The future of sustainable development is the bioeconomy with the ―global‖ solution; both global and local action for developed the renewable energy generation. When local solutions are implemented is being laid for global solutions are positive affect the national economy. The implementation of the bioeconomy strategy used by society to prevent urgent problems, such as increasing competition for natural resources, climate change, rural sustainable development. The bioeconomy is a new economic and social order and promotes systemic change from using non-renewable resources to renewables. Bioeconomy reveals that production, which involves the transformation of a limited stock of matter and energy, but respecting the same laws that govern entropy closed systems, the entropy or unavailable matter and energy in the forms tend to increase continuously. Economic growth not only increases the apparent output per unit of inputs, which is performed using finite stock of matter and energy in the world. The current economy is based on fossil fuels and other material inputs suffering entropic degradation, both in the raw material extraction and pollution. The production, even if technical progress leads to lower overall yields. The idea of a steady state as the final economic growth that perpetuated indefinitely pendulum model is an impossibility
1. AT Bogdan, Ipate Iudith, Ecoeconomy and ecosanogenesis in Romania based of agrifood green power, Romanian Academy Editor 2012, ISBN 978-973-27-2264-0, 2012.
2. Braat, LC & WFJ van Lierop, Integrated economic-ecological modeling, Elsevier Science Pub. Co., Amsterdam; New York 1987.
3. Brookshire, DS, LA Brand, J Thacher, MD Dixon, K Benedict, JC Stromberg, K Lansey, D Goodrich, M McIntosh, J Grandy, S Stewart, C Broadbent & G Izon, Integrated modeling and ecological valuation: Applications in the semiarid southwest, paper presented at Workshop "Valuation for Environmental Policy: Ecological Benefits", Washington DC, April 23-24, 2007, 2007.
4. Cai, X, DC McKinney & L Lasdon, An integrated hydrologic-agronomiceconomic model for river basin management, J Water Resour Plan Manage, 129(1), 4-17, 2003.
5. Eggert, H, Bioeconomic analysis and management, Environ Resour Econ, 11(3), 399-411, 1998.
6. Ewert, F, MK van Ittersum, I Bezlepkina, O Therond, E Andersen, H Belhouchette, C Bockstaller, F Brouwer, T Heckelei, S Janssen, R Knapen, M Kuiper, K Louhichi, JA Olsson, N Turpin, J Wery, JE Wien & J Wolf, A methodology for enhanced flexibility of integrated assessment in agriculture, Environ Sci Policy, 12(5), 546-561, 2009.
7. Firth, C, The use of gross and net margins in the economic analysis of organic farms, paper presented at UK Organic Research 2002: Proceedings of the COR Conference, Aberystwyth, 26-28th March 2002, 26-28th March 2002, 2001.
8. Gonzalez-Alvarez, Y, AG Keeler & JD Mullen, Farm-level irrigation and the marginal cost of water use: Evidence from Georgia, J Environ Manag, 80(4), 311-317, 2006.
9. Grigalunas, T, JJ Opaluch & M Luo, The economic costs to fisheries from marine sediment disposal: Case study of providence, USA, Ecol Econ, 38(1), 47-58, 2001.
10. Hanley, N & EB Barbier, Pricing nature. Cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2009.
11. Hazell, PBR & RD Norton, Mathematical programming for economic analysis in agriculture, Macmillan, 1986.
12. Jula D., Jula N., 2010, Modelare economica. Modelele econometrice si de optimizare. Mustang, Bucuresti
13. OECD, The Political Economy of Environmentally Related Taxes, 2006, Paris, pp. 10 - 25