Background: This paper discusses gender differences in working conditions and related psychological and healthrisks in Slovenia.
Methods: The analysis is based on the 5th European Working Conditions Survey and data from a special Moduleon working conditions and psychological and health risks in the working environment in Slovenia obtained in 2010.
Results: Gender differences exist in the reported work conditions and work satisfaction of the employed population,and the reported physical and mental health problems in Slovenia. Analysis of the correlation between health-relatedproblems under different work conditions also show gender differences.
Conclusion: Women are more overburdened with paid and unpaid work, they report less autonomy at the workplace,are less satisfied with working conditions and they report more physical and mental problems that are associatedwith work.
1. Svetlik I. Introduction: cracks in the success story. In: Svetlik I, Ilič B, editors. HRM’s contribution to hard work. Bern: Peter Lang, 2006: 9 - 24.
2. Kanjuo Mrčela A, Ignjatović M. Unfriendly flexibilisation of work and employment - the need for flexicurity. In: Svetlik I, Ilič B, editors. HRM’s contribution to hard work. Bern: Peter Lang, 2006: 215 - 350.
3. Jogan M. Redomestication of women and democratization in postsocialist Slovenia. In: Łobodzinska B, editor. Family, women, and employment in Central-Eastern Europe. Westport, London: Greenwood, 1995: 229 - 236.
4. Jogan M. The stubbornness of sexism in the second part of the twentieth century in Slovenia. In: Toš N, Muller KH, editors. Political faces of Slovenia: political orientations and values at the end of the century - outlines based on Slovenian public opinion surveys. Wien: Edition Echoraum. 2005: 297 - 313.
5. Kanjuo Mrčela A, Černigoj Sadar N. Social policies related to parenthood and capabilities of Slovenian parents. Social Politics 2011; 18; 2: 199 - 232.
6. Ule M, Kuhar M. Mladi, družina, starševstvo. Ljubljana: FDV, 2003.
7. Rener T. Politična ekonomija družinskega dela in novo očetovstvo. Teorija in praksa 2007; 1-2: 127 - 141.
8. Fifth European working conditions survey - 2010. European Foundation 2011. Available September 1, 2012 from: http://www. eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/ewcs/2010/index.htm.
9. Meleis AI. Women‘s work, health and quality of Life. Binghamton: Haworth Medical Press Inc, 2001.
10. Hilfinger Messias DK, Aroha Page EI, Regev H, Spiers J, Yoder L, Meleis AI. Defining and redefining work: implications for women‘s health. Gender Society 1997; 11: 296 - 323.
11. Kostiainen E, Martelin T, Kestila L, Martikainen P, Koskinen S.
12. Employee, partner, and mother: woman‘s three roles and their implications for health. J Family Iss 2009; 8: 1122 - 1150.
13. Payne J, Payne G, Bond M. Health. In: Payne G, editor. Social divisions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006: 325 - 344.
14. 5th European working conditions survey, 2010, Slovenia; Technical Report. Gallup Europe, 2010.
15. Bullers S. Women’s roles and health: the mediating effect of perceived control. Women Health 1994; 22: 11 - 30.
16. Fagan C, Burchell, B. Gender, jobs and working conditions in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EC, 2002.
17. Kalleberg AL. Non-standard employment relations: part-time, temporary and contract work, Ann Rev Soc 2000; 26: 341 - 365.
18. Whittock MC, Edwards S, McLaren O. The tender trap: gender, part-time nursing and the effects of “family friendly” policies on career advancement. Sociol Health Illn 2000; 24: 305 -326.
19. Walters V. The Social context of women‘s health. BMC Women Health 2004; 4 (Suppl 1): S2.
20. Ule M. Družbeni vidiki zdravja in medicine. Soc Delo 2012; 1/3: 5-14.
21. Ule M. Spregledana razmerja: o družbenih vidikih sodobne medicine. Maribor: Aristej, 2003.
22. Kamin T, Berzelak N, Ule M. The infuence of education on difference in depressive symptoms between men and women in Slovenia. Zdrav Var 2011; 51: 33-42.
23. Artazcoz L, Cortès I, Borrell C. Work and family: “double workload” overburdens women’s health: special report, spring summer. Barcelona: Public health agency, Biomedical, epidemiology and public health research consortium, 2011.
24. Dennerstein L. Mental health, work, and gender. Int J Health Serv 1995; 25: 503-509.
25. Chandola T, Martikainen P, Bartley M, Lahelma E, Marmot M, Michikazu S, Nasermoaddeli A, Kagamimori S. Does conflict between home and work explain the effect of multiple roles on mental health?: a comparative study of Finland, Japan, and the UK. Int J Epidemiol 2004; 33: 884 - 893.
26. Staland Nyman C, Alexanderson K, Hensing G. Associations between strain in domestic work and self-rated health: a study of employed women in Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2008; 36: 21.
27. Ballantyne P J. The social determinants of health: a contribution to the analysis of gender differences in health and illness. Scand J Pub Health 1999; 27: 290-295.
28. 4th European working conditions survey. Dublin: European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions, 2007.
29. Weiler A. Gender issues in health and safety at work. Available September 1, 2012 from: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ ewco/2004/04/EU0404NU04.htm.
30. Charles N. Gender in modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
31. Lynne F. Speaking allowed: the political voice of public health. Zdrav Var 2011; 51: 5-7.
32. Kanjuo Mrčela A, Ignjatović M. Report on psychosocial risks at workplace in Slovenia. Ljubljana: Faculty for social sciences, 2012.
33. Doyal L. What makes women sick: gender and the political economy of health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Uni Press, 1995.