA A. 2011. Non-selected dative subjects in anticausative constructions. Archivio Glottologico Italiano vol. 96 no. 1 pp. 87-127.

  • HAZNEDAR B. 2001. The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition vol. 23 pp. 1-39.

  • HAZNEDAR B. 2003. Missing surface inflection in adult and child L2 acquisition. In: J.M. Liceras et al. eds. Proceedings of the 6th generative approaches to second language acquisition conference (GASLA 2002). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project pp.140-149.

  • LARDIERE D. 2000. Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In: J. Archibald ed. Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. Oxford: Blackwell pp. 103-129.

  • LARDIERE D. 2008. Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In: J. Liceras H. Zobl and H. Goodluck eds. The role of features in second language acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates pp. 106-140.

  • MEISEL J. 1997. The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: Contrasting first and second language development. Second Language Research vol. 13 pp. 227-263.

  • MEISEL J. and MÜLLER N. 1992. Verb placement and the position of finiteness in early child grammar. In: J. Meisel ed. The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer pp. 106-140.

  • PARODI T. 2013. Universal grammar and second language acquisition. In: The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • PRÉVOST P. and WHITE I. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research vol. 16 pp. 103-133.

  • PYLKKÄNEN L. 2002. Introducing arguments. Doctoral Dissertation MIT.

  • ROMERO C. and TEOMIRO I. 2012. La relación entre estructura eventiva y papeles temáticos: el se aspectual del español. Revista de Filología Románica vol. 29 no. 2 pp. 233-243.

  • TEOMIRO I. In press. Pronominal verbs in European languages: What Spanish alternating pronominal verbs reveal. In: J. Barðdal M. Cennamo L. Hellan A. Kibort and A. Malchukov eds. Valency in European languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • TEOMIRO I. 2013. Low applicatives and optional “se” in Spanish non-anticausative intransitive verbs. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas vol. 8 pp. 248-270.

  • TEOMIRO I. 2011. Reflexivity and adjustment strategies at the interfaces. Tromsø Nordlyd Working Papers in Linguistics vol. 37 pp. 119-149.

  • TEOMIRO I. 2010. Anaphors at the interfaces. A comparative study of the variation of the anaphoric systems of English Dutch and Spanish. Doctoral dissertation. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

  • TEOMIRO I. and ESCOBAR L. 2013. The acquisition of dative “se” in L1 Spanish and its implications for the Weak Continuity Hypothesis of Acquisition of Functional Categories. RESLA vol. 26 pp. 475-490.

  • VAINIKKA A. and YOUNG-SCHOLTEN M. 2009. Successful features: Verb raising and adverbs in L2 acquisition under an Organic Grammar approach. In: N. Snape Y.I. Leung and M. Sharwood Smith eds. Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins. Amsterdam: John Benjamins pp. 53-68.

  • WHITE L. 2003. Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.447

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 299 116 1
PDF Downloads 180 69 1