Violence Risk Assessment Practices in Denmark: A Multidisciplinary National Survey

Open access

Abstract

With a quadrupling of forensic psychiatric patients in Denmark over the past 20 years, focus on violence risk assessment practices across the country has increased. However, information is lacking regarding Danish risk assessment practice across professional disciplines and clinical settings; little is known about how violence risk assessments are conducted, which instruments are used for what purposes, and how mental health professionals rate their utility and costs. As part of a global survey exploring the application of violence risk assessment across 44 countries, the current study investigated Danish practice across several professional disciplines and settings in which forensic and high-risk mental health patients are assessed and treated. In total, 125 mental health professionals across the country completed the survey. The five instruments that respondents reported most commonly using for risk assessment, risk management planning and risk monitoring were Broset, HCR-20, the START, the PCL-R, and the PCL:SV. Whereas the HCR-20 was rated highest in usefulness for risk assessment, the START was rated most useful for risk management and risk monitoring. No significant differences in utility were observed across professional groups. Unstructured clinical judgments were reported to be faster but more expensive to conduct than using a risk assessment instrument. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.

[1] Retspsykiatri. Kvalitet og Sikkerhed (2011). Danske Regioner, Website: Regioner.dk: http://www.regioner.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2011/marts/~/media/8A7912C499DA4E1A8E58A9766A363942.ashx

[2] Bonta, J. Offender risk assessment: Guidelines for selection and use, Crim Justice Behav, 2002, 29, 355-379.

[3] Conroy, MA, & Murrie, DC, Forensic Evaluation of Violence Risk: A Guide to Risk Assessment and Risk Management, Oxford University Press, New York, 2007.

[4] Grove, WM, & Meehl, PE, Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy, Psychol Public Pol L, 1996, 2, 293-323.

[5] Bloom, H, & Webster, CD, Essential Writings in Violence Risk Assessment and Management, Centre for Addictions and Mental Health, Toronto, 2007.

[6] Webster, CD, Haque, Q, & Hucker, S. SPJ Guides, In: Webster, CD, Haque, Q, & Hucker, S, Violence Risk - Assessment and Management. Advances Through Structured Professional Judgment and Sequential Redirections, Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, 2014.

[7] Douglas, KS, Cox, DN, & Webster, CD, Violence risk assessment: Science and practice. Legal Criminol Psych, 1999, 4, 149-184.

[8] Best Practice in Managing Risk, London: Department of Health, National Risk Management Programme, UK, 2007.

[9] Bloom H, Webster C, Hucker S, De Freitas K. The Canadian contribution to violence risk assessment: History and implications for current psychiatric practice, Can J Psychiat, 2005, 50, 3-11.

[10] Agisdottir S, White MJ, Spengler PM, Maugherman AS, Anderson LA, Cook RS, et al. The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction, Couns Psychol, 2006, 34, 341-382.

[11] Singh JP & Fazel S. Forensic risk assessment: A metareview. Crim Justice Behav, 2010, 37, 965−988.

[12] Yang M, Wong SCP, & Coid J. The efficacy of violence predicition: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools, Psychol Bull, 2010, 136, 740-767.

[13] Singh JP, Grann M, & Fazel S. A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25.980 participants, Clin Psychol Rev, 2011, 31, 499-513.

[14] Dolan M & Doyle M. Violence risk prediction. Clinical and actuarial measures and the role of the Psychopathy Checklist, Brit J Psychiat, 2000, 177, 303-311

[15] Webster C.D., Martin M.L., Brink J., Nicholls T.L., & Desmarais L., Manual for the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START). Version 1.1, ON: Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission, Hamilton, 2009

[16] Webster C.D., Douglas KS, Eaves D, and Hart, SD, HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence. Version 2, BC: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Burnaby, 1997.

[17] Bengtson S & Pedersen L. Implementation of evidence-based practices in forensic psychiatric clinical practice in Denmark: Are we there? Scan J Forensic Science, 2008, 2, 37-72.

