Textual meaning and its place in a theory of language

Open access

Abstract

Following the development of a framework for critical stylistics (Jeffries 2010) and the explication of some of the theoretical assumptions behind this framework (Jeffries 2014a, 2014b, 2015a, 2015b), the present article attempts to put this framework into a larger theoretical context as a way to approach textual meaning. Using examples from the popular U.S. television show, The Big Bang Theory, I examine the evidence that there is a kind of textual meaning which can be distinguished from the core propositional meaning on the one hand and from contextual, interpersonal meaning on the other. The specific aim, to demonstrate a layer of meaning belonging to text specifically, is set within an argument which claims that progress in linguistics can better be served by adherence to a rigorous scientific discipline.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • CHOMSKY N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge Mass: M.I.T. Press.

  • COULTHARD M. 1992. Advances in spoken discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge.

  • FAIRCLOUGH N. 2001. Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak R. and M. Meyer eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage pp. 121 – 138.

  • GOFFMAN E. 1981. Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • HALLIDAY M.A.K. and MATTHIESSEN C.M.I.M. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

  • HARRIS R. 1999. Integrational linguistics and the structuralist legacy. Language and Communication vol. 19 no. 1 pp. 45-68.

  • JEFFRIES L. 2000. Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater: in defence of theoretical eclecticism in stylistics. Working Paper 12. Poetics and Linguistics Association.

  • JEFFRIES L. 2001. Schema theory and White Asparagus: readers of literature as culturally multilingual. Language and Literature vol 10 no 4 pp. 325-43.

  • JEFFRIES L. 2010a. Opposition in Discourse. London: Continuum Books.

  • JEFFRIES L. 2010b. Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • JEFFRIES L. 2014a. Interpretation. In The Handbook of Stylistics. P. Stockwell and S. Whiteley eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp. 469 – 486.

  • JEFFRIES L. 2014b. Critical Stylistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. M. Burke ed. London: Routledge. pp. 408 – 420.

  • JEFFRIES L. 2015a. Critical and Cultural Stylistics. In The Continuum Companion to Stylistics. V. Sotirova ed. London: Bloomsbury. pp. 157 – 175.

  • JEFFRIES L. 2015b. Language and Ideology. In Introducing Language and Linguistics. N. Braber L. Cummings and Morrish eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp. 379 – 405.

  • NAHAJEC L. 2009 “Negation and the creation of implicit meaning in poetry” Language and Literature vol. 18 no. 2 pp. 109-127.

  • PETRUS K. 2010 ed. Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • SAUSSURE F. 1916. Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot Seidenberg.

  • SPERBER D. and WILSON D. 2004. The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • TOOLAN M. 1996. Total speech: an integrational linguistic approach to language Durham N.C.: Duke University Press.

  • WERTH P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.447

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1049 459 18
PDF Downloads 496 248 19