This paper aims to demonstrate that using a plurilingual and ecological approach to English language teaching can achieve better results in primary school independently of the mother tongue of the student. This article is based on the initial results of our international research carried out in three very different countries (Norway, China and Spain). While the author´s research project involves 328 participants, we will present the results of the first phase of the experiment, including 133 students. In this paper, we propose a plurilingual communicative approach to English teaching as a foreign language, making a distinction between languages for communication and languages for identification. This research examines the current teaching policies in the participating countries, and analyses cross-cultural and cross-linguistic perspectives in English language teaching while promoting the positive use of the mother tongue as a connecting tool in the students’ communication system. The subjects of this study were divided in control and experimental groups, in which they received traditional and plurilingual approach respectively. After the classes they completed a test and were then supplied with a Likert scale questionnaire focused on understanding their attitude and motivation towards mother tongue and English language learning. Based on observation and results obtained, we can conclude that a plurilingual approach that uses L1 as a tool in English teaching improves English learning, as well as develops an ecological understanding of languages.
Beacco, J. C., Byram, M., Cavalli, M., Coste, D., Cuenat, M. E., Goullier, F., & Panthier, J. (2016). Guide for the Development and Implementation of Curricula for Plurilingual and Intercultural Education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Bech, K., & Embley Emonds, J. (2016). English is (still) a West Germanic language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 39(1), 65–100. doi:10.1017/S0332586515000219.
Cenoz, J. (2013). The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. Language Teaching, 46(1), 71–86. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000218.
Cook, V. J. (2001). Using the First Language in the Classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402–423. doi:10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402.
Cornillie, B., Lambert, J., & Swiggers, P. (2009). Linguistic identities, language shift and language policy in Europe. Leuven: Peeters.
De Bot, K. (2019). Defining and Assessing Multilingualism. In J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism (p. 880). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Dobson, A., Pérez Murillo, M. D., & Johnstone, R. (2010). Programa de educación bilingüe en España. Informe de evaluación. Madrid: Ministerio de educación y British Council.
Ferre-Pavia, C., Zabaleta, I., Gutierrez, A., Fernandez-Astobiza, I., & Xamardo, N. (2018). Internet and Social Media in European Minority Languages: Analysis of the Digitalization Process. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1065–1086. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7464.
Friedrich, P., & Matsuda, A. (2010). When Five Words Are Not Enough: A Conceptual and Terminological Discussion of English as a Lingua Franca. International Multilingual Research Journal, 4(1), 20–30. doi:10.1080/19313150903500978.
Haugen, E. (1972). The ecology of language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
House, J. (2003). English as a lingua franca: A threat to multilingualism? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 556–578. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00242.x.
Jenkins, J., Cogo, A., & Dewey, M. (2011). Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching, 44(3), 281–315. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000115.
Jenkins, J., Modiano, M., & Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Euro-English. English Today 68, 17(4), 13–19. doi:10.1017/S0266078401004023.
Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic Awareness in Multilinguals: English as a Third Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Mühlhäusler, P. (2003). Language endangerment and language revival. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(2), 232–245. doi:10.1111/1467-9481.00221.
North, B., & Piccardo, E. (2016). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment Developing Illustrative Descriptors of Aspects of Mediation for the CEFR. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Phillipson, R. (2003). English-Only Europe? London: Routledge.
Phillipson, R., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1997). Linguistic human rights and English in Europe. World Englishes, 16(1), 27–43. doi:10.1111/1467-971X.00044.
Rindal, U., & Piercy, C. (2013). Being “neutral”? English pronunciation among norwegian learners. World Englishes, 32(2), 211–229. doi:10.1111/weng.12020.
Schmitz, J. R. (2014). Looking under Kachru’s (1982, 1985) three circles model of World Englishes: the hidden reality and current challenges. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 14(2), 373–411. doi:10.1590/S1984-63982014005000010.
Seidlhofer, B. (2009). Common ground and different realities: world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. World Englishes 28(2), 236–245. doi:10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01592.x.
Seidlhofer, B., Breiteneder, A., & Pitzl, M.-L. (2006). English as a lingua franca in Europe Challenges for Applied Linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26. doi:10.1017/S026719050600002X.
Sifakis, N. C., Lopriore, L., Dewey, M., Bayyurt, Y., Vettorel, P., Cavalheiro, L., Kordia, S. (2018). ELF-awareness in ELT: Bringing together theory and practice. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 7(1), 155–209. doi:10.1515/jelf-2018-0008.