Non-Destructive Analysis of Surface Integrity on Parts from Austenitic Steel for Nuclear Industry


This article is focused on non-destructive detection method of residual stress and chemical properties of stainless steel. By X-ray diffractometry, there it is possible to determine accurately the values of residual stress and austenite percentage without any damage the sample without any change of its original function. Identification of residual stress and its distribution can improve the prediction of failures or damage incidences due to workload over lifetime of components. It can be also used as one of evaluation parameter of suitability of applied manufacturing technological operations.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] C. A. Griffiths, C.A. (1989). Closing the Loop on Product Integrity on Bearings with Engineered Source Approval, Split Ballbearing Features, Company Newsletter,

  • [2] Ganev N., Kraus I. (2002): X-ray diffraction measurement of residual stresses, Material Structure, vol 9., No. 2

  • [3] Tiitto, K. et al. (1991): Testing Shot Peening Stresses in the Field, The Shot Peener, vol. 4,

  • [4] Cep, R., Petru, J., Zlamal, T., Valicek, J., Harnicarova, M., Janasek, A., Cepova, L. (2013): Influence of feed speed on machined surface quality. In 22nd International Conferen-ce on Metallurgy and Materials, Conference proceedings, pp. 1033-1038.

  • [5] Pala, Z., Kolarik, K., Ganev, N., Capek, J. (2013): Study of residual stress surface distribution on laser welded steel sheets on 51st Annual of the International Scientific Conference on Experimental Stress Analysis.

  • [6] Sapietova, A., Saga, M., Novak, P. (2012): Multi-software Platform for Solving of Multibody Systems Synthesis, Com-munications, vol. 14, No. 3, 43-48, ISSN 1335-4205

  • [7] Prevéy, P.S. (1986): X-ray Diffraction Residual Stress Techniques, Metals Handbook 10, Metals Park: American Society for Metals, p. 380-392,.

  • [8] Fitzpatrick, M.E. (2005). Determination of Residual Stresses by X-ray Diffraction. Measurement Good Practice No. 52. National Physical Laboratory, Teddlingtoon.

  • [9] Stancekova, D., Semcer, J., Holubjak, J., Drbul, M. (2014): Machinability of nano-structured biomaterials for dental implants. In Communications, vol. 16, No. 3A, 96-100,

  • [10] Brezina, M., Kupca, L. (2008): Stress corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steel in a nuclear power plant enviroment. Enviroment inducted cracking of materials. Department of Structural Analysis, VUJE Inc, Trnava, p. 431 - 436,

  • [11] Czan, A. , Tillova, E., Semcer, J., Pilc, J. (2013): Surface and subsurface residual stresses after machining and their analysis by X-ray diffraction. In. Comunications, Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 69-76.

  • [12] Náprstková, N., Holešovský, F. (2007): Admeasurement of Grinding Wheel Loss at FPTM. In 24th International Colloquium (Advanced manufacturing and repair technologies, s.159-164.

  • [13] Vasilko, K., Pilc, J. (2013): New technological knowledge of the rotary turning tool, Journal Manufacturing Technology, Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 571-575,

  • [14] Cep, R., Janasek A., Petru J., Cepova L., Czan A., Valicek J. (2013) Hard Machinable Machining of Cobalt-based Superalloy. In Manufacturing Technology XIII/13 . UJEP: Ústi n. Labem. p. 226-231.

  • [15] Czan, A., Sajgalik, M., Martikan, A., Mrazik, J. (2014): Observation of dynamic processes in cutting zone when machining nickel alloys. In Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, vol. 16, No. 3A, 161-168.


Journal + Issues