Standard-Setters Versus Big4 Opinion, Concerning Iasb Revision Project of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. the Case of Presentation and Disclosures Chapter

Open access


On the last decades the accounting system haven‘t been able to follow the dynamics of the economic systems generated by the globalization process. In order to reduce the lag between the demand of financial information and the offer of financial information, IASB has started numerous initiatives aiming the increase on the quality of the financial information. Among the current list of current IASB major projects there is also the project of revising the actual conceptual framework for financial reporting. This study is designed to give some directions that will be considered on the exposure draft of this project, analyzing the comment letters submitted by the members of ASAF and the Big4 as well. The study reveals the increasing importance the preparers and users give to the disclosures included on the notes to the primary financial statements. Moreover, on this study we emphasize several challenges that IASB has to face on issuing the exposure draft for this important project. Some of the main challenges refer to the narrow scope of the financial statements, the criteria used on classification, aggregation and offsetting, or the use of the materiality concept


  • 1. Armstrong C.S., Guay W.R., Weber J.P. (2010), The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting, Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 50, issue 2-3;

  • 2. Baker C.R. & Barbu E.M. (2009), Trends in research on international accounting harmonization, Accounting Theory, vol. 4;

  • 3. Barth M.E. (2007), Research, Standard Setting, and Global Financial Reporting, Foundations and Trends in Accounting, vol. 1, issue 2;

  • 4. Burlaud A. (2013), Should Financial Statements Represent Fairly or be Relevant? Considering the IASC/IASB Conceptual Framework, working paper;

  • 5. Capkun V., Hammeri A., Weiss L. (2009), Does Adoption of IAS/IFRS Deter Earnings Management, available on;

  • 6. Christensen H.B., Lee E., Walker M., Zeng C. (2014), Incentives or Standards: What Determines Accounting Quality Changes around IFRS Adoption?, European Accounting Review, vol. 24, issue 1;

  • 7. Christensen J. (2010), Conceptual framework of accounting from an information perspective, Accounting and Business Research, vol. 40, issue 3;

  • 8. EFRAG (2012), Towards a Disclosure Framework for the Notes to the financial statements, available on;

  • 9. EFRAG (2014), Getting a Better Framework. Complexity Bulletin, available on;

  • 10. ESMA (2013), Feedback Statement. Considerations of materiality in financial reporting, available on;

  • 11. FASB (2014), Memorandum. Conceptual Framework-Presentation, available on;

  • 12. Gebhardt G., Mora A., Wagenhofer A. (2014), Revisiting the Fundamental Concepts of IFRS, Abacus, vol. 50, issue 1;

  • 13. Hirshleifer D. & Teoh S.H. (2003), Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting, Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 36;

  • 14. IASB (2004), Conceptual framework proposal, available on;

  • 15. IASB (2010), IFRS Practice Statement Management Commentary. A framework for presentation, available on;

  • 16. IASB (2013), Discussion Forum-Financial Reporting Disclosure Feedback Statement, available on;

  • 17. IASB (2014), Conceptual Framework: High level overview of feedback on the Discussion Paper, available on;

  • 18. IASB (2015), Effect of Board redeliberations on DP A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, available on;

  • 19. IIRC (2013), The International Integrated Reporting Framework, available on;

  • 20. Jayaraman S. & Verdi R.S. (2013), The Effect of Economic Integration on Accounting Comparability: Evidence from the Adoption of the Euro, working paper, available on;

  • 21. Jorissen A., Lybaert N., Orens R., van der Tas L. (2014), Constituents’ Participation in the IASC/ IASB’s due Process of International Accounting Standard Setting: A Longitudinal Analysis, chapter included on Accounting and Regulation. New Insights on Governance, Markets and Institutions, Springer, New York;

  • 22. KPMG (2013), The future of corporate reporting: towards a common vision, available on;

  • 23. Le Manh A. & Ramond O. (2011), Determining a Consistent set of Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards. A research note based on the IASB-FASB Conceptual Framework revision project, working paper presented to the 32th Congres of AFC, Montpellier, France;

  • 24. Nobes C. & Parker R. (2008), Comparative International Accounting, Prentice Hall, Edinburg;

  • 25. Nobes C.W. & Stadler C. (2014), The qualitative characteristics of financial information and managers’ accounting decisions: evidence from IFRS policy changes, working paper presented to IFRS Research Forum 2014, held on 2 October 2014;

  • 26. Ohlson J.A., Penman S., Bloomfield R., Christensen T.E., Colson R., Jamal K., Moehrle S., Previts G., Stober T., Sunder S., Watts R.L. (2010), A Framework for Financial Reporting Standards: Issues and Suggested Model, Accounting Horizons, vol. 24, issue 3;

  • 27. Pompian M.M. (2006), Behavioral Finance and Wealth Management. How to build Optimal Portfolios that Account for Investors Biases, Wiley New Jersey;

  • 28. Ramanna K. & Sletten E. (2014), Network Effects in Countries’ Adoption of IFRS, Accounting Review, vol. 89, issue 4;

  • 29. Stephen A. Zeff (2012), The Evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the Challenges it Faces, The Accounting Review, vol. 87, issue 3.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 20 20 20
PDF Downloads 4 4 4