Phantasmic Devices: Wedding Videos and the Creation of an Imagined Transnational Community by Bulgarian Muslims in Spain

Open access


For the Bulgarian Muslims in Spain wedding videos are a popular device for socializing, overcoming nostalgia and keeping pace with the news and events that take place back home in Bulgaria. The mediatization of the ritual allows an extension of the ritual across time and space. Watching the videos is a re-enactment of the celebration and has become part of the ritual itself. Subsequently, this extension of the ritual through a mediated device has led to its subtle transformations. At the same time, wedding videos and the particular mode of use produce a social effect beyond the structure of the ritual. They contribute to the extending and re-creating of a migrant community that spreads over space transnationally and temporally between the past of home and the present of life in migrancy. Drawing on ethnographic material and using the analytical tools of actor-network theory, the main aim of this paper is to trace the uses and effects of wedding videos for transforming the wedding ritual through postponing and re-enacting it on one hand, and for sustaining the phantasm of an imagined virtual community on the other. The broader problem that this paper seeks to address is the specific role that material devices play for producing social effects for migrant communities.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abu-Lughod L. (2002). Egyptian Melodrama - Technology of the Modern Subject? in F. D. Ginsburg L. Abu-Lughod B. Larkin (Eds.) Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. pp. 115–33.

  • Akrich M. Pasveer B. (2004). Embodiment and Disembodiment in Childbirth Narratives. Body & Society 10(2–3):63–84.

  • Aksoy A. Robins K. (2000). Thinking across Spaces: Transnational Television from Turkey. European Journal of Cultural Studies 3(3):343-465.

  • Asch T. Cardozo J.I. Cabellero H. Bortoli. J. (1991). The Story We Now Want to Hear Is Not Ours to Tell: Relinquishing Control Over Representation: Toward Sharing Visual Communication Skills with The Yanomami. Visual Anthropology Review 7(2):102–6.

  • Aufderheide P. (1995). The Video in the Villages Project: Videomaking with and by Brazilian Indians. Visual Anthropology Review 11(2):83–93.

  • Banks M. (2001). Visual Methods in Social Research. London: SAGE.

  • Banks M. Morphy H. (1997). Introduction: Rethinking Visual Anthropology. In M. Banks and H. Morphy (Eds.) Rethinking Visual Anthropology. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Bourdieu P. (1990). Photography: A Middle-Brow Art. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Caglar A. (2001). Medien Werbeindustrie und Kosmopolitentum. Ethnoscripts 1:25–38.

  • Callon M. Millo Y. Muniesa F. eds. (2007). Market Devices. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.

  • Callon M. Latour B. (1981). Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-Structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So. In K. Knorr and A. Cicourel (Eds.) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul pp. 277–303.

  • Carelli V. (1988). Video in the Villages. Commission on Visual Anthropology Bulletin 10–15.

  • Cunningam S. Sinclair J. eds. (2000). Floating Lives: The Media and Asian Diasporas. St. Lucia Queensland: University of Queensland Press.

  • Deneva N. (2012). Transnational Aging Carers: On Transformation of Kinship and Citizenship in the Context of Migration among Bulgarian Muslims in Spain. Social Politics 19(1):105–128.

  • Depeli G. (2009). Migrant Memories: German-Turkish Marriage Ceremonies in Berlin. Ethnologia Baikanica 13:231–248.

  • Dornfeld B. (2002). Putting American Public Television in Its Place. In F. D. Ginsburg L. Abu-Lughod B. Larkin (Eds.) Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. pp. 247–63

  • Faraday G. (2000). Revolt of the Filmmakers: The Struggle for Artistic Autonomy and the Fail of the Soviet Film Industry. State College: Pennsylvania State University Press.

  • Fedyuk O. (2012). Images of Transnational Motherhood: The Role of Photographs in Measuring Time and Maintaining Connections between Ukraine and Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38(2):279–300.

  • Gell A. (1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Gillespie M. (1995). Television Ethnicity and Cultural Change. London: Routledge.

  • Ginsburg F. (1997). From Little Things Big Things Grow: Indigenous Media and Cultural Activism. In R. Fox and O. Starn. (Eds.) Between Resistance and Revolution: Cultural Politics and Social Protest New Brunswick N.J.:Rutgers University Press pp. 118–44.

  • Ginsburg F. D. Abu-Lughod L. Larkin B. eds. (2002). Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Gomart E. Hennion A. (1999). A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs Drug Users. The Sociological Review 47(1):220–247.

  • Gore C. (1997). Ritual Performance and Media in Urban Contemporary Shrine Configurations in Benin City Nigeria. In F. Hughes-Freeland eds. Ritual Performance Media London and New York: Routledge. pp. 66–84.

  • Grimshaw A. (2001). The Ethnographer’s Eye: Ways of Seeing in Anthropology. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hamilton A. (2002). The National Picture: Thai Media and Cultural Identity. In F. D. Ginsburg L. Abu-Lughod B. Larkin (Eds.) Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. pp. 152–70

  • Howcroft D. Mitev N. Wilson M. (2004). “What We May Learn from the Social Shaping of Technology Approach.” Pp. 329–371 in Social theory and philosophy for information systems.

  • Himpele J. D. (2002). Complicity and Media Ethnography in the Bolivian Public Sphere. In F. D. Ginsburg L. Abu-Lughod B. Larkin (Eds.) Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. pp. 301–319

  • Hirsch M. (1997). Family Frames: Photography Narrative and Postmemory. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.

