The relationship between Prospero and Miranda is fairly typical for Shakespeare’s way of portraying parental authority and filial obligation. A strong and authoritative father, an absent mother and a (potentially) rebellious daughter are character types reused in many of his plays. In The Tempest, authority, power and ownership, be it political or domestic, are important themes. In criticism, Prospero is frequently discussed through the prism of his attitude to his “subordinates”—Ariel, Caliban and Miranda—and the play’s narrative is interpreted in the context of the theatre of power. Parental authority, a social construct, is a dynamic thing, and the Renaissance patterns discernible in Shakespeare’s plays are refashioned and changed in contemporary adaptations and appropriations of his plays. Informed by New Historicism and Cultural Materialism in relation to gender studies, this article seeks to examine the changing dynamics of the Prospero-Miranda relationship in three films—Derek Jarman’s (1979), Paul Mazursky’s (1982), and Julie Taymor’s (2010)—as well as Philip Osment’s 1988 play This Island’s Mine. Focusing on the issue of authority, power and ownership, the article aims at showing how stereotypical social and gender roles resonate with various political contexts of power.
Bennett, Susan. Performing Nostalgia: Shifting Shakespeare and the Contemporary Past. London: Routledge, 1996. Print.
Boose, Lynda E. “The Father and the Bride in Shakespeare.” PMLA 97 (1982): 325–47. Print.
Buchanan, Judith. Shakespeare on Film. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2005. Print.
Chedgzoy, Kate. Shakespeare’s Queer Children. Sexual Politics and Contemporary Culture. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1995. Print.
Churchill, Caryl. Caryl Churchill: Plays 1. London: Methuen, 1996. Print.
Collick, John. Shakespeare, Cinema and Society. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1989. Print.
The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (Abridged). Dir. Paul Kafro. Perf. Reduced Shakespeare Company. Acorn Media, 2003. DVD.
Ebert, Roger. “The Tempest.” Rev. of The Tempest, by Julie Taymor. Rogerebert.com. Ebert Digital 15 Dec. 2010. Web. 10 May 2014.
Fischlin, Daniel, and Mark Fortier, eds. Adaptations of Shakespeare. A Critical Anthology of Plays From the Seventeenth Century to the Present. London: Routledge, 2000. Print.
Fletcher, Hattie, and Marianne Novy. “Father-Child Identification, Loss and Gender in Shakespeare’s Plays.” Shakespeare and Childhood. Ed. Kate Chedgzoy, Susanne Greenhalgh and Robert Shaughnessy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007. 49–63. Print.
Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988. Print.
Harris, Diana, and MacDonald Jackson. “Stormy Weather: Derek Jarman’s The Tempest.” Literature/Film Quarterly 25.2 (1997): 90–98. Print.
Hoy, Cyrus. “Fathers and Daughters in Shakespeare’s Romances.” Shakespeare’s Romances Reconsidered. Ed. Carol McGinnis Kay and Henry E. Jacobs. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1978. 77–90. Print.
Jordison, Sam. “The Tempest Casts Strange Spells at the Cinema.” Theguardian.com. The Guardian 24 Apr. 2014. Web. 20 Mar. 2015.
Osment, Philip. “This Island’s Mine.” Adaptations of Shakespeare. A Critical Anthology of Plays From the Seventeenth Century to the Present. Ed. Daniel Fischlin and Mark Fortier. London: Routledge, 2000. 258–84. Print.
Prospero’s Books. Dir. Peter Greenaway. Perf. John Gielgud, Isabelle Pasco. Allarts, 1991. Film.
Renes, Cornelis Martin. “Whose New World? Derek Jarman’s Subversive Vision of The Tempest (1979).” Barcelona English Language and Literature Studies 17 (2008): 1–12. Web. 12 Mar. 2014.