The Role of Rhetoric in Economics and Economy*

Open access

Abstract

In this paper we attempt to show that rhetoric plays an important role in economics as a science and in economy as a social system. Our task is rather demonstrative, but it aims at stripping away the illusion that economics has acquired a status equal to the natural sciences, in which there is no place for subjectivism and ambiguity. Economics belongs, after all, to the realm of the social sciences and as such it is subject to the limitations of human cognition and understanding. We show that economics as a science is not free from employing sophisticated methods of persuasion and rhetoric. Next, we also try to demonstrate that rhetoric can be a useful tool in creating economic reality. It does not have influence on economic processes per se, but it is helpful in constructing an institutional architecture of the economy by influencing public opinion and decision makers.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Becker G.S. Becker G.N. (1997) The Economics of Life. McGraw-Hill.

  • Birks S. (2012a) Rethinking Economics: Theory as Rhetoric Bristol Business School Economic Papers http://www2.uwe.ac.uk/faculties/BBS/BUS/Research/economics2012/1213.pdf (accessed 17.08.2018).

  • Birks S. (2012b) Rethinking Economics: Economics as a Toolkit Bristol Business School Economic Papers http://www2.uwe.ac.uk/faculties/BBS/BUS/Research/economics2012/1215.pdf (accessed 17.08.2018).

  • Blaug M. (1992) The Methodology of Economics. Or How Economists Explain. Cambridge University Press.

  • Blyth M. (2001) The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas Distributional Conflict and Institutional Change World Politics vol. 54/1 p. 1–26.

  • Boréus K. (1997) The Shift to the Right: Neo-Liberalism in Argumentation and Language in the Swedish Public Debate since 1969 European Journal of Political Research vol. 31/3 p. 257–286.

  • Friedman M. (1953) The Methodology of Positive Economics in: M. Friedman Essays in Positive Economics University of Chicago Press.

  • Klamer A. (2007) Speaking of Economics. How to Get in the Conversation. Rout-ledge.

  • Klamer A. Leonard T.C. (1994) So What’s an Economic Metaphor? In: P. Mirowski (ed.) Natural Images in Economic Thought Cambridge University Press.

  • Kochanowicz J. (2014) Private Suffering Public Benefit. Market Rhetoric in Poland 1989–1993. East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures vol. 28/1 p. 103–118.

  • Kowalik T. (2012) From Solidarity to Sellout. The Restoration of Capitalism in Poland. Monthly Review Press.

  • Lakoff G. Johnson M. (2003) Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

  • McCloskey D. (1983) The Rhetoric of Economics Journal of Economic Literature vol. 21/2 p. 481–517.

  • McCloskey D. (1985) The Rhetoric of Economics University of Wisconsin Press.

  • McCloskey D. (1994) Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics Cambridge University Press.

  • Montanye J.A. (2005) Rhetoric and Economic Policy The Independent Review vol. 9/3 p. 325–338.

  • North D. (2005) Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton University Press.

  • Pethö E. (2005) Introduction to Rhetorical Economics European Integration Studies vol. 4/1 p. 109–114.

  • Rodrik D. (2015) Economic Rules. Oxford University Press.

  • Schmidt V. (2008) Bringing Ideas and Discourse Back into the Explanation of Change in Varieties of Capitalism and Welfare States. The Centre for Global Political Economy University of Sussex Working Paper No. 2.

  • Schmidt V. (2010) Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’ European Political Science Review vol. 2/1 p. 1–25.

  • Sloane T.O. (2017) Rhetoric. Encyclopaedia Britannica http://britannica.com/topic/rhetoric (accessed 28.08.2018).

  • Weaver D.H. (2007) Thoughts on Agenda Setting Framing and Priming Journal of Communication vol. 57/1 p. 142–147.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


Cite Score 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.138
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.358

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 43 43 7
PDF Downloads 34 34 3