(In)efficiency of EU Common Foreign and Security Policy: Ukraine, Brexit, Trump and beyond

Open access

Abstract

The main aim of this article is to explore and analyze key determinants of EU Common Foreign and Security Policy efficiency. For this purpose a 3C analytical approach is used, exploring EU foreign and security policy consistency, capacities and the dimension of cooperation. Article analyzes both horizontal and vertical, consistency of EU Foreign and Security policy especially with connection to Ukraine crises and diverging interests of EU member states. EU capacities are explored with main focus on military spending and challenges related to limited spending. EU military decline is put in contrast with new emerging regional powers. In the area of cooperation article is dedicated mainly to ineffective partnership with Turkey, cold attitude of Trump administration towards Europe and the implications of Brexit for EU foreign and security policy.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • BICKERTON C.J. 2011. European Union Foreign Policy. From Effectiveness to Functionality New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • CICEO G. 2012. The Common Foreign and Security Policy and the Inexhaustible Question for its Institutional Consistency Studia UBB. Europaea LVII (1): 37-54.

  • COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2016/982 of 17 June 2016 amending Decision 2014/386/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol.

  • COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 2009. EU Military Rapid Response Concept. Retrieved from April 3 2017.

  • DER SPIEGEL. 2016. Signal des Niedergangs. Der Spiegel Nr. 46. Retrieved from April 3 2017. https://magazin.spiegel.de/SP/2016/46/147863976/index.html?utm_source=spon&utm_campaign=centerpage.

  • EILSTRUP-SANGIOVANNI M. 2017. What Future for Europe’s Security and Defense Policy? E-International Relations 3. 1. 2017. Retrieved from April 4 2017. http://www.e-ir.info/2017/01/03/what-future-for-europes-security-and-defense-policy/.

  • EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. 2015. Russia is no longer a strategic partner of the EU Say MEPs. 11. 6. 2015. Retrieved from April 4 2017. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20150604IPR62878/russia-is-no-longer-a-strategic-partner-of-the-eu-say-meps.

  • GALLINA N. 2015. European countries exporting arms to Russia and to Ukraine Euromaidan Press 8. 3. 2015 Retrieved from April 2 2017.http://euromaidanpress.com/2015/03/08/european-countries-exporting-arms-to-russia-and-to-ukraine/.

  • GINSBERG R. H. and PENKSA S. E. 2012. The European Union in Global Security: The Politics of Impact New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • HARRISON A. 2016. Brexit and Anglo-Australian Defence Policy: Back to the future? Indo-Pacific Strategic Papers September 2016.

  • HUFFINGTON POST. 2014. Britain Sells £84m Of Arms To Russia And Still Has 271 Export Licenses Despite Crimea Crisis Huffington Post 5. 3. 2014 Retrieved from April 2 2017. http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/03/05/russia-arms-trade_n_4901787.html.

  • JOKELA J. 2011. Europeanisation and Foreign Policy: State Identity in Finland and Britain New York: Routledge.

  • JUNCKER J. C. 2016. State of the Union Address 2016: Towards a better Europe – a Europe that protects empowers and defends. Strasbourg 14 September 2016.

  • KEUKELEIRE S. and DELREAUS T. 2008. The Foreign Policy of the European Union New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • KISSINGER H. A. 1994. Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.

  • KUNZ J.L. 1953. Treaty Establishing the European Defense Community The American Journal of International Law 47 (2): 275-281.

  • MARCH L. 2011. Radical Left Parties in Contemporary Europe Abingdon: Routledge.

  • MCNAMARA K. R. 2017. Trump Takes Aim at the European Union. Foreign Affairs 24. 1. 2017.

  • LARSEN H. 2014. The EU as a Normative Power and Research on External Perceptions: The Missing Link. Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (4): 896-910.

  • MIHÁLIK J. and JANKOLA M. 2016. European Migration Crisis: Positions polarization and conflict management of Slovak Political Parties Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 9 (1): 1-25.

  • MIX D. E. 2011. The European Union: Foreign and Security Policy Current Politics and Economics of Europe 22 (3): 373-408.

  • MUDDE C. 2014. The far right and the European elections Current History 113 (761): 98–103.

  • MUELLER P. 2013. Europe’s Foreign Policy and the Middle East Peace Process: The Construction of EU Actorness in Conflict Resolution Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14 (1): 20-35.

  • NATO (2016) Communiqué de presse PR/CP(2016)116. Retrieved from April 4 2017. http://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2016_07/20160704_160704-pr2016-116.pdf (3. 4. 2017).

  • NIELSEN K.L. 2013. EU Soft Power and the Capability-Expectations Gap Journal of Contemporary European Research 9 (5): 723-739.

  • NOMIKOS J. 2005. The European Union’s Proposed Intelligence Service. World Security Network 17. 6. 2005. Retrieved from April 2 2017. http://www.worldsecuritynetwork.com/Europe/john-nomikos-1/The-European-Unions-Proposed-Intelligence-Service.

