The Higher Essence of Economic Convergence Regarding Monetary Impacts

Open access

Abstract

The increasing pace of achieving socio-economic growth and convergence into developed structures represents the main desire of most countries. Moreover, membership in monetary unions has quite a significant impact on the economies of participating countries, since integration processes have become undoubtedly the undisputed accelerator of convergence and integration catalyst, reflecting on the development of the world economy. The growing intensity of world trade, the ever-deepening division of labor and specialization, international movement of capital and labor mobility as wells as investments into education, research and development, innovations are among the factors that lead to the creation of increasingly closer ties between economies, deepening their mutual dependence, further reflected in knowledge-based societies. Thus, the close ties between national economies themselves represent a further incentive for more intensive cooperation through the different stages of economic integration. International economic integration is an objective to promote a gradual process of linking and connecting existing economic units, i.e. national economies to the greater interconnected units in the global economy. The aim of our research paper, by using the methods of analysis and comparison, is to closely present the issue of monetary integration, focusing on the impact of monetary integration on countries’ economy, resulting in the issue of benefits and costs of the countries’ entry into the monetary union, associated with initial economic shocks.

Baldwin, R. E., & Wyplosz, Ch. (2012). The Economics of European Integration. New York: McGraw Hill Higher Education.

De Grauwe, P. (2017). The Limits of the Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Grauwe, P. (2016). Economics of Monetary Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Grauwe, P. (2014). Economics of Monetary Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fleming, J. M. (1971). On Exchange Rate Unification. Economic Journal, 81 (323), 467-488.

Frankel, J., & Rose, A. (1998). The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria. Economic Journal, 108 (449), 1009-1025.

Hudec, M. (2017). Monetary Impacts of Accelerated Economic Convergence. Bratislava: Publishing house EKONÓM.

Kenen, P. B. (1969). The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View. In R.A. Mundell and A.K. Swoboda (Eds.), Monetary Problems of the International Economics. (pp. 41-60). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Krugman, P. R. (1993). Lessons of Massachusetts for EMU. In: F. Torres, F. Giavazzi (Eds.), Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union. (pp. 241-269). Oxford: Cambridge University Press.

Lacina, L. (2007). Měnová integrace: Náklady a přínosy členství v měnové unii. Praha: C. H. Beck.

Meade, E. E., & Kenen, P. B. (2007). Regional Monetary Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McKinnon, R. I. (1963). Optimum Currency Areas. The American Economic Review, 53 (4), 717-725.

Mongelli, F. P. (2008). European Economic and Monetary Integration, and the Optimum Currency Area Theory. Brussels: European Commission.

Mundell, R. A. (1961). A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. The American Economic Review, Vol. 51(4), 657-665.

Spanjers, W. (2009). Monetary Policy, Trade and Convergence: The Case of Transition Economies. Berlin: LIT Verlag.

United Nations (2011). Definition and Types of Shocks and Coping Strategies to be Monitored. In: Monitoring Household Coping Strategies during Complex Crises, 30.

Studia Commercialia Bratislavensia

The Journal of University of Economics in Bratislava

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 210 170 11
PDF Downloads 115 111 17