The Dimension of Normativity in Informal Social Relations

Open access

Abstract

The aim of this article is to discuss the character of regularities occurring in informal social bonds, be they friendships, romantic partnerships, competitions or rivalries. Since Simmel’s work is emblematic for the theme of social norms involved in durable informal bonds, I take his original concept of forms of association as my point of reference. The argument I propose challenges several of Simmel’s assumptions, namely his objectivist stance, his formal sociology and the autopoiesis of systems of reciprocal effects. Based on this critical rereading of Simmel, I introduce the concept of “socially constructed typical bonds” as a more dynamic and versatile alternative to the static patterns of forms of association. By bringing a subjectivist turn (inspired by Berger, Luckmann and Butler) to Simmel’s forms of association, I argue for the recognition of the blurry, diverse and contradictory understandings of the typical social bond as the ground for relational normativity.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Berger L. Peter and Luckmann Thomas (1966). The Social Construction of Reality Anchor Books.

  • Blatterer Harry (2013). ‘Friendship’s Freedom and Gendered Limits’ European Journal of Social Theory 16 (4) pp. 435-456.

  • Blegvad Mogens (1989). ‘A Simmel Renaissance’ [Review of the book Soziologie und Erkenntnistheorie bei Georg Simmel by Horst Jürgen Helle]. Acta Sociologica 32 (2) pp. 203-209.

  • Blumer Herbert (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method Englewood Cliffs N. J.: Prentice-Hall.

  • Butler Judith (1997). Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York and London: Routledge.

  • Cantó-Milà Natàlia (2005). A Sociological Theory of Value. Georg Simmel's Sociological Relationism. Transcript-Verlag.

  • Fitzi Gregor (2002). ‘Comment la société est-elle possible? Développement et signification du ‘paradigme épistémologique’ de la Sociologie de Simmel de 1908’ in L. Deroche-Gurcel und P. Watier (Hg.) La Sociologie de Simmel (1908). Éléments actuels de modélisation sociale PUF Paris.

  • Frisby David (1992). Simmel and Since. Essays on Georg Simmel’s Social Theory. London and New York: Routledge.

  • Fuchs Stephan (1988). ‘The Constitution of Emergent Interaction Orders: A Comment on Rawls’ Sociological Theory 6(1) pp. 122-124.

  • Garfinkel Harold (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

  • Gilbert Eric and Karahalios Karrie (2009). ‘Predicting Tie Strenght With Social Media’ CHI '09 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems pp. 211-220.

  • Goffman Erving (1959). The presentation of the self in everyday life (2nd Ed.). New York NY: Anchor Books.

  • Goffman Erving (1961) Encounters. Indianapolis Indiana: Bobbs Merrill.

  • Goffman Ervin (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Anchor Books.

  • Goffman Erving (1983). ‘Presidential Address: The Interaction Order’ American Sociological Review 48 pp. 1-17.

  • Granovetter S. Mark (1973). ‘The Streght of Weak Ties’ American Journal of Sociology 78 (6) pp. 1360-1380.

  • Grabowicz A. Przemyslaw Ramasco J. José Moro Esteban Pujol M. Josep Eguiluz M. Victor (2012). ‘Social Features of Online Networks: The Strenght of Intermediary Ties in Online Social Media’ PLoS ONE 7 (1) pp. 1-10.

  • Habermas Jürgen (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2. Boston: Beacon.

  • Habermas Jürgen (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Hochschild Arlie Russell (1979). ‘Emotion Work Feeling Rules and Social Structure’ American Journal of Sociology 85 (3) pp. 551-575.

  • Hochschild Arlie Russell (1983). The Managed Heart. Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berlekey: University of California Press.

  • Levine Donald N. Ellwood B. Carter and Eleanor Miller Gorman (1976). ‘Simmel’s Influence on American Sociology I’ American Journal of Sociology 81 (4) pp. 813-845.

  • Levine Donald N. (1981). ‘Sociology's Quest for the Classics: The Case of Simmel’ pp. 60-80 in The Future of the Sociological Classics edited by Buford Rhea. London: Allen & Unwin.

  • Levine Donald N. (1991). ‘Simmel and Parsons Reconsidered’ American Journal of Sociology 96 (5) pp. 1097-1116.

  • Luhmann Niklas (1995). Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Marsden V. Peter and Campbell E. Karen (1984). ‘Measuring Tie Strenght’ Social Forces 63 (2) pp. 482-501.

  • Parsons Talcott (1966) [1937]. The Structure of Social Action. A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers New York: The Free Press and London: Collier - Macmillan Ltd.

  • Poli Roberto (2010). ‘The Complexity of Self-reference. A Critical Evaluation of Luhmann’s Theory of Social Systems’ Journal of Sociocybernetics 8 (1) pp. 1-23.

  • Pyyhtinen Olli (2010). Simmel and ‘The Social’. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Rawls Anne Warfield (1987). ‘The Interaction Order Sui Genesis: Goffman’s Contribution to Social Theory’ Sociological Theory 5 (2) pp.136-149.

  • Rawls Anne Warfield (1988). ‘Interaction vs. Interaction Order: Reply to Fuchs’ Sociological Theory 6 (1) pp. 124-129.

  • Rawls Anne Warfield (1989). ‘Simmel Parsons and the Interaction Order’ Sociological Theory 7 (1) pp. 124-129.

  • Schütz Alfred (1967). Phenomenology of the Social Word. Evanston Illinois: Northwestern University Press.

  • Simmel. Georg (2009) [1908]. Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms. Vol. I and Vol. II. Anthony J. Blasi Anton K. Jacobs and Mathew Kanjirathinkal (Eds.& Trans.) Boston: Brill.

  • Simmel Georg (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Kurt H. Wolff (Ed.& Trans.) The Free Press.

  • Simmel Georg (1971). On Individuality and Social Forms. Donald N. Levine (Ed.). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press The Heritage of Sociology Series.

  • Strydom Piet (2001). ‘The Problem of Triple Contingency in Habermas’ Sociological Theory 19 (2) pp. 165-86.

  • Vanderstraeten Raf (2002). ‘Parsons Luhmann and The Theorem of Double Contingency’ in Journal of Classical Sociology 2 (1) pp. 77-92.

  • Wolff Kurt Heinrich (1950). Introduction. In Kurt Wolff (Ed.&Trans.) The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Free Press.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.100
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.000

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 255 99 2
PDF Downloads 141 63 1