Enzymatic Activity and Enchytraeids Abundance in Agricultural Mountain Soils / Aktywność enzymatyczna i liczebność wazonkowców w glebach górskich użytkowanych rolniczo


The number of soil mesofauna and enzymatic activity of soils are good indicators of changes in soil influenced by cultivation. The aim of this study was to compare density of enchytraeids and the activity of dehydrogenases (ADh), urease (AU), and invertase (AI) in the soils of grassland and arable land. Relationships that exist between those biological parameters and the basic soil properties (the content of total organic carbon (TOC) and nitrogen (TN), pH, texture, and total porosity) were defined. In the research, soil material from humus horizon of 12 soils which were located in the Mały Beskid and Silesian Foothills (S Poland) was used. The main density of enchytraeids in grassland soils (12 982 ind⋅m-2) was twice higher than in arable land soils (6099 ind⋅m-2), and the differences were statistically significant. Grassland soils were characterised by higher enzymatic activity than arable land soils. However, only ADh, which were almost three times higher in grassland than in arable soils (2024 and 742 μmol TPFkg-1h-1, respectively), showed significant differences. In grassland soils more favourable edaphic conditions for the development of soil organisms occurred in comparison with arable land.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Adl S.M., 2008. Enchytraeids. [In:] Soil sampling and methods of analysis 2nd edn. (Carter M.R., Gregorich E.G., Eds.). Canadian Society of Soil Science, Inc.

  • Alef K., Nannipieri P., 1995. Microbial biomass. [In:] Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry (Alef K., Nannipieri P., Eds.). London, Academic Press: 362-363.

  • Bandick A.K., Dick, R.P., 1999. Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 31: 1471-1479.

  • Beylich A., Graefe U., 2009. Investigations of annelids at soil monitoring sites in Northern Germany: reference ranges and time-series data Soil Organisms 81, 2: 175-196

  • Casida L.E.J., Klein D.A., Santoro T., 1964. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science 98: 371-376.

  • Ciarkowska K., Sołek-Podwika K., Wieczorek J., 2014. Enzyme activity as an indicator of soil-rehabilitation processes at a zinc and lead ore mining and processing area. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 62: 266-277.

  • Frankenberger W.T., Jr Johanson J.B., 1983. Method of measuring invertase activity in soils. Plant and Soil 74: 301-311.

  • Gianfreda L., Rao M.A., Piotrowska A., Palumbo G., Colombo, C., 2005. Soil enzyme activities as affected by anthropogenic alterations: intensive agricultural practices and organic pollution. Science of the Total Environment 341: 265-279.

  • IUSS Working Group WRB, 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome.

  • Ivask M., Kuu A., Meriste M., Truu J., Truu M., Vaater V., 2008. Invertebrate communities (Annelida and epigeic fauna): in three types of Estonian cultivated soils. European Journal of Soil Biology 44, 5: 532-540.

  • Jänsch S., Römbke J., Didden W., 2005. The use of enchytraeids in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 62: 266-277.

  • Karaca A., Cetin S.C., Turgay O.C., Kizilkaya R., 2011. Soil enzymes as indication of soil quality. [In:] Soil Enzymology. (Shukla G., Varma A., Eds.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg: 119-148.

  • Kasprzak K., 1986. Skąposzczety wodne i glebowe II, Rodzina: Wazonkowce (Enchytraeidae). PAN, Warszawa (in Polish).

  • Klute A., Dirksen C., 1986. Water retention. Laboratory methods. [In:] Methods of soil analysis, Part 1: Physical and mineralogical methods. (Klute A., Ed.) Agronomy Monograph. 9, J. American Society of Agronome, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

  • Kucharski J., 1997. Relacje miêdzy aktywnooecią enzymów a żyznooecią gleby (Relationships between enzymatic activity and soil fertility). [In:] Drobnoustroje w oerodowisku. Wystêpowanie, aktywnooeæ i znaczenie (Barabasz W., Ed.). Akademia Rolnicza, Kraków: 327-347 (in Polish).

  • Lagerlof J., Andren O., Paustian K., 1989. Dynamics and contribution to carbon flows of enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta) under four cropping systems. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 183-199.

  • Parmelee R.W., Beare M.H., Cheng W., Hendrix P.F., Rider S.J., Crossley Jr D.A., Coleman D.C., 1990. Earthworms and enchytraeids in conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems: abiocide approach to assess their role in organic matter breakdown. Biology and Fertility of Soils 10: 1-10.

  • Pączka G., Mazur-Pączka A., Kostecka J., 2015. Soil fauna research in Poland: earthworms (Lumbricidae). Soil Science Annual 66(2): 47-51.

  • Polskie Towarzystwo Gleboznawcze, 2009. Particle size distribution and textural classes of soils and mineral materials - classification of Polish Society of Soil Science 2008. Roczniki Gleboznawcze - Soil Science Annual 60(2): 5-16 (in Polish with English abstract).

  • PN-R-04032, Polish Soil Sampling Standard. Soil and mineral soil materials. Sampling and determination of particle size distribution. Warszawa, Poland, 12 pp. (in Polish).

  • Römbke J., Jänsch S., Höfer H., Horak F., Roß-Nickoll M., Russell D., Toschki A., 2013. State of knowledge of enchytraeid communities in German soils as a basis for biological soil quality assessment. Soil Organims 85, 2: 123-146.

  • Russel S., 2005. Znaczenie badañ enzymów w oerodowisku glebowym. Acta Agrophysica 3: 5-9 (in Polish).

  • Schlaghamerský J., Šídová A., Piñl V., 2007. From mowing to grazing: Does the change in grassland management affect soil annelid assemblages? European Journal of Soil Biology 43: 72-78.

  • Severon T., Joschko M., Barkusky D., Graefe U., 2012. The impact of conventional and reduced tillage on the Enchytraeidae population in sandy soil and their correlation with plant residue and earthworms, Landbauforschung, Agriculture and Forestry Research 357: 45-52.

  • Tabatabai M.A, Bremner J.M., 1972. Assay of urease activity in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 4: 479-429.

  • Taylor J.P., Wilson B., Mills M.S., Burns R.G., 2002. Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 34(3): 387-401.

  • Topoliantz S., Ponge F., Viaux Ph., 2000. Earthworm and enchytraeid activity under different arable farming systems, as exemplified by biogenic structures. Plant Soil 225: 39-51.

  • Wallenius K., Rita H., Mikkonen A., Lappi K., Lindström K., Hartikainen H., Raateland A., Niemi R.M., 2011. Effects of land use on the level, variation and spatial structure of soil enzyme activities and bacterial communities. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 43(7): 1464-1473.

  • Włodarczyk T., 2000. Some of aspects of dehydrogenase activity in soils. International Agrophysics 14(3): 341-354.


Journal + Issues