The logical challenge of negative theology

Open access


In this paper I present four interpretations of so-called negative theology and provide a number of attempts to model this theory within a formal system. Unfortunately, all of them fail in some manner. Most of them are simply inconsistent, some contradict the usual religious praxis and discourse, and some do not correspond to the key theses of negative theology. I believe that this paper shows how challenging this theory is from a logical perspective.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • E. Benor “Meaning and Reference in Maimonides’ Negative Theology” The Harvard Theological Review vol. 88 (1995) pp. 339-360.

  • J. M. Bocheński The Logic of Region New York University Press New Yourk 1965.

  • J. Bowker The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions Oxford University Press Oxford 1997.

  • B. Brogaard J. Salerno “Fitch’s Paradox of Knowability” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition) Edward N. Zalta (ed.) URL =

  • A. Colacito et. al. “Subminimal negation” Soft Computing vol. 21 (2016) pp. 165-174.

  • T. Coquand “Type Theory” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition) Edward N. Zalta (ed.) URL =

  • J. M. Dunn Generalized Ortho Negation (in:) Negation: A Notion in Focus H. Wansing (ed.) Walter de Gruyter Berlin - New York 1996 pp. 3-26.

  • M. Durrant “The Meaning of ‘God’ (I)” (in:) Religion and Philosophy M. Warner (ed.) Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1992 pp. 71-84.

  • G. Englebretsen “The Logic of Negative Theology” New Scholasticism vol. 47 (1973) pp. 228-232.

  • F. B. Fitch “A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts” The Journal of Symbolic Logic vol. 28 (1963) pp. 135-142.

  • I. Franck “Maimonides and Aquinas on Man’s Knowledge of God: A Twentieth Century Perspective” The Review of Metaphysics vol. 38 (1985) pp. 591-615.

  • J. I. Gellman “The meta-philosophy of religious language” Nous vol. 11 (1971) pp. 151-161.

  • G. W. F. Hegel W. Wallace J. N. Findlay Hegel’s Logic. Being Part One of The Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830) Clarendon Press Oxford 1975.

  • J. D. Jacobs “The Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God. Fundamentality and Apophatic Theology” (in:) Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion VI R. Audi et. al (eds.) Oxford University Press New York 2015 pp. 158-175.

  • J. N. Jones “Sculpting God: The Logic of Dionysian Negative Theology” Harvard Theological Review vol. 89 (1996) pp. 355-371.

  • P. Kügler “The meaning of mystical darkness” Religious Studies vol. 41 (2005) pp. 95-105.

  • M. Maimonides The Guide of the Perplexed vol. I Shlomo Pines (trans.) University of Chicago Press Chicago - London 1963.

  • U. Meixner “Negative Theology Coincidentia Oppositorum and Boolean Algebra” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy vol. 1 (1998) pp. 75-89.

  • S. P. Odintsov “On the structure of paraconsistent extensions of Johansson’s logic” Journal of Applied Logic vol. 3 (2005) pp. 43-65.

  • S. P. Odintsov Constructive Negations and Paraconsistency Trends in Logic vol. 26 Springer-Verlag New York 2008.

  • R. Otto The Idea of the Holly. An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational transl. John W. Harvey Oxford University Press London 1923.

  • Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite “Mystical Theology” (in:) Ibidem Collected works C. Luibheid P. Rorem (transl.) Paulist Press New York 1987 pp. 133-142.

  • H. Putnam “On negative theology” Faith and Philosophy vol. 14 (1997) pp. 407-422.

  • P. Rojek “Towards Logic of Negative Theology” (in:) Logic in Religious Discourse A. Schumann (ed.) Ontos Verlag Frankfurt 2010 pp. 192-215.

  • P. Rorem Pseudo-Dionysius. A Commentary on the Texts and an Introduction to Their Influence Oxford University Press New York - Oxford 1993.

  • S. Ruczaj “Analogia i apofatyczny pazur” Pressje vol. 30/31 (2012) pp. 280-282.

  • P. Sikora Logos niepojęty Universitas Krakow 2010.

  • Y. Shramko “Dual Intuitionistic Logic and a Variety of Negations: The Logic of Scientific Research” Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic Vol. 80 (2005) pp. 347-367.

  • R. Sorensen “Epistemic Paradoxes”The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition) Edward N. Zalta (ed.) URL =

  • C. M. Stang “Negative Theology from Gregory of Nyssa to Dionysius the Areopagite” (in:) The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Christian Mysticism J. A. Lamm (ed.) Wiley-Blackwell Oxford 2012 pp. 161-176.

  • H. Wansing “Diamonds Are a Philosopher’s Best Friends: The Knowability Paradox and Modal Epistemic Relevance Logic” Journal of Philosophical Logic vol. 31 (2002) pp. 591-612.

  • J. Woleński “Theology and Logic” (in:) Logic in Theology B. Brożek A. Olszewski M. Hohol (eds.) Copernicus Center Press Krakow 2013 pp. 11-38.

  • J. Woleński “Polish Attempts to Modernize Thomism by Logic (Bocheński and Salamucha)” Studies in East European Thought vol. 55 (2003) pp. 299-313.

  • A. A. Zinov’ev Foundations of the Logical Theory of Scientific Knowledge (Complex Logic) T. J. Blakeley (transl.) D. Reidel Publishing Company Dordrecht 1973.

Journal information
Impact Factor

Cite Score 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.138
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.358

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 298 190 25
PDF Downloads 253 180 22