An attempt of integrating the systematic of urban soils into the new Russian soil classification system

Tatiana Prokof'eva 1 , Maria Gerasimova 1 , 2 , Irina Lebedeva 2  and Irina Martynenko 1
  • 1 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1-12, 119991, Moscow
  • 2 Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Pyzhevskiy per., 7, 117049, Moscow


An attempt to incorporate the popular systematic of urban soils proposed by Marina Stroganova with colleagues into the new Russian soil classification system is presented. It was facilitated by the coincidence of approaches in both systems: priority of diagnostic horizons and their combinations as criteria to identify soil types being the main units in all Russian classifications. The central image of urban soils . urbanozem . in Stroganova.s system found its due place in the order of stratozems (urbostratozem type) owing to its diagnostic horizon . urbic, which combines artificial and natural properties, and to its simultaneous formation with the parent material.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Achkasov A.I., Basharkevich I.L., Varava K.V., Samayev S.B., 2006. Snow cover pollution by icing-reducing reagents (in Russian). Prospect. & control geol. environ. 9.10: 132.137.

  • Aparin B.F., Sukhacheva E.YU., 2012. Principles of urban soils classification (with the example of S. Petersburg). (in Russian) [In:] Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference .Geochemistry of Landscapes and Geography of Soils., dedicated to the 100th birthday of M.A. Glazovskaya. Moscow Lomonosov Univ., Moscow (Kasimov N.S. Editor): 43.45.

  • Burghardt W., 2000. The German double track concept of classifying soils by their substrate and their anthropo-natural genesis: the adaptation to urban areas. [In:] Proceedings of First International Conference SUITMA. Germany, Essen, 1: (Burghardt W. and Dornauf Ch. Editors): 217.222.

  • Craul P.J., 1992. Urban soils in landscape design. John Wiley& Sons: 396 pp.

  • Gerasimova M.I., Stroganova M.N., Mozharova N.V., Prokof¢eva T.V., 2003. Anthropogenic Soils: Genesis, Geography, and Remediation: Textbook (in Russian). Oekumena, Smolensk: 267 pp.

  • IUSS Working Group WRB., 2006. World Reference Base for Soil Resources, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports, 103. FAO, Rome.

  • Kasimov N.S., 1995. Methodology and methods of landscapegeochemical analysis of cities. [In:] Ecogeochemistry of urban landscapes. Moscow Univ. Publ., Moscow: 6.39.

  • Kavtaradze D.N., Fridman V.S., Simkin D.N., 2000. Creation of sustainable ecological frame in megapolis as a strategical objective in urban environment quality management. (in Russian) [In:] Proceedings of the International Conference .Ecopolis .. Moscow: (Kavtaradze D.N. Editor): 129.131.

  • Klausnitzer B., 1987. Ecology of City Fauna (in German). VEB Gustav Fisher Verlag Jena, Leipzig: 191 pp.

  • Komisja V Genezy, Klasyfikacji i Kartografii Gleb PTG., 2011: Systematyka Gleb Polski, wyd. 5, Rocz. Glebozn. 62(3): 1.193.

  • Lehmann A., Stahr K., 2007. Nature and Significance of Anthropogenic Urban Soils. Soils & Sediments 7 (4): 247.260.

  • Matinian N.N., Bakhmatova K.A., 2012. Soils of Saint-Petersburg. (in Russian) [In:] Proceedings of the All-Russian Congress of Soil Scientists. Book 3. Petrozavodsk: (Shoba S. et al. Editors) 80.81.

  • Privalenko V.V., Bezuglova O.S., 2003. Ecological Problems of Anthropogenic Landscapes in the Rostov Region (in Russian) (Ecology of Rostov-on-Don). SKNTS VSH, Rostov-on Don: 283 pp.

  • Prokof¢eva T.V., Martynenko I.A., Ivannikov F.A., 2011. Classification of Moscow Soils and Parent Materials and Its Possible Inclusion in the Classification System of Russian Soils. Eurasion Soil Sci. 44(5): 561.571.

  • Prokof¢eva T.V., Varava O.A., Sedov S.N., Kuznetsova A.M., 2010. Morphological Diagnostics of Pedogenesis on the Anthropogenically Transformed Floodplains in Moscow. Eurasion Soil Sci. 43(4): 368.379.

  • Rahleeva A.A., Prokof¢eva T.V., Poputnikov V.O., 2007. Soils transformation peculiarities and mesofauna communities transformation in urban environment. [In:] Pr., Abstr. of The 4th International Conference SUITMA, China, Nanjing: (Zhang G. Editor): 158.159.

  • Shishov L.L., Tonkonogov V.D., Lebedeva I.I., Gerasimova M.I., 2004. Classification and Diagnostics of Soils of Russia (in Russian). English version: Russian Soil Classification System. 2001. Oekumena, Smolensk: (Dobrovolski G. Editor): 220 pp.

  • Sobocka J., 2001. New Trends in Anthropogenic Soil Groups Formation. [In:] Soil Anthropization. VI. Summaries of Oral and Poster Presentations, International Workshop. Bratislava: 42.

  • Stroganova M.N., Miagkova A.D., Prokof¢eva T.V. Skvortsova I.N., 1998. Soils of Moscow and Urban Environment. PAIMS. Moscow: 178 pp.

  • Stroganova M.N, Prokof¢eva T.V., 2000. Urban soils ¾ concept, definitions, classification. [In:] Proceedings of First International Conference SUITMA. Germany, Essen, 1: (Burghardt W. and Dornauf Ch. Editors): 235.239.

  • Stroganova M.N., Gerasimova M.I., Prokof.eva T.V., 2005. Approaches to Grouping Technogenic Soils. Eurasion Soil Sci. 38(1): 66.71.

  • Sukopp H., Trepl L., 2000. Urban Ecology as Biological Science and as a Field of Political and Management Activities (in German) [In:] Proceedings of the International Conference .Ecopolis.. Moscow: (Kavtaradze D.N. Editor): 108.110.

  • Tonkonogov V.D., Lebedeva I.I., 1999. A System for Categorizing Technogenic Surface Formations. [In:] Proceedings of Classification, Correlation and Management of Anthropogenic Soils, Nevada and California (Kimble J.M. et al. Editors). USDA-NRCS, Lincoln, NE: 186.192.


Journal + Issues