An experimental approach to ambisyllabicity in English

Open access


The factors that influence English speakers to classify a consonant as ambisyllabic are explored in 581 bisyllabic words. The /b/ in habit, for example, was considered ambisyllabic when a participant chose hab as the first part of the word and bit as the second. Geminate spelling was found to interact with social variables; older participants and more educated speakers provided more ambisyllabic responses. The influence of word-level phonotactics on syllabification was also evident. A consonant such as the medial /d/ in standard is attested as the second consonant in the coda of many English words (e.g. lard), as well as in the single-consonant onset of many others; for this reason such consonants were often made ambisyllabic. This contrasts with the /n/ in standard, which is never the first consonant in a word-initial cluster (e.g. *ndorf) and, therefore, rarely made ambisyllabic in the experiment. Ambisyllabicity was also found more often when the vowel preceding the single medialconsonant was lax, or stressed, or when the medial-consonant was a sonorant rather than an obstruent. The idea that a stressed lax vowel in the first syllable conditions both the ambisyllabicity of the consonant and its geminate spelling is not supported.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ANDERSON J. and EWEN C. 1987. Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • ANDERSON J. M. and JONES C. 1974. Three theses concerning phonological representations. Journal of Linguistics vol. 10 pp. 1-26.

  • BAILEY C. J. N. 1980. Evidence for variable syllable boundaries in English. In: L. R. Waugh and C. H. Schoonevelt eds. The melody of language. Baltimore: University Park Press pp. 25-39.

  • BALOTA D. A. YAP M. J. CORTESE M. J. HUTCHINSON K. A. KESSLER B LOFTIS B. NEELY J. H. NELSON D. L. SIMPSON G. B. and TREIMAN R. 2007. The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods vol. 39 pp. 445-459.

  • BOROWSKY T. ITÔ J. and MESTER R.-A. 1984. The formal representation of ambisyllabicity: evidence from Danish. NELS vol. 14 pp. 34-48.

  • BRIERE E. J. CAMPBELL R. M. and SOEMARMO M. 1968. A need for the syllable in contrastive analysis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior vol. 7 pp. 384-389.

  • CHARETTE M. 1990. License to govern. Phonology vol. 7 pp. 233-253.

  • DERWING B. L. 1992. A ‘pause-break’ task for eliciting syllable boundary judgments from literate and illiterate speakers: Preliminary results for five diverse languages. Language and Speech vol. 35 pp. 219-235.

  • EDDINGTON D. and ELZINGA D. 2008. The phonetic context of flapping in American English: quantitative evidence. Language and Speech vol. 51 pp. 245-266.

  • FALLOWS D.H. 1981. Experimental evidence for English syllabification and syllable structure. Journal of Linguistics vol. 17 pp. 309-317.

  • GIEGERICH H. 1992. English phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • GOLDSMITH J. A. 1999. Phonological theory: The essential readings. Malden MA: Blackwell.

  • GUSSENHOVEN C. 1986. English plosive allophones and ambisyllabicity. Gramma vol. 10 pp. 119-141.

  • HAMMOND M. 1999. The phonology of English: A prosodic optimality-theoretic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • HARRIS J. 1994. English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • HARRIS J. and GUSSMANN E. 2002 Word-final Onsets. University College of London Working Papers in Linguistics vol. 14 pp. 1-42.

  • HERMANN E. 1923. Silbenbildung im griechischen und in den anderen indogermanischen sprachen. Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht. HOOPER J. 1978. Constraints on schwa deletion in American English. In: J. Fisiak ed. Recent developments in historical phonology. The Hague: Mouton pp.183-207. HOOPER J. B. 1972. The syllable in phonological theory. Language vol. 48 pp. 525-540.

  • ISHIKAWA K. 2002. Syllabification of Intervocalic consonants by English and Japanese Speakers. Language and Speech vol. 45 pp. 355-385.

  • JONES C. 1976. Some constraints on medial consonant clusters. Language vol. 52 pp. 121-30.

  • KAHN D. 1976. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

  • KAYE J. 1990. ‘Coda’ licensing. Phonology vol. 7 pp. 301-330.

  • KAYE J. J. LOWENSTAMM J.-R. VERGNAUD. 1990. Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology vol. 7 pp. 193-231.

  • KENSTOWICZ M. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.

  • KIPARSKY P. 1979. Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry vol. 10 pp. 421-441.

  • KREIDLER C. W. 1989. The pronunciation of English: A course book in phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • PICARD M. 1984. English aspiration and flapping revisited. Canadian Journal of Linguistics vol. 29 pp. 432-457.

  • SELKIRK E. O. 1982. The syllable. In: H. van der Hulst and N. Smith eds. The structure of phonological representations II. Dordrecht: Foris pp.337-383.

  • SIGLEY R. 2003. The importance of interaction effects. Language Variation and Change vol. 15 pp. 227-253.

  • STEMBERGER. J. P. 1983. Speech errors and theoretical phonology. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

  • TREIMAN R. and DANIS C. 1988. Syllabification of intervocalic consonants. Journal of Memory and Language vol. 27 pp. 87-104.

  • TREIMAN R. and ZUKOWSKI A. 1990. Toward an understanding of English syllabification. Journal of Memory and Language vol. 29 pp. 66-85.

  • TREIMAN R. BOWEY J. A. and BOURASSA D. 2002. Segmentation of spoken words into syllables by English-speaking children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology vol. 83 pp. 213-238.

  • WELLS J. C. 1990. Syllabification and allophony. In: S. Ramsaran ed. Studies in the pronunciation of English: A commemorative volume in honor of A. C. Gimson. London and New York: Routledge pp.76-86.

  • ZAMUNER T. S. and OHALA D. K. 1999. Preliterate children’s syllabification of intervocalic consonants. In: A. Greenhill H. Littlefield and C. Tano eds. Proceedings of the 23rd annual Boston Conference on Language Development. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press pp.753-763.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.447

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 261 172 8
PDF Downloads 165 119 5