  • Hui A. (2015). Networks of Home Travel and Use during Hong Kong Return Migration: Thinking Topologically about the Spaces of Human-Material Practices. Global Networks 15(4):536–52.

  • Karim K. H. (1998). From Ethnic Media to Global Media: Transnational Communication Networks among Diasporic Communities WPTC-99-02. University of Oxford. Transnational Communities Programme.

  • Kosnick K. (2000). Building Bridges: Media for Migrants and the Public-Service Mission in Germany. European Journal of Cultural Studies 3(3):319–42.

  • Kuhn A. (2002). Family Secrets: Acts of Memory and Imagination. London and New York: Verso.

  • Latour B. (2007). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Law J. (1992). Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering Strategy and Heterogeneity. Systems Practice 5(4):379–393.

  • Law J. (2009). Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. In B. Turner (Ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. New Jersey NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 141–58

  • Lowenthal D. (1985). The Past Is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • MacDougall D. (1998). Transcultural Cinema. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • MacKenzie Donald and Judy Wajcman. 1999. The Social Shaping of Technology. Open University Press.

  • Marcus G. E. ed. (1997). Cultural Producers in Perilous States: Editing Events Documenting Change. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • McLagan M. (2002). Spectacles of Difference: Cultural Activism and the Mass Mediation of Tibet. In F. D. Ginsburg L. Abu-Lughod B. Larkin (Eds.) Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. pp. 90–111

  • Mol A. (2010). Actor-Network Theory: Sensitive Terms and Enduring Tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft 50:253–269.

  • Mol A. Berg M. (1994). Principles and Practices of Medicine. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry 18(2):247–265.

  • Moore S. F. Myerhoff B. G. (1977). Secular Ritual: Forms and Meanings. In S. F. Moore B. G. Myerhoff (Eds.) Secular Ritual Assen: Van Gorcum. Pp. 3–24.

  • Navaro-Yashin Y. (2007). Make-Believe Papers Legal Forms and the Counterfeit: Affective Interactions between Documents and People in Britain and Cyprus. Anthropological Theory 7(1):79–98.

  • Neuburger M. (2000). Veils Shalvari and Matters of Dress: Unravelling the Fabric of Women’s Lives in Communist Bulgaria’. In S. E. Reid and D. Crowley (Eds.) Style and Socialism: Modernity and Material Culture in Post-War Eastern Europe. Oxford: Berg. Pp. 169–188.

  • Philipsen H. H. Markussen B. (Eds.) (1995). Advocacy and Indigenous Film-Making. Walnut Creek CA: Left Coast Press.

  • Pink S. (1998). From Ritual Sacrifice to Media Commodity. Anthropological and Media Constructions of the Spanish Bullfight and the Rise of Women Performers. In F. Hughes-Freeland (Ed.) Ritual Performance Media London and New York: Routledge. Pp. 121–40.

  • Pink S. (2001). Doing Visual Ethnography: Images Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage Publications.

  • Prins H.E.L. (1997). The Paradox of Primitivism: Native Rights and the Problem of Imagery in Cultural Survival Films. Visual Anthropology Quarterly 9(304):243–66.

  • Ruby J. (1991). Speaking For Speaking About Speaking With or Speaking Alongside-An Anthropological and Documentary Dilemma. Visual Anthropology Review 7(2):50–67.

  • Sánchez-Querubín N. Rogers R. (2018). Connected Routes: Migration Studies with Digital Devices and Platforms. Social Media + Society 4(1):2056305118764427.

  • Sreberny-Mohammadi A. Mohammadi A. (1994). Small Media Big Revolution: Communication Culture and the Iranian Revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Strathern M. (1999) Property Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London and New Brunswick NJ: The Athlone Press.

  • Suchman L. Blomberg J. Orr J.E. Trigg R. (1999). Reconstructing Technologies as Social Practice. American Behavioral Scientist 43(3):392–408.

  • Todorova M. (1998). Identity (Trans) Formation among Bulgarian Muslims. C. Beverly and R. D. Lipschutz (Eds.) The Myth of ‘Ethnic Conflict’: Politics Economics and ‘cultural’ violence Berkeley: University of California Research Series 98.

  • Turner T. (1992). Defiant Images: The Kayapo Appropriation of Video. Anthropology Today 8(6):5–16.

  • Turner V. W. (1969). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Ithaca N.Y: Cornell University Press.

  • Vertovec S. (2000). Fostering Cosmopolitanisms: A Conceptual Survey and a Media Experiment in Berlin WPTC-2K-06. Working Paper. Oxford UK: Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology.

  • Weatherford E. (1990). Native Visions: The Growth of Indigenous Media. Aperture 1(119):58.

  • Wolbert B. (2001). The Visual Production of Locality: Turkish Family Pictures Migration and the Creation of Virtual Neighborhood. Visual Anthropology Review 17(1):21–35.

  • Wolbert B. (2008). Ein Fest Fuer Die Kamera: Hochzeitvideos and Virtuelle Nachbarschaften. In W. Weick A. Wieczoreck G. Framke and P. Hesse-Mohr (Eds.) Evet - Ja Ich Will. Hochzeitkultur und Mode von 1800 bis heute: eine deutsch-turkische Begegnung. Vol. Band 33. Mannheim Germany: Reiss-Eingelhorn Museen.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.100
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.000

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 77 77 12
PDF Downloads 61 61 9