”Whatever Does Not Kill Me Makes Me Stronger”: A Sociological Analysis of Uses of the Concept of Resilience. The Case of Boris Cyrulnik’s Self-Help Books Readers

Open access


This article offers a social science analysis of the resilience concept’s success and common sense uses. Based on a sample of letters from the readers of the French author Boris Cyrulnik’s self-help best-sellers, the article first depicts the characteristics of the attitude of the letters’ authors towards Cyrulnik and what they expect from him. Second, it proposes to understand resilience as a language game used to communicate about suffering and then analyses why certain readers feel resilient while others don’t. It concludes that this way of reacting to adversity (i. e., tapping one’s inner resources, never giving up) is particularly desirable in a context where autonomy has become more prestigious.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Adger Neil. 2000. Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related? Progress in Human Geography 24(3): 347–364.

  • Alexander Jeffrey. 2004. Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy. Sociological Theory 22: 527–573.

  • Bonanno Georges A. 2004. Loss Trauma and Human Resilience: Have We Underestimated the Human Capacity to Thrive After Extremely Aversive Events? American Psychologist 59(1): 20–28.

  • Bowlby John. 1958. The Nature of the Child’s Tie to His Mother. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 39: 350–371.

  • Brand Fridolin S. and Kurt Jax. 2007. Focusing the Meaning(s) of Resilience: Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object. Ecology and Society 12(1): 23.

  • Carel Havi. 2008. Illness. Durham: Acumen.

  • Castel Pierre-Henri. 2012. La fin des coupables. Paris: Ithaque.

  • Cavell Stanley. 1979. The Claim of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cyrulnik Boris. 2006. De chair et d’âme. Paris: Odile Jacob.

  • Cyrulnik Boris. 2004. Parler d’amour au bord du gouffre. Paris: Odile Jacob.

  • Cyrulnik Boris. 2001. Les vilains petits canards. Paris: Odile Jacob.

  • Cyrulnik Boris. 1999. Un merveilleux malheur. Paris: Odile Jacob.

  • Das Veena. 2013. Institutions psychiatriques et vies singulières. La maladie mentale en contexte de pauvreté urbaine. Pp 135–160 in Face aux désastres. Une conversation à quatre voix sur la folie le care et les grandes détresses collectives edited by Anne M. Lovell Stefania Pandolfo Veena Das and Sandra Laugier. Paris: Ithaque.

  • Das Veena. 1998. Wittgenstein and Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 27: 171–195.

  • Davidson Debra J. 2010. The Applicability of the Concept of Resilience to Social Systems: Some Sources of Optimism and Nagging Doubts. Society and Natural Resources 23(12): 1135–1149.

  • Dumont Louis. 1985. Essais sur l’individualisme. Paris: Le Seuil.

  • Ehrenberg Alain. 2010. La société du malaise. Paris: Odile Jacob.

  • Fairclough Norman. 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge.

  • Fassin Didier and Richard Rechtman. 2007. L’empire du traumatisme. Enquête sur la condition de victime. Paris: Flammarion.

  • Fletcher David and Mustafa Sarkar. 2013. Psychological Resilience: A Review and Critique of Definitions Concepts and Theory. European Psychologist 18(1): 12–23.

  • Folke Alan. 2006. Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social-ecological Systems Analyses. Global Environmental Change 16: 253–267.

  • Frank Arthur. 1995. The Wounded Storyteller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Glaser Barney G. and Anselm A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Holling Stanley C. 1973. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.

  • Ionescu Serban and Colette Jourdan-Ionescu. 2010. Entre enthousiasme et rejet: l’ambivalence suscitée par le concept de résilience. Bulletin de psychologie 510: 401–403.

  • Kaplan Herbert. 2006. Towards an Understanding of Resilience. A Critical Review of Definitions and Models. Pp. 17–83 in Resilience and Development: Positive Life Adaptations edited by Michael Glantz and Johnson J. New York: Plenum.

