Mathematical models describing aerial spraying and the distribution of liquid droplets on a target were presented. Relationships based on “free models” with Gaussian distribution of droplet concentrations and “bound models” that account for the impact of disturbances in the velocity field behind agricultural aircraft were expanded, and the hybrid model too. The results of experimental studies were presented and compared with theoretical calculations. The “bound model” was found to be the most effective solution for describing the physical phenomena that accompany the aerial spraying process.
 Slade D.H. 1966. Summary Measurements of Dispersion from Quasi Instantaneous Sources. Nuclear Safety 7(2).
 Stenke W.E. Yates W.E. 1988. Modifying Gaussian Models to Obtain Improved Drift Prediction. Agricultural Engineering Department University of California Davis.
 Teske M.E Thistle H.W. Londergan R.J. 2011. Modification of Droplets Evaporation in the Symulation of Fine Droplet Motion using AGDISP. Tran. of ASAE 54(2) p. 417-421.
 Teske M.E. Thistle H.W. Schou W.C. Miller P.C.H. Strager J.M. Richardson B. Butler E.M.C. Barry J.W. Twardus D.B. Thompson D.G. 2011. A Review of Computer Models for pesticide Deposition Prediction. Trans. ASAE 54(3): p. 789-801.
 Trayford R.S. Welch L.W. 1977. Aerial Spraying.: A Simulation of Factors Influencing the Distributionand Recovery of Liquid Droplets. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research Vol. 22: p. 183-196.
 Wickens R.H. 1977. Calculation of Wake Vortex Trajectories for Low Flying Spraying 2 Aircraft. National Aero Report LTR-LA-215 Nat. Res. Council. Canada.