Thought Suppression Research Methods: Paradigms, Theories, Methodological Concerns

Open access


It is hard to provide an unequivocal answer to the question of whether or not thought suppression is effective. Two thought suppression paradigms - the “white bear” paradigm and the think/no-think paradigm - give mixed results. Generally, “white bear” experiments indicate that thought suppression is counterproductive, while experiments in the think/no-think paradigm suggest that it is possible to effectively suppress a thought. There are also alternative methods used to study thought suppression, for instance the directed forgetting paradigm or the Stroop task. In the article, I describe the research methods used to explore thought suppression efficacy. I focus on the “white bear” and the think/no-think paradigms and discuss theories proposed to explain the results obtained. I also consider the internal and external validity of the methods used.

Abramowitz, J. S., Tolin, D. F., & Street, G. P. (2001). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(5), 683-703.

Anderson, M. C. (2005). The role of inhibitory control in forgetting unwanted memories: A consideration of three methods. In N. Ohta, C.M. MacLeod, B. Uttl (Eds.), Dynamic cognitive processes (pp. 159-190). Tokyo: Springere- Verlag.

Anderson,M. C. (2006). Repression: A cognitive neuroscience approach. InM.Mancia (Ed.), Neuroscience and psychoanalysis (pp. 327-349). Milan: Springer.

Anderson,M. C., & Green, C. (2001). Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control. Nature, 410(6826), 366-369.

Anderson, M. C., Ochsner, K. N., Kuhl, B., Cooper, J., Robertson, E., Gabrieli, S. W., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2004). Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science, 303(5655), 232-235.

Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Fishman, D. J., Mrazek, M. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Unnoticed intrusions: Dissociations of meta-consciousness in thought suppression. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(3), 1003-1012.

Depue, B. E., Curran, T., & Banich, M. T. (2007). Prefrontal regions orchestrate suppression of emotional memories via a two-phase process. Science, 317(5835), 215-219.

Giuliano, R. J., & Wicha, N. Y. (2010). Why the white bear is still there: Electrophysiological evidence for ironic semantic activation during thought suppression. Brain Research, 1316, 62-74.

Johnston, L., Bulik, C.M., & Anstiss, V. (1999). Suppressing thoughts about chocolate. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 26(1), 21-27.

Koster, E. H., Rassin, E., Crombez, G., & Näring, G. W. (2003). The paradoxical effects of suppressing anxious thoughts during imminent threat. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(9), 1113-1120.

Levy, B. J., & Anderson, M. C. (2008). Individual differences in the suppression of unwanted memories: the executive deficit hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 127(3), 623-635.

Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 808-817.

Murray, B. D., Muscatell, K. A., & Kensinger, E. A. (2011). Effects of emotion and age on performance during a think/no-think memory task. Psychology and Aging, 26(4), 940-955.

Najmi, S., & Wegner, D. M. (2008). Mental control: Thought suppression and psychopathology. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 447-459). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Purdon, C. (1999). Thought suppression and psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(11), 1029-1054.

Rachman, S., & de Silva, P. (1978). Abnormal and normal obsessions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 16(4), 233-248.

Racsḿany, M., & Conway, M. A. (2006). Episodic inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(1), 44-57.

Rassin, E. (2005). Thought suppression. Elsevier.

Roemer, L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1994). Effects of suppressing thoughts about emotional material. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(3), 467-474.

Sheard, E. D., & MacLeod, C. M. (2005). List method directed forgetting: Return of the selective rehearsal account. In N. Ohta, C. M. MacLeod, & B. Uttl (Eds.), Dynamic cognitive processes (pp. 219-248). Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.

Wegner, D. M. (1992). You can’t always think what you want: Problems in the suppression of unwanted thoughts. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 193-225.

Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101(1), 34-52.

Wegner, D. M. (2009). How to think, say, or do precisely the worst thing for any occasion. Science, 325(5936), 48-50.

Wegner, D. M., Broome, A., & Blumberg, S. J. (1997). Ironic effects of trying to relax under stress. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(1), 11-21.

Wegner, D. M., & Erber, R. (1992). The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 903-912.

Wegner, D. M., & Gold, D. B. (1995). Fanning old flames: emotional and cognitive effects of suppressing thoughts of a past relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 782-792.

Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Zanakos, S. (1993). Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1093-1104.

Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 5-13.

Wenzlaff, R. M., & Bates, D. E. (1998). Unmasking a cognitive vulnerability to depression: how lapses in mental control reveal depressive thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1559-1571.

Wenzlaff, R. M., & Wegner, D. M. (2000). Thought suppression. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 59-91.

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

The Journal of University of Bialystok

Journal Information

Cite Score 2017: 0.28

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.136
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.293


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 267 225 18
PDF Downloads 132 127 21