Impact of land use and geological conditions on selected physical soil properties in relation to the earthworm abundance and biomass along an altitudinal gradient in Slovakia

Open access

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyse the impact of land use and altitudinal gradient including geological conditions on selected soil physical properties with subsequent effect on earthworms as important soil organisms. The research was conducted at three study sites (Očová – OC, Tajov – TA, Liptovská Teplička – LT) situated in the different climatic and natural conditions of Slovakia each with 3 plots differing in land use (arable land - AL, permanent grasslands – PG, forest land – FL). During 2014 over two periods, we measured soil penetration resistance (PR) with total depth of the measurement (DP) and soil moisture (SM). Earthworms were hand sorted counted and weighed. We found out high variability of measured parameters conditioned by time, space (altitudinal gradient) and land use. PR values of all measurements ranged from 0.19 to 5.00 MPa, DP values from 0.02 to 0.80 m and soil moisture from 2 to 50%. Paired samples test confirmed differences between different land use types mainly between AL and FL plots. There were confirmed significant differences between three ecological gradients in all observed properties with one exception. Correlations among observed variables under different altitudinal gradients and land use types were found. The earthworm density and biomass was significantly higher in permanent grasslands compared to forest and arable land. In arable land, the earthworm density and biomass negatively correlated with the penetration resistance and positively with the depth of the total measurements. In permanent grasslands earthworm biomass positively correlated with soil moisture.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bojko O. Kabala C. 2016. Transformation of physicochemical soil properties along a mountain slope due to land management and climate changes – A case study from the Karkonosze Mountains SW Poland. Catena 140: 43–54.

  • Bucala A. Budek A. Maciej K. 2015. The impact of land use and land cover changes on soil properties and plant communities in the Gorce Mountains (Western Polish Carpathians) during the past 50 years. Zeitschrift für Geomorhologie 59: 41–74.

  • Bucala-Hrabia A. 2017. Long-term impact of socio-economic changes on agricultural land use in the Polish Carpathians. Land Use Policy 64: 391–404.

  • Chen H. Shao M. Li Y. 2008. Soil desiccation in the Loess Plateau of China. Geoderma 143: 91–100.

  • Dupouey J.L. Dambrine E. Laffite J.D. Moares C. 2002. Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology 83: 2987–2984.

  • European Environment Agency 2010. The European environment – state and outolk 2010: synthesis. Copenhagen EEA: 212 pp.

  • Ernst G. Emmerling C. 2009. Impact of five differents tillage systems on soil organic carbon content and the density biomass and community composition of earthworms after a ten year period. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 45: 247–251.

  • Gomez A. Powers R.F. Singer M.J. Horwath R. 2001. Soil compaction effects on growth of young ponderosa pine following litter removal in California's Sierra Nevada. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66(4): 1334–1343.

  • Hettiaratchi D.R.P. 1987. A critical state sil mechanics model for agricultural soils. Si Use Management 3: 94–105.

  • Houšková B. Montanarella L. 2008. The natural susceptiblity of European soils to compaction. [In:] Threats to soil quality in Europe (Tóth G. Montanarella L. Rusco E. Editors). EC JRC IES Ispra: 23–33.

  • Jones A. Spoor G. Thomson A. 2003. Vulnerability of subsoil in Europe to compaction: a preliminary analysis. Soil Till Res 73: 131–143.

  • Kanianska R. Kizeková M. Nováček M. Zeman M. 2014. Landuse and land-cover changes in rural areas during different political systems: A case study of Slovakia from 1782 to 2006. Land Use Policy 36: 554–566.

  • Kobza J. 2014. Permanent soil monitoring system as a basic tool for protectin of soils and sustainable land use in Slovakia. IOP Conf. Sereis: Earth and Environmental Science 25: 1–10.

  • Laossi K.R. Decens T. Jouquet P. Barot S. 2010. Can we predict how earthworm effect on plant growth vary with soil properties? Applied and Environmental Soil Science 2010: 1–6.

  • Ministry of Environment of the Slovak republic 2002. Landscape atlas of the Slovak republic. ISBN 80-88833-27-2.

  • Mueller L. Schindelr U. Mirshcel W. et al. 2010. Assessing the productivity function of soils. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 30: 601–614.

  • Nawaz M.F. Bourrié G. Trolard F. 2013. Soil compaction impact and modelling. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 33: 291–309.

  • Perreault J.M. Whalen J.K. 2006. Earthworm burrowing in laboratory microcosmos as influenced by soil temperature and moisture. Pedobiologia 50: 397–403.

  • Plieninger T. Bieling C. 2012. Connecting cultural landscapes to resilience. [In:] Resilience and the cultural landscape. Understanding and managing change in human-shaped environments (Plieninger T. Bieling C. Editors). Cambridge University Press Cambridge: 3–26.

  • Smith R. McSwiney C. Grandy A. Suwanwaree P. Snider R. Roberson G. 2008. Diversity and abundance of earthworms acros an agricultural land-use intensity gradient. Soil Tillage Research 100: 208–2019.

  • Taguas E.V. Arroyo C. Lora A. Guzmán G. Vanderlinden K. Gómez J.A. 2015. Exploring the linkage between spontaneous grass cover biodiversity and soil degradation in two olive orchard micro-catchments with contrasting environmental and management conditions. The Soil 1: 651–664.

  • Tian G. Olimah J.A. Adeoye G.O. Kang B.T. 2000. Regeneration of earthworm population in a degraded soil by natural and planted fallows udner humic tropical conditions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64: 222–228.

  • Trabaquini K. Formaggio A.R. Galvao L.S. 2015. Changes in physical properties of soils with land use time in the Brazilian savanna environment. Land Degradation & Development 26: 397–408.

  • Vivoni E.R. Rinehart A.J. Méndez-Barroso L.A. et al. 2008. Vegetation controls on soil moisture distribution in the Valles Caldera New Mexico during the North American Monsoon. Ecohydrology 1: 225–238.

  • Vliet J. de Groot H.L.F. Rietveld P. Verburg P.H. 2015. Manifestations and underlying drivers of agricultural land use change in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 133: 24–36.

  • Vogel H.J. Bartke S. Daedlow K. et al. 2017. Sustainable soil management requires a systematic approach. SOIL Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2017-26 in review 2017.

  • Zhao X. Wu P. Gao X. Persaud N. 2015. Soil quality indicators in relation to land use and topography in a small catchment on the Loess plateau of China. Land Degradation & Development 26: 54–61.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 1.08

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.427
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.586

Index Copernicus Value (ICV) 2018: 114.45 pkt

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 212 197 19
PDF Downloads 174 163 26