  • NUTTAL S. 2005. Coherence and Constituency. In: HILL Ch. and SMITH M. (eds.). International Relations and the European Union New York: Oxford University Press.

  • NYE J. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

  • OLSEN G. R. 2008. Coherence Consistency and Political Will in Foreign Policy: The European Union’s Policy towards Africa Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9 (2): 157-171.

  • ORENSTEIN M. A. and KELEMEN D. R. 2017. Trojan Horses in EU Foreign Policy Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (1): 87-102.

  • POLITICO. 2017. All of Trump’s Russia Ties in 7 Charts. Michael Cowley March and April 2017. Retrieved from April 3 2017. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/connections-trump-putin-russia-ties-chart-flynn-page-manafort-sessions-214868.

  • RAĂIU A. and VASILEAN B. 2009. NATO and EU Military Capabilities Complementary from the perspective of participation in multinational operations Revista Academiei Fertelor Tereste 14 (4): 32-38.

  • REUTERS. 2014. Baltic states to back further Russia sanctions if Ukraine crisis does not ease. Reuters UK 21. 6. 2014. Retrieved from April 2 2017. http://uk.reuters.com/article/ukraine-crisis-sanctions-baltics-idUKL6N0P20CM20140621.

  • RIDDERVOLD M. 2016. (Not) in the Hands of the Member States: How the European Commission Influences EU Security and Defence Policies Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (2): 353-369.

  • ROSÉN G. 2015. EU Confidential: The European Parliament’s Involvement in EU Security and Defence Policy Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (2): 383-398.

  • SAVORSKAYA E. 2015. The Concept of the European Union’s Normative Power Baltijskij Region 4 (26): 66-76.

  • SCHAKE K. 2016. Post-Brexit Defense Policy Foreign Policy 25. 6. 2016. Retrieved from April 4 2017. http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/06/25/brexit-defense-eu/.

  • SMITH M. 2013. Foreign policy and development in the post-Lisbon European Union Cambridge Review of International Affairs 26 (3): 519-535.

  • SPEECH BY PRESIDENT JEAN-CLAUDE JUNCKER AT THE 20TH SAINT PETERSBURG INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC FORUM 2016. Saint Petersburg 16 June 2016. Retrieved from April 4 2017. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-16-2234_en.htm.

  • STANLEY-LOCKMAN Z. and WOLF K. 2016. European defence spending 2015: The force awakens. European Union Institute for Security Studies Brief 10 (March 2016).

  • TAVARES R. 2010. Regional Security: The Capacity of International Organizations New York: Routledge.

  • THE GUARDIAN. 2011. Libya no-fly zone plan rejected by EU leaders. The Guardian 11. 3. 2011. Retrieved from April 2 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/mar/11/libya-no-fly-zone-plan-rejected.

  • THE NEW YORK TIMES. 1991. WAR IN THE FULF: EUROPE; Gulf Fighting Shatters European’s Fragile Unity. The New York Times. 25. 1. 1991. Retrieved from April 5 2017. http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/25/world/war-in-the-gulf-europe-gulf-fighting-shatters-europeans-fragile-unity.html?pagewanted=1.

  • THE TELEGRAPH. 2011. Libya: Can Britain and France really run this conflict? The Telegraph 22. 3. 2011. Retrieved from April 2 2017. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/concoughlin/8399184/Libya-Can-Britain-and-France-really-run-this-conflict.html.

  • THOMAS D. C. 2012. Still Punching below Its Weight? Coherence and Effectiveness in European Union Foreign Policy Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (3): 457-474.

  • TOMESCU G.-V. 2015. EU in Crisis: Current Challenges in the Area of SFSP. A Legal Perspective CKS Proceedings 5: 868-872.

  • TREATY ON THE EUROPEAN UNION. OJ C 202 (2016). Retrieved from April 1 2017. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2016:202:TOC.

  • TREATY ON THE FUNCIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. OJ C 202 (2016). Retrieved from April 1 2017. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2016:202:TOC.

  • VILSON M. 2015. The Foreign Policy of the Baltic States and the Ukrainian Crisis: A Case of Europeanization? New Perspectives 23 (2): 49-76.

  • WALTER Aaron T. 2015. Foreign Policy: Public Opinion and Political Legacy Slovak Journal of Political Sciences 15 (3): 202-220.

  • WHITE HOUSE. 2017. The Inaugural Address. January 20 2017. Retrieved from April 3 2017. https://www.whitehouse.gov/inaugural-address.

  • WHITMAN R. G. 2016. The UK and EU Foreign Security and Defence Policy after Brexit: Integrated Associated or Detached? National Institute Economic Review 238.

  • WORLD BANK. 2016. Military expenditure (% of GDP). Retrieved from April 3 2017. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 681 357 19
PDF Downloads 474 308 8