Riding the storm out: select demographics of a breeding population of Cooper’s hawks (Accipiter cooperii) following a severe spring snowstorm

Robert N. Rosenfield 1
  • 1 Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin at Stevens Point, 54481, Stevens Point

Abstract

The demographic responses to severe weather by top-level predators, including birds of prey, are underreported and/or unknown. Severe storms are predicted by climate change models to increase globally and in frequency into the 22nd century. In April 2018, a population of breeding Cooper’s hawks (Accipiter cooperii) in central Wisconsin, USA, experienced three days of heavy snowfall in the most severe storm, in pre-incubation-stage, for 39 years (1980–2018). Here I report select demographic outcomes of this nesting population following this intense weather. The median hatching date of 10 June in 2018 was the sixth latest such metric in those 39 years (and the latest in 22 years since 1996) for this population, which has advanced its breeding schedule about 1.3 days/decade due to climate change or warming. Survival of a total of 16 color-marked breeding adults, 15 males and 1 female, observed pre-storm in the nesting areas, was 100% up through the late nestling stage in the same nesting areas where these birds were initially detected in 2018. Average clutch size (4.4 eggs/nest) and average brood size (4.0 young/nest) were similar to the overall average annual metrics of these demographics for this population in the earlier 38 study years. Nest success, whereby 95% of 21 nests with eggs produced advanced-aged young, was higher in 2018 than the overall average of 77% nest success rate during the earlier years. The later timing of hatching in 2018, likely due to the severe spring snowstorm, appeared to have no deleterious effects either on survival of the breeding adults or on the reproductive output of this healthy study population. Tree-canopy prey may have served as important alternative food for this typically ground-foraging raptor in 2018.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anctil A, Franke A & Bêty J 2014: Heavy rainfall increases nestling mortality of an arctic top predator: experimental evidence and long-term trend in peregrine falcons. Oecologia 174: 1033–1043. DOI: 10.1007/S00442-013-2800-y.

  • Bradley NL, Leopold AC, Ross J & Huffaker W 1999. Phenological changes reflect climate change in Wisconsin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 96: 9701–9704.

  • Dawson WR 1997: Pine siskin (Spinus pinus), 1–24. In: Poole A & Gill F (eds), The birds of North America. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and The American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington DC.

  • Dickey MH, Gauthier G & Cadieux MC 2008: Climatic effects on the breeding phenology and reproductive success of an arctic-nesting goose species. Global Change Biology 14: 1973–1985. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01622.x.

  • Franke A, Galipeau & Nikolaiczuk L 2013: Brood reduction by infanticide in peregrine falcons. Arctic 66: 226–229.

  • Gaston AJ, Gilechrist HG & Mallory ML 2005: Variation in ice conditions has strong effects on the breeding of marine birds at Prince Leopold Island, Nunavut. Ecography 28: 331–344. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04179.x.

  • Hunter CM, Caswell H, Runge MC, Regehr EV, Amstrup SC & Stirling I 2010: Climate change threatens polar bear populations: a stochastic demographic analysis. Ecology 91: 2883–2897. DOI: 10.1890/09-1641.1.

  • Krüger O 2004: The importance of competition, food, habitat, weather and phenotype for the reproduction of buzzard Buteo buteo. Bird Study 51: 125–132.

  • Lõhmus A 2003: Are certain habitats better every year? A review and a case study on birds of prey. Ecography 26: 545–552. DOI. 10.1034/j.1600-0587.1999.03575.x.

  • McClure CJW, Westrip JRS, Johnson JA, Schulwitz SE, Virani MZ, Davies R, Symes A, Wheatley H, Thorstrom R, Amar A, Buij R, Jones VR, Williams NP, Buechley ER & Butchart SHM 2018: State of the world’s raptors: distributions, threats, and conservation recommendations. Biological Conservation 227: 390–402. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.08.012.

  • Millsap BA, Breen TF & Phillips LM 2013: Ecology of the Cooper’s hawk in north Florida. North American Fauna 78: 1–58. DOI: 10.3996/nafa.78.0001.

  • Møller AP, Fielder W & Berthold P 2010. Effects of climate change on birds. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • National Climatic Data Center. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/dataaccesstools.html#climate.

  • Newton I, McGrady MJ & Oli MK 2016: A review of survival estimates for raptors and owls. Ibis 158: 227–248. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12355.

  • Rodriguez CR & Bustamante J 2003: The effect of weather on lesser kestrel breeding success: can climate change explain historical population declines? Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 793–810. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00757.x.

  • Rosenfield RN 2018: The Cooper’s hawk: breeding ecology and natural history of a winged huntsman. Hancock House Publishers, Blaine, USA.

  • Rosenfield RN & Bielefeldt J 1999: Mass, reproductive biology, and nonrandom pairing in Cooper’s hawks. Auk 116: 830–835.

  • Rosenfield RN, Grier JW & Fyfe RW 2007: Reducing management and research disturbance, 351–364. In: Bird DM & Bildstein KL (eds), Raptor research and management techniques. Hancock House Publishers, Blaine, USA.

  • Rosenfield RN, Bielefeldt J, Affeldt JL, & Beckmann DJ 1995: Nesting density, nest area reoccupancy, and monitoring implications for Cooper’s hawks in Wisconsin. Journal of Raptor Research 29: 1–4.

  • Rosenfield RN, Bielefeldt J, Sonsthagen SA & Booms TL 2000. Comparable reproductive success at conifer plantation and non-plantation nest sites for Cooper’s hawks in Wisconsin. Wilson Bulletin 112: 417–421.

  • Rosenfield RN, Bielefeldt J, Rosenfield LJ, Booms TL & Bozek MA 2009: Survival rates and lifetime reproduction of breeding male Cooper’s hawks in Wisconsin, 1980–2005. Wilson Journal of Ornitholo gy 121: 610–617.

  • Rosenfield RN, Hardin MG, Bielefeldt J & Keyel ER 2016: Are life history events of a northern breeding population of Cooper’s hawks influenced by changing climate? Ecology and Evolution 7: 399–408. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2619.

  • Serbin SP & Kucharik CJ 2009: Spatiotemporal mapping of temperature and precipitation for the development of a multi-decadal climatic dataset for Wisconsin. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 48: 742–757. DOI: 10.1175/2008 JAMC1986.1.

  • Stirling I & Derocher AE 2012: Effects of climate warming on polar bears: a review of the evidence. Global Change Biology 18: 2694–2706. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02753.x.

  • US Census Bureau 2000. US Census 2000: US Dept of Commerce, Washington DC. Retrieved December 30, 2018, from http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html.

  • USGCRP 2017: Climate Science Special Report 2017: 4th National climate Assessment, Volume 1. Wuebbles DJ, Fahey DW, Hibbard KA, Dokken DJ, Stewart BC & Maycock TK (eds), US Global Change Research Program, Washington DC. DOI: 10.7930/J0J964J6.

  • Wellicome TI, Fisher RJ, Poulin RG, Todd LD, Bayne EM, Tyler Flockhart DT, Schmutz JK, De Smet K & James PC 2014: Apparent survival of adult burrowing owls that breed in Canada is influenced by weather during migration and on their wintering grounds. Condor 116: 446–458. DOI: 10.1650/condor-13-161.1

  • Whelan S, Strickland D, Morand-Ferron J & Norris DR 2017: Reduced reproductive performance associated with warmer ambient temperatures during incubation in a winter-breeding, food-storing passerine. Ecology and Evolution 7: 3029–3036. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2864.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search