Quantitative Visualisation of Compressible Flows

Open access

Abstract

The paper demonstrates the feasibility of quantitative flow visualisation methods for investigation of transonic and supersonic flows. Two methods and their application for retrieving compressible flow field properties has been described: Background Oriented Schlieren (BOS) and Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). Recently introduced BOS technique extends the capabilities of classical Schlieren technique by use of digital image processing and allow to measure density gradients field. In the presented paper a review of applications of BOS technique has been presented. The PIV is well established technique for whole field velocity measurements. This paper presents application of PIV for determination of the shock wave position above airfoil in transonic flow regime. The study showed that application of quantitative flow visualisation techniques allows to gain new insights on the complex phenomenon of supersonic and transonic flow over airfoils like shock-boundary layer interaction and shock induced flow separation.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Anderson J.D. 2004 “Fundamentals of Aerodynamics” 5th edition McGraw-Hill’s

  • [2] Galinski C. and Goraj Z. 2004 “Experimental and numerical results obtained for a scaled RPV and a full size aircraft” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology No. 76 pp. 305-313.

  • [3] Żółtak J. and Stalewski W. 2014 “Preliminary Design of the Air-Intake System and the Nacelle in the Small Aircraft-Engine Integration Process” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology No. 86 pp. 250-258.

  • [4] Lee B.H.K. 1989 “Investigation of flow separation on a supercritical airfoil” Journal of Aircraft No. 26 pp. 1032-1039.

  • [5] Adrian R.J. 1991 “Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics No. 23 pp. 261-304.

  • [6] Wilert C.E. Gharib M. 1991 “Digital particle image velocimetry” Experiments in Fluids No. 10 pp. 181-193.

  • [7] Parsad A.K. 2000 “Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry” Experiments in Fluids No. 29 pp. 103-116.

  • [8] Scarano F. 2013 “Tomographic PIV: principles and practice” Measurement Science and Technology No. 24 pp. 1-28.

  • [9] Raffel M. 2015 “Background-oriented schlieren (BOS) techniques” Experiments in Fluids No. 56 p. 60.

  • [10] Stryczniewicz W. 2012 “Development of Particle Image Velocimetry Algorithm” Problems of Mechatronics No. 9 pp. 41-54.

  • [11] Venkatakrishnan L. Meier G.E.A. 2004 “Density measurements using the Background Oriented Schlieren technique” Experiments in Fluids No. 37 pp. 237-247.

  • [12] Manovski P. Wehrmeyer J. Scott K. Loxton B. Quick H. Lam S. and Giacobello M. 2016 “A Performance Comparison between Classical Schlieren and Background-Oriented Schlieren” 18th International Symposium on the Application of Laser and Imaging Techniques to Fluid Mechanics Lisbon June 04-07.

  • [13] Clem M.M. Zamam K.B.M.Q. and Fagan A. F. 2012 “Background Oriented Schlieren Applied to Study Shock Spacing in a Screeching Circular Jet” 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition Nashville January 09-12.

  • [14] Heineek J. T. Banks D. W. Schairer E. T. Haering E. A. and Bean P. S. 2016 “Background Oriented Schlieren (BOS) of a Supersonic Aircraft in Flight” AIAA Flight Testing Conference Washington D.C. June 13-17.

  • [15] Bauknecht A. Merz C.B. and Raffel M. 2014 “Airborne Application of the Background Oriented Schlieren Technique to a Helicopter in Forward Flight” 17th International Symposium on the Application of Laser and Imaging Techniques to Fluid Mechanics Lisbon June 07-10.

  • [16] Raffel M. Willert C.E. Wereley S.T. and Kompenhans J. 2007 “Particle Image Velocimetry a practical guide”. 2nd edition Springer-Verlag.

  • [17] Surmacz K. Ruchała P and Stryczniewicz W. 2016 “Wind tunel tests of the developement and demise of Vortex Ring State of the rotor”. In Kleiber Advances in Mechanics: Theoretical Computational and Interdisciplinary Issues CRC Press.

  • [18] Urban J.M. Zloczewska A Stryczniewicz W and Jönsson-Niedziolka M. 2013 “Enzymatic oxygen reduction under quiescent conditions – The importance of convection” Electrochemistry Communications No. 34 pp. 94-97.

  • [19] Jun Z. Zhenghong G. Hao Z. and Junqiang B. 2009 “A high-speed nature laminar flow airfoil and its experimental study in wind tunnel with nonintrusive measurement technique” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics No. 22 pp. 225-229.

  • [20] Raffel M. and Kompenhaus J. 1993 “PIV measurements of unsteady transonic flow fields above a NACA 0012 airfoil” Laser Anemometry Advances and Applications No. 2052 pp. 527-534.

  • [21] Giepman R.H.M. Schrijer F.F.J. and van Oudheusden B. W. 2015 “High-resolution PIV measurements of a transitional shock” Experiments in Fluids No. 56 pp. 113-133.

  • [22] Hartmann A. Klaas M. and Schröder W. 2010 “Time resolved stereo PIV measurements of unsteady shock-boundary layer interaction on a supercritical airfoil” 15th Int Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics Lisbon July 5-8.

  • [23] Wiśniowski W. 2014 “Specializations of the Institute of Aviation – review and conclusions” Transactions of the Institute of Aviation No. 235 pp 7-16.

  • [24] Stryczniewicz W. and Surmacz K. 2014 “PIV Measurements of the Vortex Ring State of the Main Rotor of a Helicopter” Transactions of the Institute of Aviation No. 235 pp. 17-27.

  • [25] McDevitt J.B. Levy L.L. Jr. and Deiwert G. S. 1976 “Transonic Flow About a Thick Circular-Arc Airfoil” AIAA Journal No. 14 pp. 606-613.

  • [26] Mundell A.R.G. and Mabey D.G. 1986 “Pressure fluctuations caused by transonic shock/boundary-layer interaction” Aeronautical Journal No. 90 pp. 274-282.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 28 28 4
PDF Downloads 29 29 17