A Fatigue Monitoring Tool (FMT) model was constructed for an operational airline in order to manage the fatigue levels of their crews in accordance with Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) practices. This article describes the implementation of the Fatigue Monitoring Tool model and the airline’s aims to put the recent scientific findings on aviation fatigue into practical use. The model consists of proxy points allotted to various duties and rest periods.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
 International Civil Aviation Organization, Procedures for Air Navigation Services: Air Traffic Management, 15th ed., Annex 6: Operation of Aircraft. Canada, Montreal, Quebec: ICAO, 2010. Available: http://code7700.com/pdfs/icao_annex_6_part_i.pdf [Accessed: September 15, 2017].
 J. A. Caldwell, “Crew Schedules, Sleep Deprivation, and Aviation Performance,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 21, no. 2., pp. 85–89, Mar. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411435842
 K. Avers and W. B. Johnson, “A Review of Federal Aviation Administration Fatigue Research: Transitioning Scientific Results to the Aviation Industry,” Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 87–98, Jan. 2011. http://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000016
 P. Gander, L. Hartley, D. Powell, P. Cabon, E. Hitchcock, A. Mills, and S. Popkin, “Fatigue Risk Management: Organizational Factors at the Regulatory and Industry/Company Level,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 573–590, Mar. 2011. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.007
 J. A. Caldwell, M. M. Mallis, J. L. Caldwell, M. A. Paul, J. C. Miller, and D. F. Neri, “Fatigue Countermeasures in Aviation,” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 29–59, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.2435.2009