This essay begins by examining the rhetorical significance of the guillotine, an important symbol during the Romantic Period. Lacefield argues that the guillotine symbolized a range of modern ontological juxtapositions and antinomies during the period. Moreover, she argues that the guillotine influenced Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein through Giovanni Aldini, a scientist who experimented on guillotined corpses during the French Revolution and inspired Shelley’s characterization of Victor Frankenstein. Given the importance of the guillotine as a powerful metaphor for anxieties emergent during this period, Lacefield employs it as a clue signaling a labyrinth of modern meanings embedded in Shelley’s novel, as well as the films they anticipated. In particular, Lacefield analyzes the significance of the guillotine slice itself—the uneasy, indeterminate line that simultaneously separates and joins categories such as life/death, mind/body, spirit/matter, and nature/technology.
Lacefield’s interdisciplinary analysis analyzes motifs of decapitation/dismemberment in Frankenstein and then moves into a discussion of the novel’s exploration of the ontological categories specified above. For example, Frankenstein’s Creature, as a kind of cyborg, exists on the contested theoretical “slice” within a number of antinomies: nature/tech, human/inhuman (alive/dead), matter/spirit, etc. These are interesting juxtapositions that point to tensions within each set of categories, and Lacefield discusses the relevance of such dichotomies for questions of modernity posed by materialist theory and technological innovation. Additionally, she incorporates a discussion of films that fuse Shelley’s themes with appeals to twentieth-century and post-millennium audiences.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Aldini, Giovanni, and Robert Hooper. An Account of the Late Improvements in Galvanism. 1809. Ulan, 2012. Print.
Ball, John Clement. “Imperial Monstrosities: Frankenstein, the West Indies, and V.S. Naipaul.” Ariel: A Review of English Literature 32.3 (2001): 31–58. Print.
Bewell, Alan. “‘An Issue of Monstrous Desire’: Frankenstein and Obstetrics.” Yale Journal of Criticism 2.1 (Fall 1998): 105–28. Print.
Canuel, Mark. The Shadow of Death: Literature, Romanticism, and the Subject of Punishment. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2007. Print.
Censer, Jack R., and Lynn Avery Hunt, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity: Exploring the French Revolution. Pittsburgh: Penn State UP, 2001. Print.
Comray, Rebecca. Mourning Sickness: Hegel and the French Revolution. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2010. Print.
Darnton, Robert. The Forbidden Best Sellers of Pre-Revolutionary France. New York: Norton, 1996. Print.
Dash, Mike. The Limit: Engineering on the Boundaries of Science. London: London Bridge, 1995. Print.
Gay, Peter. Enlightenment: The Science of Freedom. New York: Norton, 1996. Print.
Janes, Regina. Losing Our Heads: Beheadings in Literature and Culture. New York: NYUP, 2005. Print.
Kershaw, Alistar. A History of the Guillotine. New York: Barnes, 1993. Print.
McLaren, Angus. The History of Contraception: From Antiquity to the Present Day. New York: Blackwell, 1992. Print.
Machow, H. L. Gothic Images of Race in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1996. Print.
Moers, Ellen. Literary Women: The Great Writers. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1985. Print.
Pagden, Anthony. The Enlightenment and Why It Still Matters. New York: Random, 2013. Print.
Porter, Roy. Flesh in the Age of Reason. New York: Norton, 2005. Print.
Sauer, R. “Infanticide and Abortion in Nineteenth-Century Britain.” Population Studies 32.1 (1978): 81–93. Print.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Ed. D.L. Macdonald and Kathleen Scherf. 3rd Edition. New York: Broadview, 2012. Print.
Vila, Anne C. Enlightenment and Pathology: Sensibility in the Literature and Medicine of Eighteenth-Century France. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1997. Print.
Wilentz, Amy. “A Zombie is a Slave Forever.” The New York Times 30 Oct. 2012. Print.