Ludwig Lachmann and the Austrians

Open access


Ludwig Lachmann looked to the Austrian School of economics as an intellectual space of refuge from the sterile formalism that constituted the academic work of the mainstream economics establishment. From an early interest in capital-theory, he moved to broader epistemological, methodological, and institutional concerns – specifically, from the subjectivism of values to the subjectivism of expectations and the implications thereof for human action. Human action in disequilibrium was his central focus. This paper examines the relationship of Lachmann’s views to the Austrians, those who preceded him, those of his time, and those who have come after him. During his lifetime his views sometimes provoked controversy. I examine this from the perspective of 2017 and the concerns of the modern Austrian intellectual community and find that Lachmann’s views are surprisingly much more complementary to those of his contemporary Austrians than has perhaps hitherto been realized.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Boettke P. J. Coyne C. J. & Newman P. (2016). ‘The History of a Tradition: Austrian Economics from 1871 to 2016 Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 23 199–243.

  • Braun E. Lewin P. and Cachanosky N. (2016). “Ludwig Von Mises’s Approach to Capital as a Bridge between Austrian and Institutional Economics.” Journal of Institutional Economics doi: 10.1017/S1744137416000102.

  • Cachanosky N. (2014). Expectation in Austrian business cycle theory: Market Share Matters. The Review of Austrian Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11138–014–0267–7

  • Böhm-Bawerk Eugen von (1959) Capital and Interest (3 vols in 1) South Holland: Libertarian Press.

  • Grinder W. E. (1977a) Capital Expectations and the Market Process Essays on the Theory of the Market Economy Kansas City: Sheed Adrews and McMeel.

  • Grinder W. E. (1977b) ‘In Pursuit of the Subjective Paradigm’ in Walter E. Grinder (ed.) (1977a) 3–24.

  • Hayek F.A. (1933) Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle London: Jonathan Cape.

  • Hayek F.A. (1933b) ‘Price Expectations Monetary Disturbances and Malinvestment’ lecture delivered in Copenhagen Dec. 1933; reprinted in F. A. Hayek (1939a) 135–156.

  • Hayek F.A. (1935) Prices and Production London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Hayek F.A.(1939) Profits Interest and Investment London: Routledge.

  • Hayek F.A. (1941) The Pure Theory of Capital Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Keynes John Maynard (1930) A Treatise on Money 2 vols London: Macmillan.

  • Keynes John Maynard (1936) The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money London: Macmillan.

  • Kirzner I. M. (1966). An Essay on Capital August M. Kelly New York.

  • Lachmann Ludwig M. (1943) ‘The role of expectations in economics as a social science’ Economica 10 (37) 12–23; reprinted in Walter E. Grinder (ed.) (1977a) pp. 65–80.

  • Lachmann L.M. (1977) ‘Austrian Economics in the Present Crisis of Economic Thought’ in Grinder 1977a 44.

  • Lachmann L. M. (1978). Carl Menger and the Incomplete Revolution of Subjectivism. Atlantic Economic Journal 6(3) 57–59.

  • Lachmann L M. (1979) ‘The Flow of Legislation and the Permanence of the Legal Order’ ORDO 30 1 69–70.

  • Lewin P. (1997) ‘Hayekian Equilibrium and Change’ Journal of Economic Methodology 4 (2) 245–266.

  • Lewin P. (2011) [1999] Capital in Disequilibrium Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

  • Lewin P. (2013) ‘Hayek and Lachmann and the Complexity of Capital’ in R. Garrison (ed.) The Elgar Companion to Hayek Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Lewin P. and Baetjer H. (2011) “The Capital Based View of the Firm.” Review of Austrian Economics 24 (4): 335–354.

  • Lewin P. and Cachanosky N. (2017) ‘Value and Capital: Austrian Capital Theory Retrospect and Prospect Review of Austrian Economics (forthcoming).

  • Lewin P. and Cachanosky N. (2018) ‘The Average Period of Production: The History of an Idea’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought (forthcoming).

  • Menger C. (1871) Principles of Economics. Translated by James Dingwall and Bert F. Hoselitz. New York: New York University Press (1976).

  • Menger Carl. 1883 (translated from German 1963). Investigations into the Method of The Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. New York University Press 1985 2nd. Urbana: University of Illionois Press.

  • Mises L. von. (1943) ‘”Elastic Expectations” and the Austrian Theory of The Trade Cycle’ Economica 10 251–252.

  • Mittermaier K. H. M. (1992) ‘Ludwig Lachmann (1906–1990) A biographical sketch’ South African Journal of Economics 60 (1) 7–25.

  • Schumpeter J.A. (1947) Capitalism Socialism and Democracy New York: Harper.

  • Zanotti G. J. & Cachanosky N. (2013) ‘The Epistemological Implications of Machlup’s Interpretation of Mises’s Epistemology.’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 37 (1) 111–138.

Journal information
Impact Factor

Cite Score 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.138
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.358

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 40 40 14
PDF Downloads 29 29 5