Rhetorical Evaluation of Seventeenth Century Prefaces to English Treatises on Midwifery
This study tries to offer a rhetorical account of the main arguments and figures encountered in 17th c. English prefaces, dealing with the art of midwifery and the delivery of children. I foreground a main causal argument wherein the author states the necessity for a treatise of this delicate nature and proposes the motives for its requirement. In doing so, some other reasonings support the causation and provide the reader with more evidence for a good performance at childbirth. In addition, the arguments are enhanced by the presence of some figures of communion that contribute to the rhetorical organisation, and help to portray the prologue as an expository discourse. The insistence on complying with the author's directions, and the urge not to follow some predecessors' work also suggests the new authority that the early modern English preface writer is acquiring.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Barret Robert 1699 A companion for midwives child-bearing women and nurses.
Chamberlain Peter 1665 Midwifes practice: Or a guide for women in that high concern of conception breeding and nursing children.
Culpeper Nich 1651 A directory for midwives: Or a guide for women in their conception bearing and suckling their children.
Rueff James 1637 The expert midwife or an excellent and most necessary treatise of the generation and birth of man.
Sermon William 1671 The ladies companion or the English midwife.
T. C. - I. D. - M. S. - T. B. 1656 The complete midwives practice the most weighty and high concernments of the birth of man.
Wolveridge James 1669 Speculum matricis hybernicum: Or the Irish midwives handmaid.
Britton Bruce K. - John B. Black (eds.) 1985 Understanding expository text. A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing expository text. Parts 1 and 2. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dunn Kevin 1994 Pretexts of authority: The rhetoric of authorship in the renaissance preface. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Evans Ruth 1999 "An afterword on the prologue" in: Jocelyn Wogan-Browne - Nicholas Watson - Andrew Taylor - Ruth Evans (eds.) 371-378.
Graff Richard - Wendy Winn 2006 "Presenting ‘communion’ in Chaïm Perelman's New rhetoric" Philosophy and Rhetoric 39/1: 45-71.
Harris Randy 2008 "Cognitive dimensions of the universal audience" available at http://www.arts.uwaterloo.ca/~raha/
Jost Walter - Michael J. Hyde (eds.) 1997 Rhetoric and hermeneutics in our time: A reader. New Haven - London: Yale University Press.
Liu Yameng 1997 "Authority presumption and invention" Philosophy and Rhetoric 30/4: 413-427.
Martínez-Dueñas Espejo José Luis 2002 Retórica de la lengua inglesa. Granada: Comares.
Meyer Bonnie J. F. 1985a "Prose analysis: Purposes procedures and problems" in: Bruce K. Britton - John B. Black (eds.) 11-64.
Meyer Bonnie J. F. 1985b "Prose analysis: Purposes procedures and problems" in: Bruce K. Britton - John B. Black (eds.) 269-304.
Olmsted Wendy 1997 "The uses of rhetoric: Indeterminacy in legal reasoning practical thinking and the interpretation of literary figures" in: Walter Jost - Michael J. Hyde (eds.) 235-253.
Perelman Chaim - Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca 1969 The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. (Translated by John Wilkinson - Purcell Weaver.) Notre Dame Indiana: University of Notre Dame.
Plantin Christian 2009 "A place for figures of speech in argumentation theory" Argumentation 23/3: 325-337.
Walton Douglas 2005 "Justification of argumentation schemes" Australasian Journal of Logic 3: 1-13.
Wogan-Browne Jocelyn - Nicholas Watson - Andrew Taylor - Ruth Evans (eds.) 1999 The idea of the vernacular. An anthology of Middle English literary theory 1280-1520. Reed Hall: University of Exeter Press.
Wright Larry 2002 "Reasoning and explaining" Argumentation 16/1: 33-46.