[18] Pedersen L, Rasmussen K, & Elsass, P. Risk Assessment: The value of structured professional judgments, Int J Forensic Ment Health, 2010, 9, 74-81.

[19] Pedersen L, Kunz, C, Rasmussen K, & Elsass, P. Psychopathy as a risk factor for violent recidivism: Investigating the Psychopathy Checklist Screening Version (PCL:SV) and the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) in a forensic psychiatric setting, Int J Forensic Ment Health, 2010, 9, 308-315.

[20] Pedersen L, Rasmussen K, & Elsass P. HCR-20 violence risk assessments as a guide for treating and managing violence risk in a forensic psychiatric setting. Psychol Crime Law, 2012, 18, 733-743.

[21] Pedersen L & Rasmussen K. Reliability of the Danish version of the HCR-20 Risk assessment scheme, Scan J Forensic Science, 2006, 2 45-96.

[22] Retspsykiatrisk Rapport (2009). Psykiatri og Social. Region Midtjylland. Website: Region Midt: http://www.regionmidtjylland.dk/politik/regionsr%C3%A5dets+m%C3%B8der/visdagsorden?file=19-08-2009/Aaben_dagsorden/Bilag/Punkt_11_Bilag_1___-____._.pdf.

[23] Hurducas CC, Singh JP, De Ruiter C, & Petrila J. Violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review of surveys, Int J Forensic Ment Health, 2014, 13, 182-192

[24] Sing, JP, Desmarais SL, Hurducas C, Arbach-Lucioni K, Condemarin C, Dean K et al. International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: A global survey of 44 countries, Int J Forensic Ment Health, 2014, 13, 193-206.

[25] Dillman, D, Smyth, J & Christian, L. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys. The Tailored Design Method (3rd Ed.), NJ: Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 2009.

[26] Almvik, R, Woods, P, & Rasmussen, K. The Broset Violence Checklist. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Interrater Reliability, J Interpers Violence December 2000, 15, 1284-1296.

[27] Hart SD, Cox D, & Hare RD. Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version, ON: Multi- Health Systems, Toronto, 1995.

[28] Hare, RD. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, ON: Multi-Health Systems, Toronto, 2003.

[29] Desmarais SL, Nicholls TL, Read JD, & Brink J. Confidence and accuracy in assessments of short-term-risks presented by forensic psychiatric patients, J Foren Psychi Psych, 2010, 21, 1-22.

[30] Douglas KS & Reeves KA. Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) Violence Risk Assessment Scheme, In: Otto RK & Douglas KS (Eds.), Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment, Routledge, NY, 2010.

[31] Andrews, DA, & Bonta J. LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised, ON: Multihealth Systems, Toronto, 1995.

[32] O’Rourke M, Hammond S, & Davies E. Risk assessment and risk management: The way forward, Psychiatr Care, 1997, 4, 104-106

[33] Thornton, D. Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment, Sex Abuse-J Res Tr, 2002, 14, 139-153.

[34] de Vogel, V, de Ruiter, C, Bouman, Y, & de Vries Robbe, M. Guide to the SAPROF. Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk. Version 1, Utrecht: Forum Educatief, 2007.

[35] Hartvig, P, Ostberg, B, Alfarnes, S, Moger, TA, Skjonberg, M, & Bjorkly, S. Violence Risk Screening-10 (V-RISK-10), Oslo: Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, 2007.

[36] Quinsey, VL, Harris, GT, Rice, ME, & Cormier, CA. Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk. US: American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 2006.

[37] Wong, S, & Gordon, A. Manual for the Violence Risk Scale, Saskatoon, SK: University of Saskatchewan, 2009.

Scandinavian Journal of Forensic Science

The Journal of Danish Society of Forensic Medicine

Journal Information

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 143 143 10
PDF Downloads 66 66 14