Something, nothing and Leibniz’s question. negation in logic and metaphysics

Open access


This paper discusses the concept of nothing (nothingness) from the point of logic and ontology (metaphysics). It is argued that the category of nothing as a denial of being is subjected to various interpretations. In particular, this thesis concerns the concept of negation as used in metaphysics. Since the Leibniz question ‘Why is there something rather than nothing?’ and the principle of sufficient reason is frequently connected with the status of nothing, their analysis is important for the problem in question. Appendix contains a short critical analysis of Heidegger’s famous statement Das Nichts nichtet.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Barrow J. The Book of Nothing. Random House New York 2000.

  • [2] Białas A. Fizyka wkracza w metafizykę (Physics Enters Metaphysics]. PAUza Akademicka 78 (2010) p. 1.

  • [3] Carnap R. ¨Uberwindung der Metaphysik durch die Logische Analyse der Sprache. Erkenntnis 2 (1932) pp. 219-241; Eng. tr. The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language [in:] Logical Posivivism edited by A. J. Ayer Glencoe Ill. The Free Press.

  • [4] Casati R. A. Varzi. Holes and Other Superficialities. The MIT Press Cambridge Mass. 1994.

  • [5] Close F. Nothing: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press Oxford 2009.

  • [6] Engfer H.-J. Principium rationis sufficientis. [In:] Histoprisches W¨orterbuch der Philosophie herausgegeben von J. Ritter und K. Gr¨under Band 7: P-Q pp. 1326-1336.

  • [7] Genz H. Nothingness. The Science of Empty Space. Perseus Book Cambridge Mass. 1984.

  • [8] Pruss A. S. The Principle of Sufficient Reason. A Reassessment Cambridge Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2006.

  • [9] Rundle B. Why there is Something rather than Nothing Oxford Oxford University Press 2004.

  • [10] Weatherall J. O. Void. The Strange Physics of Nothing. Yale University Press New Haven.

  • [11] Wojtysiak J. O zasadzie racji dostatecznej (On the Principle of Sufficient Reason). Roczniki Filozoficzne LIV(1) 2006 pp. 179-216.

  • [12] Wojtysiak J. Dlaczego istnieje raczej coś niż nic? Analiza problemu w kontekście dyskusji we wspołczesnej filozofii analitycznej (Why is there Something rather than Nothing? An Analysis of the Problem in the Context of the Discussion Conducted in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy). Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II Lublin 2006.

  • [13] Woleński J. Metalogic and Ontology. [In:] The Courage of Doing Philosophy. Essays Presented to Leszek Nowak edited by J. Brzeziński A. Klawiter T. Kuipers K. Łastowski K. Paprzyckia and P. Przybysz Rodopi Amsterdam 2007 pp. 337-351.

  • [14] Woleński J. Applications of Squares of Oppositions and Their Generalizations in Philosophical Analysis Logica Universalis 2(1)(2008) pp. 13-29; reprinted [in:] J. Woleński Essays on Logic and Its Applications in Philosophy Peter Lang Frankfurt am Main 2011 pp. 255-269.

  • [15] Woleński J. Nothingness Philosophy and Keret’s House [In:] Przestrzenie pustki / Void Spaces Fundacja Polskiej Sztuki Nowoczesnej / Foundation of Polish Modern Art. Warszawa 2013 pp. 23-39.

  • [16] Woleński J. Status zasady racji dostatecznej (The Status of the Principle of Sufficient Reason) Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria (25(4)(100) (2016) pp. 439-450.

Journal information
Impact Factor

Cite Score 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.138
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.358

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 174 174 20
PDF Downloads 105 105 6