  • Laugier Sandra. 2013. Veena Das Wittgenstein and Stanley Cavell. Le care l’ordinaire et la folie. Pp 161–185 in Face aux désastres. Une conversation à quatre voix sur la folie le care et les grandes détresses collectives edited by Anne M. Lovell Stefania Pandolfo Veena Das and Sandra Laugier. Paris: Ithaque.

  • Lichterman Paul. 1992. Self-Help Reading as a Thin Culture. Media Culture & Society 14: 421–447.

  • Luthar Suniya S. Dante Cicchetti and Bronwyn Becker. 2000. The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work Child Development 71(3): 543–562.

  • Macé Marielle. 2011. Façons de lire manières d’être. Paris: Gallimard.

  • Marquis Nicolas. 2015. Allowing for Social Desirability in Reception Studies. The Case of Self-Help Book Readers. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology 127(1): 58–71.

  • Marquis Nicolas. 2014. Du bien-être au marché du malaise. La société du développement personnel. Paris: PUF.

  • Masten Anne S. and Dante Cicchetti. 2012. Risk and Resilience in Development and Psychopathology: The Legacy of Norman Garmezy. Development and Psychopathology 24: 333–334.

  • Masten Anne. S. Karen Best and Norman Garmezy. 1990. Resilience and Development: Contributions From the Study of Children Who Overcome Adversity. Development and Psychopathology 2: 425–444.

  • Norris Fran. H. Susan P. Stevens Betty Pfefferbaum Karen F. Wyche and Rose L. Pfefferbaum. 2008. Community Resilience as a Metaphor Theory Set of Capacities and Strategy for Disaster Readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology 41(1–2): 127–150.

  • Olsson Lennart Anne Jerneck Henrik Thoren Johannes Persson and David O’Byrne. 2015. Why Resilience Is Unappealing to Social Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations of the Scientific Use of Resilience. ScienceAdvances 1(4) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640643 (15.09.2016).

  • Orgad Shani. 2009 The Survivor in Contemporary Culture and Public Discourse: A Genealogy. Communication Review 12(2): 132–161.

  • Richardson Glenn E. 2002. The Metatheory of Resilience and Resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology 58(3): 307–321.

  • Rutter Michael. 1999. Resilience as the Millenium Rorschach: Response to Smith and Gorrell Barnes. Journal of Family Therapy 21(2) : 159–160.

  • Rutter Michael 1985. Resilience in the Face of Adversity – Protective Factors and Resistance to Psychiatric Disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry 147: 598–611.

  • Simonds Wendy. 1992. Women and Self-Help Culture: Reading Between the Lines. New Brunswick N. J.: Rutgers University Press.

  • Sontag Susan. 1990. Illness as Metaphor. New York: Penguin Books.

  • Southwick Steven M. George A. Bonanno Ann S. Masten Catherine Panter-Brick and Rachel Yehuda. 2014. Resilience Definitions Theory and Challenges: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 5 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4185134/ (15.09.2016).

  • Tisseron Serge. 2005. La résilience. Paris: PUF.

  • Tugade Michele M. Barbara L. Fredrickson and Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2004. Psychological Resilience and Positive Emotional Granularity: Examining the Benefits of Positive Emotions on Coping and Health. Journal of Personality 72: 1161–1190.

  • Ungar Michael. 2008. Resilience Across Cultures. British Journal of Social Work 38(2): 218–235.

  • Werner Emily E. and Smith R. S. 1982. Vulnerable But Invicible: A Longitudinal Study of Resilient Children and Youth. New York: McGrawHill.

  • Winch Peter. 2009 [1958]. L’idée d’une science sociale et sa relation à la philosophie. Paris: Gallimard.

  • Winch Peter. 1964. Understanding a Primitive Society. American Philosophical Quarterly 1: 307–324.

  • Wittgenstein Ludwig. 2010 [1953]. Recherches philosophiques. Paris: Gallimard.

  • Woods Angela. 2013. Rethinking “Patient Testimony.” Journal of Literature and Science 6: 38–54.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.141
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.087

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 292 292 39
PDF Downloads 208 208 18